Matthew Johnson wrote:
> who is still active here and interested in the Java packaging policy?
I am, currently working on jetty 6, maven 2.1.0 and adding Maven
metadata to lots of existing packages + other cleanup (lintian...)
Ludovic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debi
* Matthew Johnson [2009-06-16 09:53]:
> I've also been contacted by someone from Eclipse, to whom I offered any
> help they needed in getting it to work, but I've not heard anything
> back.
That was me and I've just been too busy to get back to you. Sorry.
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue Jun 16 09:29, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 09:18]:
> > Are the d-bus java bindings packaged / licensed in an eclipse-friendly
> > way these days?
>
> I've been meaning to investigate this but it keeps falling off the top
> of my to-do list. It would be grea
* Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 09:18]:
> Are the d-bus java bindings packaged / licensed in an eclipse-friendly
> way these days?
I've been meaning to investigate this but it keeps falling off the top
of my to-do list. It would be great if someone with the time could do
this investigation.
> We've kicked around the idea of p2 talking to PackageKit via D-Bus.
> This would be less intrusive than re-working how profile synchronization
> works and wouldn't be that hard. I think Alex may have a working
> prototype.
That would work too :) The ability for eclipse to talk d-bus would be v
* Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 08:54]:
> >> 3) Figure out a filesystem layout for plug-ins. An idea could be to do
> >> as Fedora does and use e.g., /usr/share/eclipse/ (thus
> >> staying out of P2's way) or figure out how to integrate apt with P2
> >> (this will need development of a debian/
>> 3) Figure out a filesystem layout for plug-ins. An idea could be to do
>> as Fedora does and use e.g., /usr/share/eclipse/ (thus
>> staying out of P2's way) or figure out how to integrate apt with P2
>> (this will need development of a debian/apt specific "touchpoint" in
>> P2-speak, at least as
Hi,
* Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 08:32]:
> 2) Integrate the eclipse-build system from upstream Eclipse Linux
> Tools Project once it is released. Perhaps help so that it can be
> released sooner.
Yes, we would love some help :) .
> 3) Figure out a filesystem layout for plug-ins. An idea
> I'd love to know who this "ubuntu guy" is so we can coordinate efforts
> :)
I have already told you (and to Alexander Kurtakov) :)
He is Nathan Summers (aka rockwalrus).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Hi,
* Pantelis Koukousoulas [2009-06-16 07:04]:
> The Eclipse Linux Tools project (lead by the RedHat/Fedora people) is
> focusing on the build system problem. There is at least one ubuntu guy
> focusing on the build problem too, with a slightly different approach.
I'd love to know who this "ubu
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jens
Kapitza wrote:
>
>> I can help to package some of the deps if needed.
>
> I can offer my time if some can tell me how i can help.
> Which bugs should be fixed first?
> Is there some kind of roadmap?
>
Well a "rough" roadmap would go like this:
1) Package depen
I can help to package some of the deps if needed.
I can offer my time if some can tell me how i can help.
Which bugs should be fixed first?
Is there some kind of roadmap?
Jens Kapitza
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Le mardi 16 juin 2009 à 12:07 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> On Tue Jun 16 14:04, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
>
> > If some debianers help by dealing with dependencies, the job becomes
> > much easier.
>
> Can someone post a list of needed deps and URLs to tarballs?
>
> I'll see what I can
>> Can someone post a list of needed deps and URLs to tarballs?
>
> And then maybe someone can find/file RFPs for those, and add them as
> blocking bugs of #432350.
>
> (Here is a nice short task for casual contributors BTW.)
Fedora has a nice list of eclipse dependencies.
There are also bugs in l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Jun 16 14:04, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
>
>> If some debianers help by dealing with dependencies, the job becomes
>> much easier.
>
> Can someone post a list of needed deps and URLs to tarballs?
And then maybe som
On Tue Jun 16 14:04, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
> If some debianers help by dealing with dependencies, the job becomes
> much easier.
Can someone post a list of needed deps and URLs to tarballs?
I'll see what I can do
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> About Eclipse, someone (a DD probably) should become the leader and
> dispatch the tasks...
Leader or no leader, the best thing to do right now is to help packaging
the dependencies of Eclipse. Unlike eclipse itself, its dependencies are
typically not complexity monsters or anything and it would
Hello !
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and
> improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf
> session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the
> Java packag
Le lundi 15 juin 2009 à 17:38 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and
> improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf
> session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the
> Ja
Le 15-juin-09 à 18:38, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
Hi all,
Hi Matthew,
Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try
and
improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf
session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the
Java pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Markus and James,
the Java team is certainly in need of more manpower so any help is
appreciated. There are a lot of tasks, just check the BTS [1] and pick one
:) However regarding Eclipse packaging, I don't think there are any small
tasks that
Similar situation here... no DD, not at Debconf, but *very* interested in
including and packaging Eclipse and Eclipse related components in Debian.
Regards, Markus
2009/6/16 James Tait
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> > I'll not attend Debconf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> I'll not attend Debconf but I'm interrested in any effort bringing
> Java Policy in a refreshed state. Is there a repo. somewhere to
> check current state (beside java-common pakage bugs [1]) ?
>
I'm not a DD, will not be
Le lundi 15 juin 2009 18:38:17, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
> Hi all,
Hi Matthew,
> Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and
> improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf
> session to discuss it,
I'll not attend Debconf but I'm interrested
Marcus Better wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Johnson wrote:
who is still active here and interested in the Java packaging policy?
count me in.
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> who is still active here and interested in the Java packaging policy?
I am... And BTW if anyone feels they have stopped being active, please drop
a line so we can keep an eye on your packages.
Cheers,
Marcus
-BEGIN PGP
Hi all,
Relating to both the Eclipse stuff and the fact that I'd like to try and
improve the Java packaging policy in Debian and have booked a debconf
session to discuss it, who is still active here and interested in the
Java packaging policy? (DD or otherwise)
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signatu
27 matches
Mail list logo
