Fwd: Bug#1054361: ITP: jruby-jzlib

Hello, I've prepared the jruby-jzlib package, but I'm uncertain about the relationship it should have with jzlib. Since the module itself is still using the same "com.jcraft" namespace, I'm thinking of using a Conflicts: and Provides: on libjzlib-java. You can check out the package here: h

[aure...@debian.org: Re: Fwd: (buildd chroot bug) Re: Bug#1040167: openjdk-8-jre-headless: version 8u382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 which is not in Debian]

/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 23:02:38 +0200 Subject: Re: Fwd: (buildd chroot bug) Re: Bug#1040167: openjdk-8-jre-headless: version 8u382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 which is not in Debian Message-ID: [ tl;dr for buildd-maintainers: nothing to do. ] Hi, On 2023-07-02 21:44, Thorsten

Fwd: [oracle/graal] [RFE] Support building Graal VM with native-image with OpenJDK 11 (#2196)

This shouldn’t be a problem for us, I assume src:openjdk-11 will be updated. -- Forwarded message -- From: Severin Gehwolf Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:21:17 -0700 Subject: Re: [oracle/graal] [RFE] Support building Graal VM with native-image with OpenJDK 11 (#2196) R

Fwd: [Help] gradle-plugin-protobuf

Oops, meant to send to list... -- Forwarded message - From: Olek Wojnar Date: Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:20 PM Subject: Re: [Help] gradle-plugin-protobuf To: Samyak Jain Hi Samyak, On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 8:12 AM Samyak Jain wrote: > While parsing through dependencies for bundl

Fwd: [GSoC 2020] Improving Clojure Packaging for GSoC 2020?

Dear all, Maybe someone from the Java Team might be interested in mentoring this? In case the scope might be a problem (see below), it's just a matter of further discussing the idea. Of course, a prerequisite for this would be getting a potential mentor :-) Best, Leandro -- Forwarded me

Fwd: Looking for help in contributing to java packages

-- Forwarded message - From: Manas Kashyap Date: Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:00 PM Subject: Looking for help in contributing to java packages To: Hola , I am Manas Kashyap , currently an undergrad from India , i am looking for packages in which i can contribute to under java team . I

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hi Robert, Some comments with my Maven package maintainer hat. Le 12/02/2019 à 20:09, Robert Scholte a écrit : > I'm also wondering how you build Maven, since Maven is > being built with Maven. That should be a challenge to also rebuild all > plugins, etc. The maven package is rebuilt with the

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Jar manifest files carry data like "built-by" and implementation information: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/deployment/jar/packageman.html Why not reuse "Implementation-Vendor" or invent a new entry and put "Debian" in there. Maven can display this additional information on "mvn -versio

AW: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

@lists.debian.org; Matthias Klose Betreff: Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk Am 2019-02-12 um 20:09 schrieb Robert Scholte: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:56 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Dalibor Topic (Oracle) and Robert Scholte (Apache Maven) contacted m

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Am 2019-02-12 um 20:09 schrieb Robert Scholte: On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:56 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: Hello, Dalibor Topic (Oracle) and Robert Scholte (Apache Maven) contacted me and were so kind to agree to make this discussion public, so that others can chime in too. I would like to use

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hi Markus, On 12.02.2019 12:34, Markus Koschany wrote: Regarding javadoc generation we would like to see an option that basically reverts to pre OpenJDK8 and simply is less strict than the current implementation. Unfortunately, we don't plan to go back to the pre-Java 8 Javadoc implementatio

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hi Robert, Am 12.02.19 um 20:09 schrieb Robert Scholte: [...] > Hi Markus, > > first of all thanks for the insights, it is important for us to know how > Maven is used and in which way we can improve that way-of-work. Hervé is > already working hard on the reproducible builds specs with your team

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:34:56 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: Hello, Dalibor Topic (Oracle) and Robert Scholte (Apache Maven) contacted me and were so kind to agree to make this discussion public, so that others can chime in too. I would like to use the opportunity to answer the initial question

