Re: Dependency problem with libbcel-java

2003-01-30 Thread Ben Burton
> Shouldn't it be: > > Depends: j2sdk (>= 1.3) | java-common (or java2-common?) Hi. I think (assuming the package requires java2 to run) that what you want is: Depends: j2re1.4 | java2-runtime Only the JVMs themselves actually depend on java{,2}-common. The apps depend on java{1,2}-runtime

Re: Dependency problem with libbcel-java

2003-01-30 Thread Ben Burton
> Shouldn't it be: > > Depends: j2sdk (>= 1.3) | java-common (or java2-common?) Hi. I think (assuming the package requires java2 to run) that what you want is: Depends: j2re1.4 | java2-runtime Only the JVMs themselves actually depend on java{,2}-common. The apps depend on java{1,2}-runtime

Dependency problem with libbcel-java

2003-01-30 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Takashi, -- bcel-5.0.99.cvs20030103/debian/control -- Depends: j2sdk1.3 | j2re1.3 -- bcel-5.0.99.cvs20030103/debian/control -- Shouldn't it be: Depends: j2sdk (>= 1.3) | java-common (or java2-common?) Takashi, I send it to the list because I'm not shure for the dependency of java?-common. Than

Dependency problem with libbcel-java

2003-01-30 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Takashi, -- bcel-5.0.99.cvs20030103/debian/control -- Depends: j2sdk1.3 | j2re1.3 -- bcel-5.0.99.cvs20030103/debian/control -- Shouldn't it be: Depends: j2sdk (>= 1.3) | java-common (or java2-common?) Takashi, I send it to the list because I'm not shure for the dependency of java?-common. Than