Re: New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-20 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Jul 20 10:41, Alexander Holupirek wrote: > I would propose to indicate that clearly when generating a template > using jh_makepkg (as it automatically adds mvn-debian when choosing > a maven build system). Please find attached a patch against > javatools-0.31 for that purpose. A better opt

Re: New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-20 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, the comment at the beginning of the script is: # This is an example script that allows running maven on the command # line in a similar way as our cdbs snippets work. Production use is # not supported by the maintainer of maven-debian-helper. We could improve it but this will need some time

Re: New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-20 Thread Alexander Holupirek
Hi, thanks for clarifying that mvn-debian should not be used for real packaging tasks. Just out of curiosity, why is that the case (I did not have any troubles so far)? I would propose to indicate that clearly when generating a template using jh_makepkg (as it automatically adds mvn-debian when

Re: New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-18 Thread Ludovic Claude
Hello, I confirm, mvn-debian should not be used for real packaging tasks. If you package a project which uses Maven, then in a nutshell you should: - install the package maven-debian-helper - run mh_make from the root directory of the project sources. I will improve documentation on this, than

Re: New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-17 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sat Jul 17 08:40, Alexander Holupirek wrote: > > I am working on this, I've just written a talk on Javahelper to give at > > Debconf > > this year, which I'll make available later, and I've been writing example > > sample packages using Javahelper (and dh7, not cdbs) here: > > > > http://pkg-j

Re: New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-16 Thread Alexander Holupirek
On 16.07.2010, at 01:30, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Thu Jul 15 12:14, Alexander Holupirek wrote: >> To make a long story short. A list on the available helpers, their current >> status and a link on how they should be used (or not) would be a great help >> for novices. >> > I am working on this,

Re: New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-15 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Thu Jul 15 12:14, Alexander Holupirek wrote: > To make a long story short. A list on the available helpers, their current > status and a link on how they should be used (or not) would be a great help > for novices. > I am working on this, I've just written a talk on Javahelper to give at Debco

New section for 'Building Java Packages' (relating to [RFC: update to our website (on Alioth)])

2010-07-15 Thread Alexander Holupirek
> 03_remove_package_list.diff: Remove outdated package list on our index page > > [1] http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/ > > Cheers, Hi, I would like to propose an additional section on the 'Building Java Packages in Debian' webpage regarding the available helpers. I rece

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] [Solved] Re: Building java packages with sbuild.

2010-06-14 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:54:08PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Roger Leigh a écrit : > When I was trying to solve my problem by myself, I looked for “/proc” as a > keyword in the documentation and did not find a hint that not having it > mounted > was a

[Solved] Re: Building java packages with sbuild.

2010-06-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Roger Leigh a écrit : > > Are you using sbuild with sudo or schroot ($chroot_mode in > sbuild.conf)? > > If you're using sudo, the chroot setup is entirely down to you, and > you need to make sure /proc, /sys etc. are mounted e.g. in your > fstab. sudo i

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] Building java packages with sbuild.

2010-05-30 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 01:50:05PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Dear all, > > since openjdk-6 version 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1, uploaded in Debian as 6b18-1.8-1, > configuration of openjdk-6-jre-headless and ca-certificates-java fail if /proc > is not mounted. > > On my default sbuild installation, pr

Building java packages with sbuild.

2010-05-27 Thread Charles Plessy
Dear all, since openjdk-6 version 6b18-1.8-0ubuntu1, uploaded in Debian as 6b18-1.8-1, configuration of openjdk-6-jre-headless and ca-certificates-java fail if /proc is not mounted. On my default sbuild installation, proc is indeed not mounted and I can not use it anymore to prepare my uploads th

Re: Building java packages

2001-01-15 Thread Stefan Gybas
Egon Willighagen wrote: > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/jmol

Re: Building java packages

2001-01-15 Thread Stefan Gybas
Egon Willighagen wrote: > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/jmo

Re: Building java packages

2001-01-15 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Monday 15 January 2001 20:15, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]: > > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/multi.jar > > > > Should i just disregard these warnings? > > Never having used the debian packaging tools, my guess says that you

Re: Building java packages

2001-01-15 Thread Seth Arnold
* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]: > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-o

Building java packages

2001-01-15 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi all, currently i am registered as a debian maintainer wannabe :) I am packaging a java deb: Jmol, a molecular viewer and got this error with lintian: W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar W:

Re: Building java packages

2001-01-15 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Monday 15 January 2001 20:15, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]: > > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/multi.jar > > > > Should i just disregard these warnings? > > Never having used the debian packaging tools, my guess says that you

Re: Building java packages

2001-01-15 Thread Seth Arnold
* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]: > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-

Building java packages

2001-01-15 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi all, currently i am registered as a debian maintainer wannabe :) I am packaging a java deb: Jmol, a molecular viewer and got this error with lintian: W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar W:

Re: building java packages

2001-01-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 26 December 2000, at 20 h 51, the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I choose to use jikes, I need some class libraries installed. I'm > thinking of packaging classpath-0.01. jikes works fine with kaffe's classes.

Re: building java packages

2001-01-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 26 December 2000, at 16 h 2, the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. The current scheme where library .jars go into > /usr/share/java/[repository], doesn't seem to take into account > versioning. There is also no mention of versioning in the Java policy for > /usr/s

Re: building java packages

2001-01-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 26 December 2000, at 20 h 51, the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I choose to use jikes, I need some class libraries installed. I'm > thinking of packaging classpath-0.01. jikes works fine with kaffe's classes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: building java packages

2001-01-02 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 26 December 2000, at 16 h 2, the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. The current scheme where library .jars go into > /usr/share/java/[repository], doesn't seem to take into account > versioning. There is also no mention of versioning in the Java policy for > /usr/

Re: building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 08:51:08PM +, John Leuner wrote: > > java-compiler > > (currently: > > jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 > > ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 > > jikes 1.10-6 > > java-compiler-dummy 0.2 > > guavac 1.2-2 > > gcj 1:2.95.2-20) > > assuming jdk1.1-dev is the ibm jdk: > > a) are we allowe

Re: building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 08:51:08PM +, John Leuner wrote: > > java-compiler > > (currently: > > jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 > > ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 > > jikes 1.10-6 > > java-compiler-dummy 0.2 > > guavac 1.2-2 > > gcj 1:2.95.2-20) > > assuming jdk1.1-dev is the ibm jdk: > > a) are we allow

Re: building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread John Leuner
> > I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some > > problems: > > > > 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? > > java-compiler > (currently: > jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 > ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 > jikes 1.10-6 > java-compiler-dummy 0.2 > guavac 1.2-2 > gcj

Re: building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread John Leuner
> > I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some > > problems: > > > > 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? > > java-compiler > (currently: > jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 > ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 > jikes 1.10-6 > java-compiler-dummy 0.2 > guavac 1.2-2 > gcj

Re: building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:02:12PM +, John Leuner wrote: > I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some > problems: > > 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? java-compiler (currently: jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 jikes 1.10-6 java-

building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread John Leuner
I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some problems: 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? 2. when I want to compile something with a line like: javac -classpath /some/dir:/some/other/dir some_java_files this won't work because the classpath also

Re: building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:02:12PM +, John Leuner wrote: > I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some > problems: > > 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? java-compiler (currently: jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 jikes 1.10-6 java

building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread John Leuner
I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some problems: 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? 2. when I want to compile something with a line like: javac -classpath /some/dir:/some/other/dir some_java_files this won't work because the classpath also