Fwd: FOSDEM 19 Debian Java talk

Hello, Dalibor Topic (Oracle) and Robert Scholte (Apache Maven) contacted me and were so kind to agree to make this discussion public, so that others can chime in too. I would like to use the opportunity to answer the initial question "what we are interested in seeing better supported from build t

Fwd: #897945 still present/breaks with Java 8

Sorry, was sent to the wrong address. Forwarded Message Subject: #897945 still present/breaks with Java 8 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:40:42 +0200 From: Per Lundberg To: 897...@bugs.debian.org CC: pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, Markus Koschany FWIW, version 1.4.2-

Re: Fwd: Bug#910327: RFS: javapoet/1.11.1-1 [ITP]

Hello Tony, can you please take a look at it again? It can be downloaded from mentors, using same command (URL): dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/javapoet/javapoet_1.11.1-1.dsc I have explicitly listed files copyrighted by Google in debian/copyright. And, I have left Sq

Re: Fwd: Bug#910327: RFS: javapoet/1.11.1-1 [ITP]

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 5:43 AM tony mancill wrote: > > Hello Miroslav, > > Thank you for packaging javapoet. I was looking at doing this as a > dependency for some of the OpenHFT libraries. > > One minor change I think we need to make to debian/copyright is to > explicitly list the files that hav

Re: Fwd: Bug#910327: RFS: javapoet/1.11.1-1 [ITP]

Hello Miroslav, Thank you for packaging javapoet. I was looking at doing this as a dependency for some of the OpenHFT libraries. One minor change I think we need to make to debian/copyright is to explicitly list the files that have Google and not Square as the copyright holder, but otherwise the

Fwd: Bug#910327: RFS: javapoet/1.11.1-1 [ITP]

Dear package maintainers, I'm looking for a sponsor for javapoet (see details of forwarded message). The package can be moved under Debian Java Maintainers, as was done for: * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/picocli , * https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gradle-apt-plugin . Or, you can leave me as m

Re: Fwd: Action requested: migration of alioth list pkg-java-maintainers

Hi! Am 28.01.2018 um 22:15 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi all, > > No objection for migrating the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list? AFAIU > the only alternative is to change the address in all maintainer fields > in the packages we maintain. I personally would like to avoid that burden. > > Emman

Fwd: Action requested: migration of alioth list pkg-java-maintainers

Hi all, No objection for migrating the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list? AFAIU the only alternative is to change the address in all maintainer fields in the packages we maintain. I personally would like to avoid that burden. Emmanuel Bourg --- Begin Message --- Dear list owner, As per the annou

Re: Fwd: A lot of packages fixed to build with jdk9

Hi Fridrich, Thanks a lot for sharing your work. FYI in Debian we opted for bumping the source/target level directly at the Ant [1] and Maven [2] level instead of patching the packages individually. So far we still have ~140 packages to fix [3] before switching the default JRE to OpenJDK 9. Emman

Fwd: A lot of packages fixed to build with jdk9

Fyi, Forwarded Message Subject: A lot of packages fixed to build with jdk9 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:42:29 +0200 From: Fridrich Strba To: IcedTea Hello, good people, In openSUSE Tumbleweed, our rolling distribution, we switched to OpenJDK9 as a default Java since a week befor

Re: Fwd: Correct way to detect JAR dependencies

Le 2/12/2016 à 00:24, Jose Gutierrez de la Concha a écrit : > Do I need to pass any params to dh maybe --with javahelper? Yes you'll need "--with javahelper", and probably a different format for the Class-Path elements. I'm not sure file:// URLs are supported, try absolute paths to the versionle

Re: Fwd: Correct way to detect JAR dependencies

Hi Emmanuel, My JAR has already a Class-Path entry in MANIFEST.MF Manifest-Version: 1.0 Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.9.7 Created-By: 1.8.0_102-8u102-b14.1-2-b14 (Oracle Corporation) Main-Class: IceGridGUI.Main Class-Path: file:///usr/share/java/ice-3.6.3.jar file:///usr/share/java/icelocatordiscove

