Hi Emmanuel,
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:30:28PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/12/2013 21:29, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > I wonder how large the effort might be to port libpixelmed-java which is
> > (currently) the only Build-Depends of libjai-imageio-core-java to this
> > library. If ye
Le 22/12/2013 21:29, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> I wonder how large the effort might be to port libpixelmed-java which is
> (currently) the only Build-Depends of libjai-imageio-core-java to this
> library. If yes, it would make sense to package commons-imaging first.
The scope of commons-imaging d
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:27:04PM -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
>
> I would normally agree, but I believe that the upstream is dead (no
> updates in 7+ years) and it's not just a substitution API, but would be
> a reimplementation, but I'll leave the maintainer to decide the proper
> course of
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:25:54AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> On 07/10/2013 09:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi Niels,
> >
> > I perfectly agree that we should not try to keep OpenJDK-6 alive for
> > ages. However, jai-core is packaged as precondition for other packages
> > that are
On 07/10/2013 09:40 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> I perfectly agree that we should not try to keep OpenJDK-6 alive for
> ages. However, jai-core is packaged as precondition for other packages
> that are quite important (for Debian Med). The problem is that as you
> probably know all t
Hi Niels,
I perfectly agree that we should not try to keep OpenJDK-6 alive for
ages. However, jai-core is packaged as precondition for other packages
that are quite important (for Debian Med). The problem is that as you
probably know all these Java programs just include a jai-core.jar which
is u
6 matches
Mail list logo
