Am 28.08.2015 um 22:16 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
[...]
>
> For the code to be compliant with DFSG does each one need a valid
> header, or is a statement from upstream sufficient? I also noticed a
> lot of image files used in Azureus and was not sure of their licence
> so I have as
id
header, or is a statement from upstream sufficient? I also noticed a
lot of image files used in Azureus and was not sure of their licence
so I have asked about those too.
>
> Hope that helps a little.
>
> Regards,
>
> Markus
>
Thanks for the assistance. I certainly need it!
Stephen
Am 18.08.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
[...]
> Thanks Markus.
>
> I have a sid desktop and I've been able to install and run the built
> package. I also started downloading a torrent to prove it's functional.
>
> My concern is over the copyright as there are a number of different
> copyri
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, 03:33 tony mancill wrote:
On 08/12/2015 04:35 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0,
Hi Stephen,
I haven't looked at the packaging yet, but I know that represents a lot
of work - awesome.
I wanted to mention one
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, 23:11 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 13/08/2015 01:35, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0,
Well done Stephen! Do you think it's possible to backport it to Jessie,
or does the packaging depend on too many new elements
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, 22:25 Markus Koschany wrote:
Am 13.08.2015 um 01:35 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0
>
I could successfully compile the package but I need a little bit more
time to dig into Azureus/Vuze. I'll get back t
On 08/12/2015 04:35 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, as well as:
>
> - Removed bundled bouncy castle library
> - Removed bundled commons library
> - Removed bundled json simple library
> - Build against swt4
> - Upd
Le 13/08/2015 01:35, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, as well as:
>
> - Removed bundled bouncy castle library
> - Removed bundled commons library
> - Removed bundled json simple library
> - Build against swt4
> - Upd
Am 13.08.2015 um 01:35 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, as well as:
>
> - Removed bundled bouncy castle library
> - Removed bundled commons library
> - Removed bundled json simple library
> - Build against swt4
> - Upd
I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, as well as:
- Removed bundled bouncy castle library
- Removed bundled commons library
- Removed bundled json simple library
- Build against swt4
- Updated the copyright file to correct licence on some files
If anyone has time, pleas
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:05 PM, tony mancill
> wrote:
>
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Great that someone has taken this on. I'll take a look this week.
>
> Cheers,
> tony
>
> Hi Tony,
I don't know if you had a chance to look at this package yet? I do still
need to make some changes to the copyrig
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:05 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> On 06/24/2014 05:08 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> > I've updated the Azureus/Vuze package [1] to incorporate the latest
> > upstream and remove a lot of bundled code already packaged in Debian.
> >
> > I would
On 06/24/2014 05:08 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I've updated the Azureus/Vuze package [1] to incorporate the latest
> upstream and remove a lot of bundled code already packaged in Debian.
>
> I would appreciate it if anyone has the time to look at the changes to
> see if
I've updated the Azureus/Vuze package [1] to incorporate the latest
upstream and remove a lot of bundled code already packaged in Debian.
I would appreciate it if anyone has the time to look at the changes to see
if they are suitable to request an upload of the package?
I have kept the ch
Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 02:19:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> > Adrian,
> >
> > Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in
> > this
> >
> > case with debian-java) :
> >...
>
> I am not doing mass bu
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in this
> case with debian-java) :
>...
I am not doing mass bug filing, I just sent bug reports for the two
packages where I personally ran int
Adrian,
Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in this
case with debian-java) : it's not only java-access-bridge and azureus but many
more packages. Debian Java Team is fully aware that recent changes in
openjdk-6 / openjdk-7 makes roughly 60+ packages
On 06/25/2011 05:51 AM, Andrew Ross wrote:
> Dear Debian Java Team members,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package azureus. I've
> updated the package to fix bugs #627567 and #561968 by disabling
> auto-updates by default.
>
> I have not updated
Dear Debian Java Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package azureus. I've
updated the package to fix bugs #627567 and #561968 by disabling
auto-updates by default.
I have not updated the standards version, or made any other changes,
since my primary interest in f
Le mercredi 02 décembre 2009 à 11:33 -0500, Adrian Perez a écrit :
> Please process this upload. Hopefully it will be the last one you'll
> need to sponsor for me.
Done
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
Please process this upload. Hopefully it will be the last one you'll
need to sponsor for me.