Re: Fwd: Correct way to detect JAR dependencies

Hi Jose, For ${java:Depends} to be properly populated with the package dependencies you have to ensure the jar files in your package have a Class-Path attribute in their MANIFEST.MF file. But if you don't want to mess with the manifests you can simply put the dependencies manually in debian/contro

Fwd: Correct way to detect JAR dependencies

Hi, I trying to figure what is the correct way to declare dependencies of JAR files from other packages, I first asked this in debian-debel, but have been forwarded to this list, see forwarded message below. -- Forwarded message -- From: Jose Gutierrez de la Concha Date: Thu, De

Re: Fwd: package adjustment tomcat7: logrotate.template

Hi Beni, Thank you for reporting this issue. Could you file a bug so we can keep track of it please? Preferably for the tomcat8 package since tomcat7 is going to be removed soon. Emmanuel Bourg

Fwd: package adjustment tomcat7: logrotate.template

hi dear package maintainers, im not quite sure if im right at this mailing list, but tomc...@packages.debian.org redirected me here… i think the tomcat7 (and also the tomcat8) package should probably have an adjustment in the /usr/share/tomcat7/logrotate.temp

Fwd: eclipse: build with openjdk-7 in stretch/sid (bnd issue?)

[Please CC me as I am not in java packaging list] Hello Emmanuel and java team, Context, I am trying to build eclipse with openjdk-7 in stretch/sid like system. Sorry to disturb you. I pinged on IRC < zumbi> ebourg: I found bogus manifest in felix-gogo-shell < zumbi> it includes wrong versi

Fwd: Bug#826643: ITP: tn5250j -- A 5250 terminal emulator for the AS/400

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Java developers, I would like to package tn5250j [1], which is a good client for connecting to an AS/400 server. I have just seen that the following dependencies are required: activation.jar kunstoff.jar smtp.jar jarbundler-2.4.0.jar The jars

Re: Fwd: How to propagate mvn options to debhelper (Was: Need help to upgrade libnetlib-java package)

Le 23/04/2016 07:43, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Any further hints? The properties set in debian/maven.properties do not show up in the log. You'll just know the file is being used because the properties.file.manual parameter is added to the command line: -Dproperties.file.manual=/debian/maven

Re: Fwd: How to propagate mvn options to debhelper (Was: Need help to upgrade libnetlib-java package)

Hi, could anybody confirm whether I have followed Emmanuel's advise to specify "maven.install.skip=true" properly. It did not made any visible effect not even inside the logs and I wonder whether I might have misinterpreted something that would lead to a proper package build finally. Kind regard

Re: Fwd: How to propagate mvn options to debhelper (Was: Need help to upgrade libnetlib-java package)

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:59:51AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 23/04/2016 00:49, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > > but nothing helped. Any other ideas? > > DEB_MAVEN_ARGS is the CDBS syntax, it won't work with DH. You either > have to override the target and add a parameter (dh_auto_build -- >

Re: Fwd: How to propagate mvn options to debhelper (Was: Need help to upgrade libnetlib-java package)

Le 23/04/2016 00:49, Andreas Tille a écrit : > but nothing helped. Any other ideas? DEB_MAVEN_ARGS is the CDBS syntax, it won't work with DH. You either have to override the target and add a parameter (dh_auto_build -- -Dfoo=bar) or declare the property in debian/maven.properties (add a line wit

Re: Fwd: How to propagate mvn options to debhelper (Was: Need help to upgrade libnetlib-java package)

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:46:30PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > > >> I think this plugin is used in the maven "workflow", at install time > > > >> only, which should not be needed or required in Debian build workflow. > >

Fwd: How to propagate mvn options to debhelper (Was: Need help to upgrade libnetlib-java package)

- Mail transféré - > De: "Andreas Tille" > À: "Debian Java List" > Cc: "Debian Med Packaging Team" > Envoyé: Vendredi 22 Avril 2016 21:25:43 > Objet: How to propagate mvn options to debhelper (Was: Need help to upgrade > libnetlib-java package) > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:46:30PM

