[Matthias Klose]
> apparently before java-gcj-compat-plugin entered the archive,
> equivalent with the classpath-0.92 release.
Yes, that is correct. Did you test recently? Did most of them work?
Currently I worry that the free Java applet viewer will be thrown out
of Etch because of #267040.
Hi,
> Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
>> The most important feature is java applet support. Some of the
>> important test cases are listed on
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/JavaInDebianEdu>. Last time I
>> tested, few of them were working properly in Etch with gcjappletviewer.
>> :(
>
> apparen
On Thursday 02 November 2006 23:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
> > The most important feature is java applet support. Some of the
> > important test cases are listed on
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/JavaInDebianEdu>. Last time I
> > tested, few of them were working
Petter Reinholdtsen writes:
> The most important feature is java applet support. Some of the
> important test cases are listed on
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/JavaInDebianEdu>. Last time I
> tested, few of them were working properly in Etch with gcjappletviewer. :(
apparently before java-g
[Matthias Klose]
> that kind of attitude will lead to a depopulation of java packages in
> main and java support just for two architectures. If that's your goal,
> please go on.
>
> It seems that even debian-edu is in favour of this approach putting
> non-free components on their CDs.
I'm glad to
5 matches
Mail list logo