Best Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
It builds fine in a clean pbuilder, and the runtime dependencies seem
reasonable (and haven't changed), so I've sponsored the upload.
Cheers,
Tony
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Le vendredi 23 octobre 2009 21:10:48, Adrian Perez a écrit :
Please process this upload f
Hi Adrian,
Le vendredi 23 octobre 2009 21:10:48, Adrian Perez a écrit :
> Please process this upload for azureus version 4.2.0.8-3.
> The upload would fix these bugs: 551363
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/p
Please process this upload for azureus version 4.2.0.8-3.
The upload would fix these bugs: 551363
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/azureus/azureus_4.2.0.8-3.dsc
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Description: This
Hello team,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.2.0.8-2
of my package "azureus".
It builds these binary packages:
azureus- BitTorrent client
vuze - Multimedia BitTorrent client
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 502879
T
/main/a/azureus/azureus_4.2.0.8-1.dsc
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 23:16 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Wed Aug 12 11:44, Adrian Perez wrote:
> > Sure it did. Uploaded to mentors, and commited at:
> > svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/azureus.
>
> Uploaded
>
> Matt
>
Great. Waiting for user fee
On Wed Aug 12 11:44, Adrian Perez wrote:
> Sure it did. Uploaded to mentors, and commited at:
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/azureus.
Uploaded
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ild, but those actually help me with testing, funny, ah.?
> 6. debian/build.properties should be debian/ant.properties. But don't
> think this is major issue.
Agree. Isn't a major issue, could be renamed of course, for now I don't
see why.
> Hope this helps.
Sure it did.
On Wed Aug 12 15:08, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> > I've fixed all warnings, and now the package is entirely lintian clean
> > (even with --pedantic). IMHO it's ready for uploading.
(I should be able to look at this tonight)
> I have few comments about the package.
> 1. In the launcher script, use of S
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Adrian Perez wrote:
> Sorry about the pixmap size, gimp really played at me on this ;)
>
> I've fixed all warnings, and now the package is entirely lintian clean
> (even with --pedantic). IMHO it's ready for uploading.
I have few comments about the package.
1. In
n Perez wrote:
> > Dear friends,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor and reviewer for the new version 4.2.0.4-1
> > of my package "azureus".
>
> Hi, I've reviewed your upload and I get the following lintian output:
>
> W: azureus: old-fsf-address-in-c
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I believe /usr/bin/vuze is just a wrapper script. So unless the mail
> class of the application accepts some arguments, I don't think a
> manpage would make any sense.
Every file in /usr/bin should have at least a short manpage (policy
12.1) ex
Onkar Shinde writes:
> I believe /usr/bin/vuze is just a wrapper script. So unless the mail
> class of the application accepts some arguments, I don't think a
> manpage would make any sense.
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong.
Any program in one of the standard binary directories (/bin, /sbin,
Onkar Shinde wrote:
> > W: vuze: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/vuze
[..]
> I believe /usr/bin/vuze is just a wrapper script. So unless the mail
> class of the application accepts some arguments, I don't think a
> manpage would make any sense.
Independent from the policy requirements: As long as
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Fri Aug 07 12:15, Adrian Perez wrote:
>> Dear friends,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor and reviewer for the new version 4.2.0.4-1
>> of my package "azureus".
>
> Hi, I've reviewed your uplo
On Fri Aug 07 12:15, Adrian Perez wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor and reviewer for the new version 4.2.0.4-1
> of my package "azureus".
Hi, I've reviewed your upload and I get the following lintian output:
W: azureus: old-fsf-address-in-copyright
Dear friends,
I am looking for a sponsor and reviewer for the new version 4.2.0.4-1
of my package "azureus".
It builds these binary packages:
azureus- BitTorrent client
vuze - Multimedia BitTorrent client
The upload fixes RC bug #516059: azureus: FTBFS: Runs out of mem
I'll fix the remaining bugs manually when I confirm that they are
a) fixed upstream
b) merged
c) no longer relevant.
So, it's true that I might have skipped sending through mentors, but I
want as many eyes as possible.
Yes Shaun RFA'ed azureus a while ago, he was helping me wi
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Adrian Perez wrote:
> The upload would fix these bugs: 329018, 398014, 409952, 412213, 491624,
> 515015, 516059
What about:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509880
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506027
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Dear friends,
I am looking for a sponsor and reviewer for the new version 4.2.0.4-1
of my package "azureus".