Fwd: Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer

Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:48:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:45:34 +0100 Fr

Fwd: Bug#808782: RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4)

Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#808782: RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4) Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:21:02 + Resent-From: Jerome Benoit Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors Date: Tue, 22 Dec

Fwd: Bug#808211: saxonhe: Versions 9.6 and 9.7 should be installable at the same time

(Sorry, for the double forwarding, I meant to send this to the debian-java ml, not only to pkg-java-maints.) Forwarded Message Source: saxonhe Severity: normal Dear Saxon(-HE) maintainer (and Java maintainers), The Calabash XProc processor that I am packaging [1] uses some low

Fwd: Eclipse does not start on SID/Stretch on LinuxPPC

-- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:05 AM Subject: Eclipse does not start on SID/Stretch on LinuxPPC To: icj...@gmail.com This list is used as a maintainer address for Debian packages maintained in alioth's pkg-java project. This is not a discussion list ab

Re: Fwd: A typo in the description-en of libtrilead-ssh2-java

Hi all, thanks for the information. I would normally avoid the noise of writing to a newsletter, since it isn't really a bug, but I obviously failed to find a better place to report it :) Regards On 13 October 2015 at 17:01, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 13.10.2015 um 15:47 schrieb Matthew Johns

Re: Fwd: A typo in the description-en of libtrilead-ssh2-java

Am 13.10.2015 um 15:47 schrieb Matthew Johnson: > On Tue Oct 13 15:13, Milan Antonijevic wrote: [...] >> I have noticed a typo in the package description, that *could* prevent >> someone from finding it.. >> In short: Hi Milan, this bug is already fixed [1] but thanks for contacting us. It is usu

Re: Fwd: A typo in the description-en of libtrilead-ssh2-java

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Tue Oct 13 15:13, Milan Antonijevic wrote: >> I tried writing to the @debian.org address, but it bounced with > > Hi, I'm afraid I'm no longer involved with the Debian project. I've copied the > Debian Java team list, hopefully someone th

Re: Fwd: A typo in the description-en of libtrilead-ssh2-java

On Tue Oct 13 15:13, Milan Antonijevic wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > I tried writing to the @debian.org address, but it bounced with > > The error that the other server returned was: > 550 Unrouteable address Hi, I'm afraid I'm no longer involved with the Debian project. I've copied the Debian Java t

Re: Important please read: Re: Fwd: Processing of groovy2_2.4.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Am 27.06.2015 um 16:37 schrieb Paul Wise: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> I have contacted the ftp team before but haven't received a reply so far. > > You got a reply after you left the #debian-ftp channel: > > i removed the files Thanks. But we still receive a

Re: Important please read: Re: Fwd: Processing of groovy2_2.4.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > I have contacted the ftp team before but haven't received a reply so far. You got a reply after you left the #debian-ftp channel: i removed the files -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Important please read: Re: Fwd: Processing of groovy2_2.4.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Am 27.06.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Stephen Nelson: > > I think there's some error with the upload of groovy2 as I've received > hundreds of copies of this message. > > Who should I contact/file a bug against ? The upload of groovy2 to experimental was interrupted and after that the queue daemon star

Re: Fwd: Processing of groovy2_2.4.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Or someone could dcut the upload. I would do so, but don't have access to my key. On June 27, 2015 6:19:11 AM PDT, Stephen Nelson wrote: >I think there's some error with the upload of groovy2 as I've received >hundreds of copies of this message. > >Who should I contact/file a bug against ? > >

Fwd: Processing of groovy2_2.4.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

I think there's some error with the upload of groovy2 as I've received hundreds of copies of this message. Who should I contact/file a bug against ? -- Forwarded message - From: Debian FTP Masters Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:13 Subject: Processing of groovy2_2.4.3+dfsg-1_amd64.chan

Re: Fwd: Bug#786460: ITP: kafka -- Distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service

Le 18/06/2015 16:16, Brandon Bradley a écrit : > Would it be OK to include the gradle wrapper jar as part of the > repo for building? I don't know the exact policy about binary artifacts > in dsc files. Also, what about including JARs not packaging directly > into the package? There is really no

Fwd: Bug#786460: ITP: kafka -- Distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service

Hey Emmanuel, Thanks for your reply! This is one of the big things I wanted to address first. Would it be OK to include the gradle wrapper jar as part of the repo for building? I don't know the exact policy about binary artifacts in dsc files. Also, what about including JARs not packaging directly

Fwd: oauth2 sprint at DebConf?

