Description : Helper tools for building Eclipse related packages
This project contains helper tools to ease the packaging of Eclipse related
projects. These projects often consist in a collection of bundles built with
Tycho. Since Tycho isn't fully usable in Debian yet this package provid
Hi,
I would like to try building Eclipse from the SVN repo. How is the orig
tarball built? Where do the parts come from?
$ tar tzf eclipse_3.2.1.orig.tar.gz
eclipse-3.2.1.orig/
eclipse-3.2.1.orig/upstream/
eclipse-3.2.1.orig/upstream/eclipse-sourceBuild-srcIncluded-3.2.1.tar.bz2
eclipse-3.2.1
t with apt source lines
> >pointing to sarge, experimental and a local repository containing
> >jsch_0.1.19-1 packages.
> >
> >All the declared build dependancies are met but when building eclipse it
> >errors with the following display:
> >
> >
&g
es.
>
>All the declared build dependancies are met but when building eclipse it
>errors with the following display:
>
>
>ln -sf /usr/share/java/regexp.jar $plugin_dir/jakarta-regexp-1.3.jar && \
>ln -sf /usr/share/java/mx4j.jar $plugin_dir/mx4j-jmx.jar && \
1.19-1 packages.
All the declared build dependancies are met but when building eclipse it
errors with the following display:
ln -sf /usr/share/java/regexp.jar $plugin_dir/jakarta-regexp-1.3.jar && \
ln -sf /usr/share/java/mx4j.jar $plugin_dir/mx4j-jmx.jar && \
test $(find $plugin_
* Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At least the next build will e a real improvment :) There will be
> some other major chnages, as lintian wants me to change the eclipse
> dir to /usr/share/eclipse... Expect testing packages at the
> beginning of next week... I hope your still willing to he
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Send a note to the gnome-vfs maintainer about it; possibly the pkg-config
>> > data is being generated incorrectly.
>> done... Does anyone know a way around it?
> You _could_ manipulate the output from pkg-config to match what you feel it
> should be
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dh_strip -a
> strip: Warning: Output file cannot represent architecture UNKNOWN!
[...]
No idea about this... Have to google a bit more... Hm...
could you do a
strip -s -v source-tree/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk/os/linux/x86/*so
and include this line i
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:05:19PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> * Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is this a Bug? How can I work around this? I don't want to
> >> make this static, but keep the pkg-config call? Using sed
> >> or suchlike?
> > Send a note to the gnome-vfs maintainer a
* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is this a Bug? How can I work around this? I don't want to
>> make this static, but keep the pkg-config call? Using sed
>> or suchlike?
> Send a note to the gnome-vfs maintainer about it; possibly the pkg-config
> data is being generated incorrectly.
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:20:37PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Very strange:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pkg-config --cflags gnome-vfs-2.0
> -pthread -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include
> -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/gli
* Keegan Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The '-pthread' linker option is used on some platforms (OpenBSD AFAIK) to
> trigger linkage of threading code. The Linux eqivalent is '-lpthread' -
> usually simply changing it wherever it occurs is sufficient.
Very strange:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pkg-c
Jan,
Many thanks for your mail. Here is the result from last night (I build
the Eclipse package during the night ;-) ):
[...]
dpkg-deb: building package `eclipse-javac' in
`../eclipse-javac_2.1-4_all.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package `eclipse-jdt' in `../eclipse-jdt_2.1-4_all.deb'.
dpkg-deb: build
On Tuesday 13 May 2003 03:01 pm, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Now it compiles, but I get an error from ld:
> ld -o libswt-gnome-gtk-2133.so gnome.o -x \
> -shared `pkg-config --libs gnome-vfs-2.0`
> ld: unrecognized option '-pthread'
> ld: use the --help option for usage information
> make[1]: *** [li
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it is! I've got the additional icon.xpm in source-tree
Strange... Anyway, as this copying was the only thing what the
ant-task was usefull for, this is now done in debian/rules...
> No! j2sdk from blackdown (1.3)... I'm reinstalling the blackdown
Jan Schulz wrote:
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# fakeroot debian/rules build-java-stamp
-> eclipse and icon.xpm should be in there.
OK, everything is OK
So no additional copying?
Yes it is! I've got the additional icon.xpm in source-tree
Ok, java is already compiled...
It seems ;-)
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> # fakeroot debian/rules build-java-stamp
>> -> eclipse and icon.xpm should be in there.
> OK, everything is OK
So no additional copying?
>> If the icon.xpm is not copied, I will change the way copying is
>> done. Should anyway happen, as the precomp
Jan Schulz wrote:
* I wrote:
# fakeroot debian/rules build
-> check what's in /source-tree. There should now be the icon.xpm
Hm, I'm not totally sure, what's happening here, but this seems like
a bug somewhere... If icon.xpm isn't there, please do a
cd source-tree; cp plugins/platform-launcher/bin
* I wrote:
> # fakeroot debian/rules build
> -> check what's in /source-tree. There should now be the icon.xpm
> Hm, I'm not totally sure, what's happening here, but this seems like
> a bug somewhere... If icon.xpm isn't there, please do a
> cd source-tree; cp plugins/platform-launcher/bin/linux/g
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to re-build eclipse on my ppc but...
> cp: cannot stat `/archives/debian/other/eclipse-2.1/source-tree/icon.xpm':
> No such file or directory
> Is it because a previous error in the build process? My buffer is too
> short :-(
> Is it possibl
I'm trying to re-build eclipse on my ppc but...
[...]
inflating:
/archives/debian/other/eclipse-2.1/build-tree/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.source_2.1.0/src/org.eclipse.ui.externaltools_2.1.0/about.html
inflating:
/archives/debian/other/eclipse-2.1/build-tree/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.sou
The problem is the new libc recently made available in unstable. It
breaks a number of Java implementations, so the problem is not with
eclipse. The solution is to upgrade to SDK1.4.1, since also 1.4.0 and
1.3.x has this problem for both Sun and Blackdown distributions. The
alternative is to dow
The problem is the new libc recently made available in unstable. It
breaks a number of Java implementations, so the problem is not with
eclipse. The solution is to upgrade to SDK1.4.1, since also 1.4.0 and
1.3.x has this problem for both Sun and Blackdown distributions. The
alternative is to dow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm using the latest ant (Apache Ant version 1.5 compiled on July 11
2002) and blackdown (Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition
(build Blackdown-1.3.1-02b-FCS)) packages on my debian unstable system.
I've downloaded the eclipse-sourceBuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm using the latest ant (Apache Ant version 1.5 compiled on July 11
2002) and blackdown (Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition
(build Blackdown-1.3.1-02b-FCS)) packages on my debian unstable system.
I've downloaded the eclipse-sourceBu
25 matches
Mail list logo