It builds these binary packages:
azureus- BitTorrent client
vuze - Multimedia BitTorrent client
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix
Package: wnpp
Azureus is a BitTorrent client. The upstream package has been renamed
to Vuze and now has a focus on distributing and playing multimedia
content.
Azureus is implemented in Java and uses SWT, the cross-platform widget
toolkit for Java used primarily by the Eclipse IDE.
Eclipse
On Nov 22, 2007 3:57 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice to find out what the problem really is, but I can't
> think of a way to find out. At least, a way that doesn't involve
> punching a hole in my firewall and allowing God Only Knows what
> peer-to-peer traffic throug
e that the problem lies in our NIO implementation. I don't know
> exactly what the problem is. It has been discussed a few times on some
> of our mailing lists (GNU Classpath, [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> FWIW, there have been many bug reports against azureus in Fedora abou
gt;
> I believe that the problem lies in our NIO implementation. I don't know
> exactly what the problem is. It has been discussed a few times on some
> of our mailing lists (GNU Classpath, [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> FWIW, there have been many bug reports against azureus in Fedor
lem is. It has been discussed a few times on some
of our mailing lists (GNU Classpath, [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
FWIW, there have been many bug reports against azureus in Fedora about
this. Now that we have IcedTea I've closed all of these bug reports
just asking people to not use gcj. IcedT
TECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Shaun Jackman writes:
> > > > > > Running the bit torrent client Azureus, downloading progresses
> > > > > > terribly slowly with the
> > > > > > java-gcj-compa
On Nov 21, 2007 11:30 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shaun Jackman writes:
> > On Nov 21, 2007 6:31 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Shaun Jackman writes:
> > > > Running the bit torrent client Azureu
Shaun Jackman writes:
> On Nov 21, 2007 11:30 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Shaun Jackman writes:
> > > On Nov 21, 2007 6:31 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Shaun Jackman writes:
> >
Shaun Jackman writes:
> On Nov 21, 2007 6:31 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Shaun Jackman writes:
> > > Running the bit torrent client Azureus, downloading progresses
> > > terribly slowly with the
> > > java-gcj-compat
On Nov 21, 2007 6:31 AM, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Shaun Jackman writes:
> > Running the bit torrent client Azureus, downloading progresses
> > terribly slowly with the
> > java-gcj-compat JVM and works fine with Sun's JVM. If anyone has any
Shaun Jackman writes:
> Running the bit torrent client Azureus, downloading progresses
> terribly slowly with the
> java-gcj-compat JVM and works fine with Sun's JVM. If anyone has any
> thoughts on why this might be the case, or has some time to
> investigate, I'
Running the bit torrent client Azureus, downloading progresses
terribly slowly with the
java-gcj-compat JVM and works fine with Sun's JVM. If anyone has any
thoughts on why this might be the case, or has some time to
investigate, I'd appreciate the help in solving this bug.
http://bugs.
> Cannot find Java function at 0xb7c94f5e
> java: codegen-common.c:547: codegen_findmethod: Assertion `0' failed.
> Aborted
>
> Have you seen these troubles?
This error message means, that we had a segmentation fault, catched by
the SIGSEGV handler, now trying to build up the stacktrace, but can'
I don't think the GIJ jvm can run with the classpath package, I think
we'll have to wait for GCC 4.2 for a more recent classpath. If you're
worried about performance, I remember Azureus on windows (Sun 1.5 JDK)
to be absolutely terrible for system performance, but it runs really
s
Shaun,
Thanks for replying. I hope you had a nice holiday.
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 13:35 -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> I may have spoken too soon. Although the GUI runs, Azureus doesn't to
> transfer any data when run with cacao 0.96-1 and classpath 2:0.91-3.
> In addition, whe
On 6/25/06, Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just tested Azureus with cacao 0.96-1 and classpath 2:0.91-3, and it
works! Wonderful news. Thanks for pointing this out. I would guess
that it's not so much cacao that makes it work, but the fact that
cacao uses classpath, where
Hello Robin,
Sorry, for my delay in replying. I was on vacation in Montréal.
Yes, org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Tab seems to be causing a
`java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Argument cannot be null'. This
error might be the reason Azureus won't start with java-gcj-compat
1.0.56-2, b
Hi, All.