Hi, I'm forwarding this email here as suggested by Enrico. I replied to the original letter [1]. Will there be more java people interested in this so that we could organise a sprint at DebConf? [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/03/msg00177.html Eugene -- Forwarded message -

Re: Fwd: Re: [rt.debian.org #4815] CVE-2013-4152 XML External Entity (XXE) injection in Spring

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi Miguel, > > thank you. Did you also upload to security-master because I haven't seen > a security announce yet? Hi Markus, Yes, I also uploaded it to security-master and I'm waiting for a reply or an announcement as well. I didn't get

Re: Fwd: Re: [rt.debian.org #4815] CVE-2013-4152 XML External Entity (XXE) injection in Spring

On 30.12.2013 13:49, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: >> I have pushed the fix to the stable-security branch of the git >> repository and also applied the same changes to master. I'm hereby >> looking for a sponsor who can upload the package to stabl

Re: Fwd: Re: [rt.debian.org #4815] CVE-2013-4152 XML External Entity (XXE) injection in Spring

On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Markus Koschany wrote: > I have pushed the fix to the stable-security branch of the git > repository and also applied the same changes to master. I'm hereby > looking for a sponsor who can upload the package to stable-security > and unstable. Hi Markus, I'll take

Fwd: Re: [rt.debian.org #4815] CVE-2013-4152 XML External Entity (XXE) injection in Spring

Hi all, I have received a reply from the security team regarding the security issue in the spring framework. I'm forwarding the mail to this list as a reference. I have pushed the fix to the stable-security branch of the git repository and also applied the same changes to master. I'm hereby looki

Re: Fwd: Bug#680475: ITP: jsamp -- Java toolkit for use with the Simple Application Messaging Protocol

On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 10:46:42 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > I'm not aware of a set of established conventions for this for the Java > team, but perhaps there are some out there. Can anyone point to GBP > branch naming convention in use by another team? The conventions for pkg-perl can be found at

Re: Fwd: Bug#680475: ITP: jsamp -- Java toolkit for use with the Simple Application Messaging Protocol

On 05/28/2013 03:11 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 28/05/2013 15:42, Florian Rothmaier a écrit : > >> You could try (I give the commands from the beginning): >> >> git clone http://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/jsamp.git >> cd jsamp/ >> git checkout -b upstream origin/upstream >>

Re: Fwd: Bug#680475: ITP: jsamp -- Java toolkit for use with the Simple Application Messaging Protocol

Le 28/05/2013 15:42, Florian Rothmaier a écrit : > You could try (I give the commands from the beginning): > > git clone http://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/jsamp.git > cd jsamp/ > git checkout -b upstream origin/upstream > git checkout debian > git-buildpackage -us -uc --git-d

Re: Fwd: Bug#680475: ITP: jsamp -- Java toolkit for use with the Simple Application Messaging Protocol

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Emmanuel, thanks a lot for looking at the package! Am 28.05.2013 13:47, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Hi Florian, > > I got a quick look at the package, here are my observations: > > * Standards-Version can be updated to 3.9.4 in debian/control Th

Re: Fwd: Bug#680475: ITP: jsamp -- Java toolkit for use with the Simple Application Messaging Protocol

Hi Florian, I got a quick look at the package, here are my observations: * Standards-Version can be updated to 3.9.4 in debian/control * It fails to build with git-buildpackage because the branch is named 'debian' instead of 'master' * It still fails with git-buildpackage --git-debian-branch=de

