-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 365408 + wontfix
thanks
Hi
Based the latest entries and the latest update to the policy, I am marking
this as wontfix. That being said, I intend to propose the removal of the
java*-compiler packages.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:12:51PM -0500, Tom Marble wrote:
> All:
>
> In reviewing the proposed changes to Debian Java Policy [1] [2]
> please allow me to make the following suggestions:
>
> 1. With respect to virtual packages [3] I understand that
>Debian Policy does not allow packages in "
All:
In reviewing the proposed changes to Debian Java Policy [1] [2]
please allow me to make the following suggestions:
1. With respect to virtual packages [3] I understand that
Debian Policy does not allow packages in "main" to
depend on packages in "non-free". Therefore a distinction
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:03:19PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
> > > Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
> > > I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
> >
> > A function that is used to
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:03:19PM -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
> > > Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
> > > I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
> >
> > A function that is used to
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MJ Ray a Âcrit :
> [...]
> > A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
> > Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
> > I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
>
> A function that is used to call a
> > A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
> > Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
> > I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
>
> A function that is used to call a runtime, compiler, etc of the Java(tm)
> language!
>
> Java? i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray a écrit :
[...]
> A virtual package name is a functional label, not a product name.
> Java is the name of an island and a natural language too.
> I'm surprised if Sun can prevent use of a word in this way.
A function that is used to call a run
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The major question is about replacing java1-runtime, java1-compiler,
> java2-runtime and java2-compiler virtual packages by classpath-jre,
> classpath-jdk for free java implementation and java-jre and java-jdk for
> non-free implementations. More informations on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cc'ing to debian-legal: summary:
The major question is about replacing java1-runtime, java1-compiler,
java2-runtime and java2-compiler virtual packages by classpath-jre,
classpath-jdk for free java implementation and java-jre and java-jdk for
non-free
> > 2) I don't see the trademark problem. There are already virtual
> > packages that use the word java. What would be the difference
> > between continuing the same trend?
>
> There is a trademark problem. The java1|2 virtual packages were targeted
> to Sun's, IBM's and Blackdown JVM ver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Fry a écrit :
[...]
> 2) I don't see the trademark problem. There are already virtual
> packages that use the word java. What would be the difference
> between continuing the same trend?
There is a trademark problem. The java1|2 vir
> > I strongly oppose the classpath/java distinction for classpath vs.
> > non-free JREs and JDKs. Instead I propose dropping classpath-* as well,
> > and only using java-jre and java-jdk.
>
> So people that wants to use Java should install non-free software?
> That's not possible in Debian!
No,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Fry wrote:
>>Note that I added a paragraph from a proposal from Stefan Gybas,
>>modified by Ben Burton (see Bug#227587). Even if they did not really get
>>a consensus, I think, with the change of the virtual packages to
>>classpath-jre, classpa
> Note that I added a paragraph from a proposal from Stefan Gybas,
> modified by Ben Burton (see Bug#227587). Even if they did not really get
> a consensus, I think, with the change of the virtual packages to
> classpath-jre, classpath-jdk, java-jre and java-jdk, the proposal of
> Stefan is good to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
> One of the result of our discussions in Oldenburg (devjam) and in
> Bruxelles (FOSDEM) is about the use of the virtual packages.
I forgot to thanks Wolfgang Baer, Michael Koch, Matthias Klose, Stefan
Gybas, Ben Burton and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
package: java-common
version: 0.24
Hi all,
One of the result of our discussions in Oldenburg (devjam) and in
Bruxelles (FOSDEM) is about the use of the virtual packages.
One of our reflexion was the number in the java*-runtime and
java*-compiler was
17 matches
Mail list logo
