> So ... I'm CCing this to the debian-java list with a question: is it
> reasonable to name a package 'libsvn-java' if the jar file it ships is
> named svn-javahl.jar? I really don't like 'libsvn-javahl-java' as a
> name (reminds me of 'python-pyvorbis'), but if policy requires it,
> we'll use it.
2006/7/11, Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The other package which I know of (which I was searching for in Debian)
is JavaSVN. (snip)
See also http://bugs.debian.org/374256.
Seo Sanghyeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
> Yes, I wonder about that too. The jar file really is named svn-javahl,
> for historical reasons: there was once a second effort (now dead, I
> believe) to produce java bindings which were not "high-level".
>
> There is also an independent project out there, not affiliated with the
> Subversion
[Charles Fry]
> According to the current java policy, section 2.4:
>
>"Java libraries packages must be named libXXX[version]-java (without
>the brackets), where the version part is optional and should only
>contain the necessary part.
[...]
> In other words, if distributing the jar '
4 matches
Mail list logo