Fwd: Bug#680475: ITP: jsamp -- Java toolkit for use with the Simple Application Messaging Protocol

Dear Debian Science and Java Team, I've updated my package "jsamp" (binary package: "libjsamp-java"). The current upstream version is "1.3-3". Moreover, the package contains a watch file and a file "debian/orig-tar.sh" which provides an "orig.tar.gz" from the upstream zip archive. The JSAMP libra

Fwd: RFP 702564: graphtea -- software framework to work on graphs

Hi Java team, I'll simply forward the mail sent to the science team. Consensus was to coordinate with you, since you're the experts on Java packaging. To make things easier, here's a list of the currently embedded copies the mail was talking about: https://github.com/graphtheorysoftware/GraphTe

Fwd: Maven auto packager idea

Forgot to cc the list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Boris Ribalkin Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:18 AM Subject: Re: Maven auto packager idea To: Thomas Koch Hi Thomas, I've tried to build them, repo helper was fine, but debian helper gave the following exception: compile:

Fwd: [JIRA] Resolved: (MSV-3) Unify licenses to a free one

FYI I'm not a DD no more but if someone interrested in dom4j, maybe this could help. Cheers, Message original Sujet: [JIRA] Resolved: (MSV-3) Unify licenses to a free one Date : Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:40:53 + (GMT+00:00) De : Martin Grebac (JIRA) Pour : av...@java.net

Fwd: Fwd: Bug#694418: ITP: fits -- Java library for the I/O handling of FITS files

Original-Nachricht Betreff: Fwd: Bug#694418: ITP: fits -- Java library for the I/O handling of FITS files Datum: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:15:58 +0100 Von: Florian Rothmaier An: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Florian Rothmaier * Package

Re: Fwd: any idea how to move dir in SVN?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 7/10/12 7:59 AM, tony mancill a écrit : > On 07/09/2012 02:31 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2012-07-09 11:25, Olivier Sallou wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> the package libbzip2-java is wrongly named libjbib2-java in SVN. >>> Any idea on how to rename i

Re: Fwd: any idea how to move dir in SVN?

On 2012-07-09 11:25, Olivier Sallou wrote: > > Hi, > the package libbzip2-java is wrongly named libjbib2-java in SVN. > Any idea on how to rename it on SVN ? > > The svn mv would need to get the whole trunk/packages section, which I > don"t have and don't really want to download. > Or if someone

Fwd: any idea how to move dir in SVN?

Hi, the package libbzip2-java is wrongly named libjbib2-java in SVN. Any idea on how to rename it on SVN ? The svn mv would need to get the whole trunk/packages section, which I don"t have and don't really want to download. Or if someone already has the whole section downloaded, would you mind re

Fwd: UDS Sponsorship Now Open

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Team Sponsorship for the next Ubuntu Developer Summit has just opened. I think that two key Java transitions are going to fall into the next release of Ubuntu which will coincide with the next release of Debian: Java 7 and Maven 3. I will be ra

Fwd: Default target Java for OpenJDK7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Forwarding to debian-java list for wider discussion... Switching the default target at the JDK level is a no-go as it will break compatibility with upstream behaviour. Anyone else got any ideas as to how to approach this issue? Cheers James - --

Re: Fwd: RFS:opensearchserver package

Emmanuel Keller: > Hi Everyone, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package of OpenSearchServer. I sent an > RFS to the debian-mentors list two days ago. > > As OpenSearchServer is a JAVA application running into TOMCAT, I thought > the DEBIAN/JAVA community is a good place to find help ! > >

Fwd: RFS:opensearchserver package

Hi Everyone, I am looking for a sponsor for my package of OpenSearchServer. I sent an RFS to the debian-mentors list two days ago. As OpenSearchServer is a JAVA application running into TOMCAT, I thought the DEBIAN/JAVA community is a good place to find help ! Thank you if you can have a look,

