On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> If that means being able to install both versions side by side, and being
> able to redirect usage of ant using ANT_HOME (cdbs), then fine with me.
No, currently it is just a quick workaround for the dirty bug in gij.
That means you can eithe
Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
We should think about having 2 versions of ant in Debian.
I mean: having 2 upstream major versions of ant by default and not
just as a quick fix as we have it now. But the unversioned ant should
always point to the l
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> We should think about having 2 versions of ant in Debian.
I mean: having 2 upstream major versions of ant by default and not
just as a quick fix as we have it now. But the unversioned ant should
always point to the latest stable release. Wh
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Well, just after ant 1.8 has been uploaded, we've got at least 10 FTBFS
> bugs.
But only some of them can be attributed to ant. Maven-invoker-plugin
uses maven (not ant) for building! Some FTBFS are caused by asm3 and
groovy uploads.
> I'm
Hello again,
sorry to reply to myself, but I wanted to install ant1.7 and found out
that it can't be installed in parallel with ant (1.8); as we might end
up with a situation where certain packages will build correctly with Ant
1.7 and others with 1.8, I'm not sure this is viable.
Any idea (
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
I'm not a big Java specialist, just a packager, but we've seen quite a lot
of FTBFS bugs due to the upload of ant 1.8. I'm personally hit by one for
FreeMind, so I would support Matthias' suggestion until so
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> I'm not a big Java specialist, just a packager, but we've seen quite a lot
> of FTBFS bugs due to the upload of ant 1.8. I'm personally hit by one for
> FreeMind, so I would support Matthias' suggestion until someone explains
> what has actual
Hello,
Short version: +1
Matthias Klose wrote:
We are short before the freeze; the release architectures still include
architectures which require gij in it's current form (hppa,
kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64). Please either port OpenJDK to these
archs (hey, you're still an OpenJDK maintai
severity 571532 grave
thanks
On 27.02.2010 18:08, Torsten Werner wrote:
severity 571532 important
thanks
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
so why does 1.7 work, and not 1.8?
I have no idea why gij fails with bus error. I have uploaded a new
source package ant1.7 that c
severity 571532 important
thanks
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> so why does 1.7 work, and not 1.8?
I have no idea why gij fails with bus error. I have uploaded a new
source package ant1.7 that can be used by packages that are arch
dependent. Downgrading the severity be
Package: gij
Version: 4:4.4.2-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Hi,
gij fails with bus error when execution ant (1.8) and causes many FTBFS errors.
An example to reproduce the problem will be attached.
Cheers,
Torsten
build.xml
Description: XML document
@
11 matches
Mail list logo
