Re: debian/watch: uupdate or orig-tar.sh?

Hi Emmanuel, Am 27.03.13 10:34, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: I'm reviewing the watch files for the Apache Commons packages and I noticed two styles, one using uupdate and the other calling the debian/orig-tar.sh script. ... What is the recommended practice? I recommend orig-tar.sh because I've in

Re: Guidelines for source control management

Hi, thanks for all your feedback! I've updated the Wiki pages. Merry X-mas! Torsten On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2011, 15:43 +0200 schrieb Torsten Werner: >> Hi, >> >> I've touched many packages in the past

Re: Apache Solr

Hi, I can help with uploading the package. Just contact me. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/calj2o_0z_zypqhbperx6gcn02m4yzohkpcs35oxz

Re: pkg-java mini-dinstall broken

Hi Vincent, On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >  archivedir = /home/groups/pkg-java/htdocs > >  (seems like we *are* in the chroot ;-)...). > >  BTW, I think this file should be group-writable, so that we don't have to > bother you next time, shouldn't it ? I've fixed both

Re: Bug#643498: cobertura-maven-plugin: FTBFS: Error building POM

Hi Miguel, On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I have been solving bugs like this by adding a Build-Depends on > libmaven-plugin-tools-java but I wonder if I'm solving just a symptom > and not the real bug that could be somewhere else. > > Does anybody have an idea why sever

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > hmm, on second thought, I think this looks wrong. at build time you always > have > the output of dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH available, so you can > adjust it.  At runtime that should be handled by all our different java > wrap

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

Hi, openjdk-6-jre-headless now doesn't use java-6-openjdk anymore. so with the appropriate conflicts, this symlink can be moved to default-jre-headless. I do not think that this is a good solution. IMHO openjdk-6 should build a package with the generic symlink. As an alternative: would

Guidelines for source control management

Hi, I've touched many packages in the past weeks and found several package that I could not change easily or could not change at all. That is not the idea behind Debian - to make changes hard. That is why I have started writing down some guidelines at 3 wiki pages: - http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Ja

Re: visad-2.0/.pc/fixopendap.patch/visad/data/dods/Adapter.java:25: package dods.dap does not exist

Hi, On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/visad/trunk/build.xml?view=markup srcdir="." Either you can set it some subdirectory or you should work with includes/excludes. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: saxon 9

Hi Sylvestre, do you know saxonb? It is available even in oldstable. But it is not uptodate and the current maintainers are not really active. Cheers, Torsten On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > > Before I am starting to work on this, does any one started to work

Re: RFS: animal-sniffer

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Matthias Schmitz wrote: > If the package is good enough now i would be pleased if you upload > it :-). Uploaded and tagged after removing the obsoleted file doc-base.index.html. Thanks for taking care of the package, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: RFS: animal-sniffer

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Matthias Schmitz wrote: > The javadocs for every sub module are generated in > /target/apidocs/ and every javadoc has its own index.html. That is not true if you set DEB_MAVEN_DOC_TARGET := javadoc:jar javadoc:aggregate in debian/rules which is done by mh_make b

Re: RFS: animal-sniffer

Hi, On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:41 AM, Matthias Schmitz wrote: > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > >  http://mentors.debian.net/package/animal-sniffer > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this > command: > >  dget -x >

Re: RFS: animal-sniffer

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: > I am pretty sure that you can replace your multiline file > debian/libanimal-sniffer-java-doc.install by one line >  target/site/apidocs/* > usr/share/doc/libanimal-sniffer-java/libanimal-sniffer/api target/site/apidocs/* u

Re: Maven 3

Hi Damien, On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > - packages some missing "parent" poms (into multi or single source tarball) I can start working on that next week. I would prefer a single source and binary package ('maven-parent-poms') for all pom files. We can split it l

Bug#641757: ITP: maven-project-info-reports-plugin -- Maven Project Info Reports Plugin

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner * Package name: maven-project-info-reports-plugin Version : 2.4 Upstream Author : Johnny R. Ruiz III * URL : http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-project-info-reports-plugin/ * License : Apache-2.0

Re: package sun.awt.image.codec does not exist

Hi Mathieu, it looks like warnings, not errors. Cheers, Torsten On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi all, > >  Does anyone knows why I am getting the following error (*) ? Is > there some actual difference in between sun java and openjdk one ? > They are not interchan

Re: OSGi+Bundle+Ant+Task

Hi, On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > However I did not understand what you meant ? I pushed some initial > work at svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/net-luminis-build-plugin and > did use a B-D on bnd. > Are you saying I am missing stuff in my current debian package ?