On Apr 15 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Azureus, the Java bit torrent client, ran using the most recent
> version of GIJ 4.1 from experimental. It does not, however, run with
> the version of GIJ 4.1 in testing/unstable.
Thanks for the confirmation of the symptoms.
> I ha
On 4/9/06, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> does this work with libswt3.1-gtk-java (at least on amd64)? For alpha
> we should build that from the eclipse source without building eclipse
> itself.
I'd like to know if it does. However, the buildd page says that
eclipse is failing to b
Shaun Jackman writes:
> It has been reported that swt-gtk -- and azureus, which depends on it
> -- does not work on amd64. I suspect this is true of all 64-bit
> architectures. If you have access to a 64-bit architecture besides
> amd64, I would very much appreciate your help with t
* Mladen Adamovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 10:16]:
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> useless. Shame on them.
Did you file bugs? I know we've improved in FC5 but I honestly don't t
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, the
package from Michael and I use it everyday now. It's really impressive
and I don't have problems no more. I got problems but when trying to
find out what it was, it was the latest WTP Eclipse plugin that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mladen Adamovic wrote:
[...]
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in
> Fedora core 4 (Native Eclipse) and it was so
> unstable that in fact it was completely useless.
I don't know Fedora but I use Eclipse 3.1.2 built native with gcj, th
Mladen Adamovic writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> > > Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> > > (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it w
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
> (Native Eclipse) and it was so unstable that in fact it was completely
> useless. Shame on them.
Excuse me while I g
Mladen Adamovic writes:
> robin putters wrote:
> > How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental,
> > while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
> Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
> Guys from Red Hat included
robin putters wrote:
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental,
while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Did you test Azureus properly, and not just be able to compile it?
Guys from Red Hat included GCJ compiled Eclipse in Fedora core 4
(Native Eclipse) and
How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
[Robin Putters]
> How about uploading an Azureus 'pure' debian package to
> experimental, while GCJ4.1 is not in unstable yet?
Does it only work with gij? What about the latest classpath release
and jamvm or cocoa? If it work with those, it can to into unstable
directly.
--
ib in your sources list !
>>
>>OOPS! I didn't have contrib in the list. Since it runs with gcj, I
>>think we should move it to main now.
>
> Well, you can file a wishlist bug against azureus. But its
> the decision of the maintainer.
>
>>PS: hmm that's wh
ntrib in the list. Since it runs with gcj, I
> think we should move it to main now.
Well, you can file a wishlist bug against azureus. But its
the decision of the maintainer.
> Cheers
> Praveen
> PS: hmm that's why I couldn't install charva :-)
Charva is moved to main now - howev
Hi Praveen,
प्रवीण् ए (Praveen A) wrote:
>
> But I'm not able to see it in my apt-cache
>
> icon113:~# apt-get update
[...]
> icon113:~# apt-cache search azureus
> icon113:~# apt-cache show azureus | grep Maintainer
> icon113:~#
>
Looks like you miss unstable
2006/1/25, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Its already in the archive.(sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show azureus | grep MaintainerMaintainer: Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But I'm not able to see it in my apt-cacheicon113:~# apt-get update[... 14 CDs skipped :-)]I
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:27:21AM +0530, ? ??? (Praveen
A) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if anyone is packaging azureus. It works with
> gij 4.0and gij
> 4.1. I think I'll have to try Jonas at a later stage. Right now Jonas builds
> fin
Hi, I would like to know if anyone is packaging azureus. It works with gij 4.0 and gij 4.1. I think I'll have to try Jonas at a later stage. Right now Jonas builds fine with some tweaking of build.xml. I'd like to package azureus if no one yet started on it.
CheersPravee
r packaging) and add to your bug report
all the informations you already included in this mail.
Thanks
Linus van Geuns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I don't know if this is the right NG to ask my question, plz tell if I
> should use another...
>
> I want t
Hi all,
I don't know if this is the right NG to ask my question, plz tell if I
should use another...
I want to know, where I can read if a package ([1]azureus) is to be
included into the debian distri?
Azureus is a comfortable [2]Bittorrent-client written in Java and is
already distribut
Hi,
I packaged the azureus package for debian. The irc stuff is now
removed due to legal iusses. The package is apt-get able at and
linda/lintian clean. The package section is contrib because it depends
on java2 runtime.
ITP Bug Number is 215127.
deb http://www.plaisthos.de/deb/ ./
deb-src
79 matches
Mail list logo
