Re: Considering removal of kaffe

Hello, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:53:24PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Michael Koch wrote: > > Yes, we need to remove kaffe. I think we dont need bugs against te packages > > maintained by pkg-java. I will work on them and remove (build-)deps on kaffe > > in th

Re: Considering removal of kaffe

Hi Michael, On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Michael Koch wrote: > Yes, we need to remove kaffe. I think we dont need bugs against te packages > maintained by pkg-java. I will work on them and remove (build-)deps on kaffe > in the next days. thanks. The current list of packages:

Re: Considering removal of kaffe

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:53:22PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi > > After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance > both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an > 120 days old "FTBFS" RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I > figured

Re: Considering removal of kaffe

Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi > > After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance > both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an > 120 days old "FTBFS" RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I > figured perhaps it was time to retire kaffe from t

Re: Considering removal of kaffe

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi > > After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance > both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an > 120 days old "FTBFS" RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I > figured perhaps i

Considering removal of kaffe

Hi After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an 120 days old "FTBFS" RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I figured perhaps it was time to retire kaffe from the repositories. I have appended