On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:47:14PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > I think nobody wants to switch default-jdk to 17 or even not ship
> > 11 at all any more or stop supporting it during bullseye’s lifetime.
> > Maybe that also wa
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I think nobody wants to switch default-jdk to 17 or even not ship
> 11 at all any more or stop supporting it during bullseye’s lifetime.
> Maybe that also was too implicit?
Exactly, the supported Java release for the entire Bullsey
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11/18/20 8:03 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > New OpenJDK versions tend to cause both buildtime and runtime breakages
> > in reverse dependencies, some of them hard to resolve and requiring
> > updates to new upstream versions which in turn require new dep
3 matches
Mail list logo
