Re: Bug#210716: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Tom Tromey writes: > > "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ben> It seems then that this bug belongs to the gcj-3.3 package, which was > Ben> generating the incorrect bytecode. I'm reassigning this accordingly. > > Any chance you could try gcj cvs? If this bug remains I'd lik

Re: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-05 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> It seems then that this bug belongs to the gcj-3.3 package, which was Ben> generating the incorrect bytecode. I'm reassigning this accordingly. Any chance you could try gcj cvs? If this bug remains I'd like to get a bugzilla entry for i

Re: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-04 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Many thanks Ben! Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > reassign 210716 gcj-3.3 > thanks > >> So basically, jython has been compiled by a buggy compiler ;) > > Confirmed: I've just uploaded a new jython package that builds using > jikes-gij instead of gcj, and the problem goes away. Of course

Re: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-04 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So basically, jython has been compiled by a buggy compiler ;) The JVM > Spec 2nd Edition says in $4.7.3 'The Code Attribute' : [snip] [...] > WARNING Bad bytecode! Illegal exception table: start_pc=sth not lower > than end_pc=sth in method something_el

Re: Bug#210716: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Ben Burton wrote: reassign 210716 gcj-3.3 thanks So basically, jython has been compiled by a buggy compiler ;) Confirmed: I've just uploaded a new jython package that builds using jikes-gij instead of gcj, and the problem goes away. Of course jython still crashes with kaffe, but that's just the

Re: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-02 Thread Ben Burton
reassign 210716 gcj-3.3 thanks > So basically, jython has been compiled by a buggy compiler ;) Confirmed: I've just uploaded a new jython package that builds using jikes-gij instead of gcj, and the problem goes away. Of course jython still crashes with kaffe, but that's just the old "specifying

Re: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Dalibor Topic wrote: I'll check it into kaffe's CVS as the current assert is not very user friendly. I'll change the warning message, though, to Done, checked in into kaffe's CVS. cheers, dalibor topic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Re: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-02 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Mark, hi all, Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 03:12, Ben Burton wrote: #210716 jython causes kaffe to fail with assert error , | Version: 1:1.1.1-1 | | > After removing the JNI lines from jython shell script (see | > issue #207998) kaffe