Fwd: Bug#643498: cobertura-maven-plugin: FTBFS: Error building POM

Hi team, I have been solving bugs like this by adding a Build-Depends on libmaven-plugin-tools-java but I wonder if I'm solving just a symptom and not the real bug that could be somewhere else. Does anybody have an idea why several packages began to require org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-p

Fwd: Status of jai-imageio-core

FYI. Here is my attempt at packaging jai-imageio-core & jai-core. On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > [...] >> I did not heard any news about this since then and did not found the >> time to pick it up because I have

Re: Java's SVN not reachable on Alioth [Fwd: Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

Hi all, Le mercredi 06 juillet 2011 16:17:22, tony mancill a écrit : > On 07/02/2011 11:47 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > > On 03/07/11 00:49, gregor herrmann wrote: > >> The alioth admins have removed the ancient pkg-perl CVS repo on my > >> request, I guess that's also the way to go for the java team

Fwd: package "eclipse" for testing

to end this adventure (installing eclipse on testing) : adding unstable in sources.list and #apt-get install eclipse -t unstable >gave me an error "E: internal error, could not perform immediate configuration (2) on perl" it's a perl error seems but was tired to sort it out, it's "UNSTABLE" after a

Fwd: package "eclipse" for testing

Hi Eric, debian-java@lists.debian.org is the list to go. I forward your message. > hello, seems that generic package "eclipse" doesn't exists on "testing" > (wheezy) > i have on my sources.lists only testing main contrib non-free and it's > stuck to 3.2.2-6.1 even if squeeze is on 3.5. > i could

Re: Fwd: RFS: lucene3

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Please reply to debian-java@l.d.o, it's easier for other people to track > progress on mailing lists than on private emails :) > BTW, are you subscribed to this list ? > Sorry, I keep forgetting to reply to the list. I am subscribed and

Re: Fwd: RFS: lucene3

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:24:52 +0100, Mat Scales wrote: > Hi Damien Hi! Please reply to debian-java@l.d.o, it's easier for other people to track progress on mailing lists than on private emails :) BTW, are you subscribed to this list ? > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan > wro

Re: Fwd: RFS: lucene3

Hi Damien On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > YMMV, but if you want this package to be sponsored by Debian Java Team, > you'll have to commit your package into > one of our repository. You have multiple options to acheive this : > 1) You can merge your changes into exis

Re: Fwd: RFS: lucene3

> On 2011-08-22 11:45, Mat Scales wrote: >> Hello all, Hi Mat, FTR, I've already had some private discussion with Mat regarding this package and why he didn't use existing work from Jan-Pascal. I think that Mat feedback warrants the reworks of debian packaging scripts. >> I am forwarding a Reque

Re: Fwd: RFS: lucene3

On 2011-08-22 11:45, Mat Scales wrote: > Hello all, > > I am forwarding a Request For Sponsorship I made on debian-mentors as > apparently you guys are the people to ask. > > Regarding not using Jan-Pascal van Best's work as a starting point, it is > due to having already got a working package do

Fwd: RFS: lucene3

Hello all, I am forwarding a Request For Sponsorship I made on debian-mentors as apparently you guys are the people to ask. Regarding not using Jan-Pascal van Best's work as a starting point, it is due to having already got a working package done on my own before I was able to find Jan-Pascal's w

Re: Java's SVN not reachable on Alioth [Fwd: Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

On 07/02/2011 11:47 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > On 03/07/11 00:49, gregor herrmann wrote: >> The alioth admins have removed the ancient pkg-perl CVS repo on my >> request, I guess that's also the way to go for the java team. >> >> Cheers, >> gregor, who suggests to ask friendly on the #alioth channel

Re: Java's SVN not reachable on Alioth [Fwd: Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

On 03/07/11 00:49, gregor herrmann wrote: The alioth admins have removed the ancient pkg-perl CVS repo on my request, I guess that's also the way to go for the java team. Cheers, gregor, who suggests to ask friendly on the #alioth channel Thanks for the advice, but I guess that means we need fir