Re: OSGi+Bundle+Ant+Task

Hi Mathieu, On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >  Unless someone has started doing it already I would like to package > the following for debian: > > https://opensource.luminis.net/wiki/display/SITE/OSGi+Bundle+Ant+Task > > I'll put it under the debian-java umbrella organisa

Re: GWT2 packaging

Hi Alexandre, sorry I am in a hurry and have no time for a full answer. Am 06.09.2011 09:08, schrieb Alexandre Rossi: > - liborgjson-java (json library from http://json.org/java ) please be careful: this is considered non-free code because of the 'evil clause'. There is some older version which

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to the > end? JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe that we will see some FTBFS problems. But maybe that it might a good reason the switch to

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

Hi Matthias, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > The path /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk isn't valid anymore.  It currently only > contains common jar files. which path should we use now if we want to use openjdk-6 explicitely? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Re: orphaning git-maintained packages

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Not doing anything? Or, instead make an mr-list of repositories for > non-orpahned packages. > > IIUC, it is (almost) mandatory to do for SVN maintained packages, because > you may not want to checkout those repositories. But, that doesn't sta

orphaning git-maintained packages

Hi, I've asked myself what should happen to a git repo after orphaning a package? It is easy with subversion: we just move the directory from trunk/ into ../old/. I want to suggest to move a git repo to the /home/groups/pkg-java/OLDGIT/ directory on git.debian.org. I've done that with javatar.git.

Re: java-access-bridge official packaging source ?

Hi Damien, we should try to merge doko's changes back into our SVN repo. Do you need help? Cheers, Torsten On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to fix java-access-bridge to build with openjdk-7 but I can find > the > "official" debian packaging

Maven 3

Hi Ludovic, Damien & others, I've looked at . Is that page more or less up to date? What would be a good task to start with if someone want to contribute to packaging Maven 3? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Bug#639715: ITP: libjsoup-java -- Java HTML parser that makes sense of real-world HTML soup

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Torsten Werner * Package name: libjsoup-java Version : 1.6.1 Upstream Author : Jonathan Hedley * URL : http://jsoup.org/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: Java Description : Java HTML parser that makes sense of

Re: package Apache James for Debian

Hi, Am 26.08.2011 14:51, schrieb D Dave: > mh_make > --from-svn=http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/jsieve/tags/jsieve-project-0.4/ > -v did you use the newest version of maven-debian-helper (1.4.4)? It fails for me with the same message as in bug #639316. You should be able to work around it

Re: Future of sun-java6 package ?

Hi Sylvestru, On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Dalibor Topic just replied through his blog to one of my question about > the update 27 of sun-java6 being available under the dlj license: > http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html thanks for the pointer. > rm of sun-ja

Maven-debian-helper should handle Maven plugin updates automatically

Hi! I'd like to get your input on an idea which I have written down at . I have prepared the detailed ideas only for the very first step. What do you think about that? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: You must specify a valid ANT_HOME directory!

Hi Mathieu, Am 19.08.2011 16:12, schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > You must specify a valid ANT_HOME directory! I cannot reproduce this error in a sid chroot. But I get a null pointer exception when building version 1.0-4. I could fix that by removing qdox from Build-Depends and DEB_JARS. Torsten -

Re: dynamic Text in package descriptions

Hi, On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Michael Bramer wrote: > ! Description: Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime > !  This package points to the Java runtime, or Java compatible > !  runtime recommended for the ${jre:arch} architecture, > !  which is ${jre} for ${jre:arch}. the interesting p

