However, Kaffe is the only thing that I maintain so I am loathe to give it up
entirely. I would be happy to share the burden of maintaining Kaffe with a
number of people in the same manner as the X-strike force. I'm also able to
dedicate hardware, bandwidth and other facilities thanks to my rol
Hi,
I'm very interrseting in co-maintaining kaffe!
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, my interests aren't entirely selfish.
>
> - It will save me a lot of effort if we have team maintainership and I can
> still look like I do something useful.
>
> - I might actually get this enter
Ean Schuessler wrote:
However, Kaffe is the only thing that I maintain so I am loathe to give it up
entirely. I would be happy to share the burden of maintaining Kaffe with a
I don't think you have to maintain packages to stay a Debian developer,
especially if you are SPI's president. :-)
numb
Oh, my interests aren't entirely selfish.
- It will save me a lot of effort if we have team maintainership and I can
still look like I do something useful.
- I might actually get this enterprise stuff to be 100% Free Software which
would let me use it for SPI + Debian, etc.
I think that it wou
My first problem is that I apparently didn't see an error message from dupload
when I was trying to upload 1.1.2. I just finally read the anonymous-ftp
upload procedure but the NMUs seem quite a bit ahead of me.
The truth is that I should give Debian up for adoption because I don't have
the tim
Tom Tromey writes:
> > "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ben> It seems then that this bug belongs to the gcj-3.3 package, which was
> Ben> generating the incorrect bytecode. I'm reassigning this accordingly.
>
> Any chance you could try gcj cvs? If this bug remains I'd lik
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> It seems then that this bug belongs to the gcj-3.3 package, which was
Ben> generating the incorrect bytecode. I'm reassigning this accordingly.
Any chance you could try gcj cvs? If this bug remains I'd like to
get a bugzilla entry for i
Many thanks Ben!
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> reassign 210716 gcj-3.3
> thanks
>
>> So basically, jython has been compiled by a buggy compiler ;)
>
> Confirmed: I've just uploaded a new jython package that builds using
> jikes-gij instead of gcj, and the problem goes away. Of course
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So basically, jython has been compiled by a buggy compiler ;) The JVM
> Spec 2nd Edition says in $4.7.3 'The Code Attribute' : [snip]
[...]
> WARNING Bad bytecode! Illegal exception table: start_pc=sth not lower
> than end_pc=sth in method something_el
Ben Burton wrote:
reassign 210716 gcj-3.3
thanks
So basically, jython has been compiled by a buggy compiler ;)
Confirmed: I've just uploaded a new jython package that builds using
jikes-gij instead of gcj, and the problem goes away. Of course jython
still crashes with kaffe, but that's just the
reassign 210716 gcj-3.3
thanks
> So basically, jython has been compiled by a buggy compiler ;)
Confirmed: I've just uploaded a new jython package that builds using
jikes-gij instead of gcj, and the problem goes away. Of course jython
still crashes with kaffe, but that's just the old "specifying
Dalibor Topic wrote:
I'll check it into kaffe's CVS as the current assert is not very user
friendly. I'll change the warning message, though, to
Done, checked in into kaffe's CVS.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Hi Mark, hi all,
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 03:12, Ben Burton wrote:
#210716 jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error
,
| Version: 1:1.1.1-1
|
| > After removing the JNI lines from jython shell script (see
| > issue #207998) kaffe
reopen 207998
thanks
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The bugs are resolved in the release of Kaffe in Debian (1.1.1) and
>> should have been closed by the Kaffe maintainer.
>
> Umm, based on the current (1.1.1-5.2) Kaffe changelogs, not al
Hi,
On Sat, 2003-12-27 at 23:51, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Umm, based on the current (1.1.1-5.2) Kaffe changelogs, not all of
> them are closed. The latest upstream changelog entry is from
> 2003-08-03 whereas bug #207998 is fixed with changelog entry of
> 2003-10-06.
BTW. Why is Debian using such a
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The bugs are resolved in the release of Kaffe in Debian (1.1.1) and
> should have been closed by the Kaffe maintainer.
Umm, based on the current (1.1.1-5.2) Kaffe changelogs, not all of
them are closed. The latest upstream changelog entry is from
2003-0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Many thanks for your work, I'm about to close some bugs from kaffe, many
>> thanks.
>
> It looks from Dalibor's mail that the bugs were closed only in upstream
> kaffe. If the bugs are still present in debian
> Many thanks for your work, I'm about to close some bugs from kaffe, many
> thanks.
It looks from Dalibor's mail that the bugs were closed only in upstream
kaffe. If the bugs are still present in debian, they must remain open
in the debian BTS. You can add the tag fixedupstream to let people k
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 03:12, Ben Burton wrote:
> > > #210716 jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error
> > >
> > > ,
> > > | Version: 1:1.1.1-1
> > > |
> > > | > After removing the JNI lines from jython shell script (see
> > > | > issue #207998)
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
>> 1° Is it a bug in the Debian package or is it a problem in Kaffe?
>> 2° Is it resolved or does it still exist?
>>
>> #136148 kaffe's ClassLoader.getSystemResource( "foo/" ) returns null
>>
>> ,
>> | Ve
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
>> 1° Is it a bug in the Debian package or is it a problem in Kaffe?
>> 2° Is it resolved or does it still exist?
>>
>> #207998 kaffe: Passing extra JNI directories breaks bootstrap classes
>>
>> ,
>> | V
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to know the status of some bugs from Kaffe. Dalibor, if you
>> don't have all the answers, I'll send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For each bugs, I'd like to know if:
>
> Hi Arnaud,
Hi Dalibor,
Many than
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to know the status of some bugs from Kaffe. Dalibor, if you
>> don't have all the answers, I'll send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For each bugs, I'd like to know if:
>
> Hi Arnaud,
Hi Dalibor,
Many than
severity 210716 important
thanks
> > #210716 jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error
> >
> > ,
> > | Version: 1:1.1.1-1
> > |
> > | > After removing the JNI lines from jython shell script (see
> > | > issue #207998) kaffe dies with kaffe-bin: mach
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know the status of some bugs from Kaffe. Dalibor, if you
don't have all the answers, I'll send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For each bugs, I'd like to know if:
Hi Arnaud,
1° Is it a bug in the Debian package or is it a problem in Kaffe?
2° Is it resolved o
Hi all,
I'd like to know the status of some bugs from Kaffe. Dalibor, if you
don't have all the answers, I'll send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For each bugs, I'd like to know if:
1° Is it a bug in the Debian package or is it a problem in Kaffe?
2° Is it resolved or does it still exist?
#207998 k
26 matches
Mail list logo
