Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-28 Thread Wookey
inaries is very useful > >too to satisfy the self-dependency without more faff. > > Yes, that was their purpose. And it worked beatifully. Thanks. armhf and armel uploaded and accepted half an hour ago (armel built by Andrey Rakhmatullin) I'll try doing openjdk-20 next. Woo

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-27 Thread Wookey
On 2024-03-27 15:27 +, Wookey wrote: > On 2024-03-26 22:28 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > > I hacked that, and I tried to do armel and armhf as well but > > dak stopped me, whereas mini-dak was not as strict. > > What was the actual problem with uploading the imag

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-27 Thread Wookey
d be enough, should it not? or am I missing something? Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Wookey
rough 18,19,20,21 building each version > with the previous one. I presume the same, but don't actually know how old a java you can use to bootstrap each newer java. Is it always just one version? Wookey -- Principal hats: Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: deduplicating jquery/

2020-11-30 Thread Wookey
case can someone reply so they are in the bug report. Cheers. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Building maven packages

2016-12-29 Thread Wookey
On 2016-12-30 02:07 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 30/12/2016 à 01:59, Wookey a écrit : > > > which looks like what's wanted. > > Not exactly, the project wants bcel:bcel:5.x and we provide > org.apache.bcel:bcel:5.x, the groupId is different. Right

Re: Building maven packages

2016-12-29 Thread Wookey
On 2016-12-30 00:31 +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 29/12/2016 à 02:29, Wookey a écrit : > > > I also got the complaint that it can't find: > > backport-util-concurrent > > > > Do I care about that? Do I need to package that too? > > You don'

Re: Building maven packages

2016-12-29 Thread Wookey
On 2016-12-30 00:11 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > On 29.12.2016 02:29, Wookey wrote: > Don't try to hard to make mh_make happy because it can only give you a > rudimentary skeleton debian directory. (For "easy" packages it works > much better but more complicated proj

re: mh_resolve_dependencies

2016-12-29 Thread Wookey
gt; one we were just trying to compile.) OK, this looks to be the same thing that I am seeing with maven-native and its self-dependencies (the 'building maven packages' thread) https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2016/12/msg00074.html Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware

re: Building maven packages

2016-12-29 Thread Wookey
OK. I tried some more on this so have an update below. > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:21, Markus Koschany wrote: > > On 02.11.2016 05:52, Wookey wrote: > > > Having hacked about a bit it currenty fails with: > > > The POM for org.codehaus.mojo:native-maven-plugin:jar:1.

re: Building maven packages

2016-12-28 Thread Wookey
[I'm not on debian-java so keep me cc:ed please - I only found your reply via the list archive] I was hoping for some clue about this bcel versioning issue. Anyone able to shed some light? > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:21, Markus Koschany wrote: > > On 02.11.2016 05:52, Wookey wrote:

re: Building maven packages

2016-12-02 Thread Wookey
[I'm not on debian-java so keep me cc:ed please - I only found your reply via the list archive] > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:21, Markus Koschany wrote: > > On 02.11.2016 05:52, Wookey wrote: > > > Having hacked about a bit it currenty fails with: > > > The POM fo

Building maven packages

2016-11-02 Thread Wookey
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:21, Markus Koschany wrote: [I'm not on debian-java so keep me cc:ed please - I only found your reply via the list archive] But thanks for the quick and helpful response. > On 02.11.2016 05:52, Wookey wrote: > > Thre is also a load of stuff about osgi in

Building maven packages

2016-11-01 Thread Wookey
default-java/lib/tools.jar -Dclassworlds.conf=/etc/maven/m2-debian.conf -Dmaven.home=/usr/share/maven -Dmaven.multiModuleProjectDirectory=/home/wookey/packages/jscience/javolution/javolution-6.0.0 org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher -s/etc/maven/settings-debian.xml -Dmaven.repo.local=/

Re: Creating a deb for a Java based project, and saying hi to the mailing list

2016-10-04 Thread Wookey
ing, but know remarkably little about java). I've used java-helper and the debian policy and wiki info: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/ https://wiki.debian.org/DebianJavaPackaging Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ signa

Re: Java problem when upgrading pixelmed

2015-10-09 Thread Wookey
+++ Andreas Tille [2015-10-08 17:22 +0200]: > Uhmmm, it would be a shame if we would loose JOSM. :-( A shame? - It would be a disaster! (Unless there is a replacement with that offline functionality that I don't know about?) Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware,

Re: Porting OpenJDK 8

2014-04-18 Thread Wookey
p://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/openjdk-8.git/info/refs not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server? Is that a problem at your end or mine? Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Javahelper automatic depends

2013-10-07 Thread Wookey
depends line should be: default-jdk-headless | java-runtime6 | java-runtime7, java-wrapper, ${misc:Depends} Advice welcome. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Re: debian-arm bug squashing party continues

2006-10-20 Thread Wookey
tus/issues summary: http://wiki.debian.org/ArmBuilddWatch USeful for info on current versions and bugs: http://packages.qa.debian.org/ Current uninstalable issues: http://ftp-master.debian.org/~aba/test-issues/current Why is package X not in testing: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/ Wookey -- Ale

Re: Fw: debian-arm bug squashing party 13.10-15.10.2006

2006-10-14 Thread Wookey
On 2006-10-11 22:52 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Wookey writes: > > As mentioned below - the debian arm java situation is currently not > > good. We would very much welcome any java types who could help us fix > > and/or understand the problems in various java packages. Do p

Fw: debian-arm bug squashing party 13.10-15.10.2006

2006-10-11 Thread Wookey
ort.cgi?bug=390966 ----- End forwarded message - Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]