Hi, All.
On Apr 15 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Azureus, the Java bit torrent client, ran using the most recent
> version of GIJ 4.1 from experimental. It does not, however, run with
> the version of GIJ 4.1 in testing/unstable.
Thanks for the confirmation of the symptoms.
> I haven't looked in
* Mladen Adamovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 10:16]:
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> useless. Shame on them.
Did you file bugs? I know we've improved in FC5 but I honestly don't t
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, the
package from Michael and I use it everyday now. It's really impressive
and I don't have problems no more. I got problems but when trying to
find out what it was, it was the latest WTP Eclipse plugin that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mladen Adamovic wrote:
[...]
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in
> Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so
> unstable that in fact it was completely useless.
I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, th
Mladen Adamovic writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> > > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> > > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> > > useless. Shame
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> useless. Shame on them.
Excuse me while I go behind the o
Mladen Adamovic writes:
> robin putters wrote:
> > How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental,
> > while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
> Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora c
robin putters wrote:
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental,
while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
(Native Eclipse) and it was so uns
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
[Robin Putters]
> How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to
> experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Does it only work with gij? What about the latest classpath release
and jamvm or cocoa? If it work with those, it can to into unstable
directly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
10 matches
Mail list logo
