Re: Comments regarding scala-pickling_0.10.1-1_amd64.changes

2017-04-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Frederic, On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 03:46:34PM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > > Well, may be we discussed this previously and I simply forgot. Please > > keep in mind that I'm doing lots of stuff and might forget something we > > agreed upon before. Feel free to remind me about this. ;-) > >

Re: Comments regarding scala-pickling_0.10.1-1_amd64.changes

2017-04-14 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Hi Andreas, On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:24:53 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Frederic, > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > > > I took the freedom to copy your mail to Debian Java list where this > > > discussion seems to belong to. If you agree please stick to l

Re: Comments regarding scala-pickling_0.10.1-1_amd64.changes

2017-04-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Frederic, On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > > I took the freedom to copy your mail to Debian Java list where this > > discussion seems to belong to. If you agree please stick to list > > discussion. > > yes, no problem. :-) > > So we are only 10 packages a

Re: Comments regarding scala-pickling_0.10.1-1_amd64.changes

2017-04-12 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Hi, On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:21:05 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Frederic, > > I took the freedom to copy your mail to Debian Java list where this > discussion seems to belong to. If you agree please stick to list > discussion. yes, no problem. > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:58:42PM +0200, Fre

Re: Comments regarding scala-pickling_0.10.1-1_amd64.changes

2017-04-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Frederic, I took the freedom to copy your mail to Debian Java list where this discussion seems to belong to. If you agree please stick to list discussion. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:58:42PM +0200, Frederic Bonnard wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:48:27 +0200, Andreas Tille wr