Re: Java's SVN not reachable on Alioth [Fwd: Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:59:46 +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > > From http://titanpad.com/yyhfwA9Pyr : > > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/ doesn't allow to browse SVN > > repositories > > when (old, conflicting) CVS repositories are kept alive (ex: pkg-samba, > > pkg-perl). > I belie

Re: Java's SVN not reachable on Alioth [Fwd: Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

On 02/07/11 20:45, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Le samedi 02 juillet 2011 21:31:43, Eric Lavarde a écrit : >> Hello, > > Hi Eric, > >> I sent the below email to Roland before my holiday but didn't get any >> answer and the problem is still there. >> >> Does one of you have a more direct access to

Re: Java's SVN not reachable on Alioth [Fwd: Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

Le samedi 02 juillet 2011 21:31:43, Eric Lavarde a écrit : > Hello, Hi Eric, > I sent the below email to Roland before my holiday but didn't get any > answer and the problem is still there. > > Does one of you have a more direct access to Roland or anybody else able > to solve or advise on how t

Java's SVN not reachable on Alioth [Fwd: Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

Hello, I sent the below email to Roland before my holiday but didn't get any answer and the problem is still there. Does one of you have a more direct access to Roland or anybody else able to solve or advise on how to solve the issue? Thanks, Eric Original Message Subject

Fwd: OpenJDK7 on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD

Hi Java Team, [Sorry, I forgot to add debian-java in my original CC, original Message-id is <201106232327.53814.draz...@drazzib.com>] FYI, I'm currently trying to port OpenJDK7 to kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 arch. Not ready for prime time yet but I hope to get something working during sum

Fwd: gtk-look and feel for KDE SC/oxygen

Just moving this to the discussion list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Fabi Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:28 PM Subject: gtk-look and feel for KDE SC/oxygen To: pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hello. I want to ask something. For the KDE SC there is now a gtk theme (o

Fwd: Re: [RFS] junit, apache-log4j1.2, libjdom1-java

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 GAH! Meant this to be a list reply. Sorry for the double email Ludovic. - Original Message Subject: Re: [RFS] junit, apache-log4j1.2, libjdom1-java Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:53:03 +0100 From: Niels Thykier To: Ludovic Claude O

Re: Fwd: Re: Joining the pkg-java team

On 20:35 12/21/10, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Le mardi 21 décembre 2010 19:38:53, Xavier Oswald a écrit : > > Hi, > > Hi Xavier, > > Welcome aboard (I've just accepted you on alioth) ! Thx. > > Im planning to join the pkg-java team with Olivier who is in cc. > > Maybe Olivier is in BCC but I h

Fwd: RFS: i2p

Original Message Subject: RFS: i2p Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:19:52 -0700 From: hungryh...@i2pmail.org Reply-To: hungryh...@i2pmail.org To: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "i2p". * Package name: i2p Version

Fwd: compile fop to elf

Dear Debian-Java people, I have received this email this morning. I am absolutely no java expert (I just needed fop), so I would really appreciate if someone could give an answer to this email. Thanks ! -- Forwarded message -- From: Mark Mill Date: Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:19 P

Re: RFS: cpptasks (fwd to d-j...@l.d.o)

Sponsored. Cheers, tony On 07/23/2010 05:35 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2010-07-24 00:29, Chris Baines wrote: >> Dear mentors, > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpptasks". > >> * Package name: cpptasks >> Version : 1.0~b5-1 >> Upstream Author : Unknown >> * URL

Re: RFS: cpptasks (fwd to d-j...@l.d.o)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-07-24 00:29, Chris Baines wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpptasks". > > * Package name: cpptasks > Version : 1.0~b5-1 > Upstream Author : Unknown > * URL : > http://ant-cont

Re: Sponsor needed [Fwd: 'knopflerfish-osgi' uploaded to mentors.debian.net]

Hi Eric, On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > could someone sponsor the below package? I have added the --force-download option to uscan. I wonder if the filename framework.jar is too generic. Maybe knopflerfish-framework.jar would be better? I could not find the source code

  1   2   3   >