On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:18:33AM +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 08:29 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Well not stock. It will need a non-free jdk but it will work.
> > In unstable it works with free jdks. They are more advanced.
> That's OK with me. I use Java on Debian fo
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 08:29 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Well not stock. It will need a non-free jdk but it will work.
> In unstable it works with free jdks. They are more advanced.
That's OK with me. I use Java on Debian for my customers and they insist
on using the Sun JVM any way.
If you need
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:24:08AM +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> > I work to make it possible to be able to backport my Eclipse to Sarge
> > too. Thats half done currently. I dont promise any timeframe for this.
> A backport to a *stock* Sarge would really be nice (to use an
> understatement).
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 07:39 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> That FAQ is still correct. I use the same trick for my Eclipse packages
> which will get uploaded to unstable soon.
OK, thanks for the answer.
> I work to make it possible to be able to backport my Eclipse to Sarge
> too. Thats half done cur
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:35:03PM +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an Eclipse version for Debian Sarge AMD64 that natively
> supports the SWT browser widget or does the FAQ entry
> (http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#browserlinux) still applies?
That FAQ is still correct. I us
Hi,
Is there an Eclipse version for Debian Sarge AMD64 that natively
supports the SWT browser widget or does the FAQ entry
(http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#browserlinux) still applies?
--
Groeten,
Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-5185527
6 matches
Mail list logo