Re: Quitting Java packaging

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > Done for lucene2, commons-csv, easymock, lucene3 (including the 3.0->3.2 > branch) and solr (in git). Thanks! Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Re: DebConf11: Java Team Meeting and Eclipse Packaging BoF

Hi Tony, On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:11 PM, tony mancill wrote: > Thanks for compiling the list.  I'm touched several packages on that > list, and so am willing to take on the rebuilds.  I think we've > determined that we need to wait on an updated version of > maven-debian-helper before beginning,

Re: Quitting Java packaging

Hi Jan-Pascal, thank you for your work in the past! Should we remove you from the Alioth project? Do you plan to remove your name from the Uploaders fields and commit such changes to the VCS repos with an unreleased changelog entry? Cheers, Torsten On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jan-Pascal van

Re: about orphaning old packages

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I like the idea of getting rid of unused stuff/crap/etc., but I think > orphaning them should be the first step towards getting them removed. >  I suspect most of the packages will not be adopted by anyone. Sure we should get them removed aft

about orphaning old packages

Hi, I want to suggest that we start orphaning older packages with no reverse dependencies and low popcon values. I think about packages like pentaho-reporting-flow-engine and I have generated a list of all team maintained packages at . The times

Re: unsupporting Architecture: mips

Hi, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > we have discussed the problems with mips in New York at DebConf10 last > year. I believe it is time to stop supporting Java on this architecture > because nobody really takes care of it. That is why I want to suggest > t

Re: DebConf11: Java Team Meeting and Eclipse Packaging BoF

Hi, On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Alexander Holupirek wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Ludovic Claude >> wrote: >>> maven-repo-helper installing jars under /usr/share/maven-repo by default >>> is an old issue, it should be fixed by recompiling your package against >>> a newer versi

Re: [pkg-jboss-maintainer] JBoss 5 in Debian

Hi Victor, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Victor Seva wrote: > is this effort still alive? not really. > is there anybody interested in get jboss packaged in Debian? Yes, it is far from trivial. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: Idea for wheezy development: automatic class search tool

[jar content] On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >  Is the source available somewhere ? I'm interested. Sorry for the delay. It is quite close: Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.deb

Re: DebConf11: Java Team Meeting and Eclipse Packaging BoF

Hi, On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > maven-repo-helper installing jars under /usr/share/maven-repo by default > is an old issue, it should be fixed by recompiling your package against > a newer version of maven-repo-helper (>= 0.7). I've generated a list of binary packag

Re: unsupporting Architecture: mips

Hi, Am 28.07.2011 15:58, schrieb Rene Engelhard: > if openjdk then works (for LibreOffice) on ia64, yes, I could live with that. it does not work on ia64? > But, umm, shouldn't you have sent this mail to -mips, too? :-) Let me quote myself: "needs to be discussed with the release team and the m

unsupporting Architecture: mips

Hi, we have discussed the problems with mips in New York at DebConf10 last year. I believe it is time to stop supporting Java on this architecture because nobody really takes care of it. That is why I want to suggest the following radical approach, which needs to be discussed with the release team

Re: missing-classpath lintian warnings and Maven based packages.

Hi James, On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, James Page wrote: > If you happen to be packaging Maven based projects and want to make sure > that the Class-Path entries in JAR files are set correctly you can use > javahelper in conjunction with maven-debian-helper (see [0]). > > It would be nice to

Re: Unable to skip the test phase with maven-debian-helper 1.1

Hi Miguel, On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: > Now the question is how to pass this variable to the package build > process? just add a file debian/maven.properties with the contents maven.test.skip=true if you are using cdbs. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: How to build Clojure package

Hi Daigo, On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Daigo Moriwaki wrote: > I am still unsuccessful. > Let me post again. > > > I am looking into how to build the clojure package in Debian. > I cloned clojure and silt from the Debian repository, then I am wondering > how to generate patches. I do not know

Re: OpenOffice SDK

Hi Sebastian, On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Sebastian Humenda wrote: > When I'm now trying to build my program, it cannot find the class > com.sun.star.registry.XRegistryKey and hence I've tried to find the correct > path > to add it to the class path. In /usr/share/idl/openoffice/ the direct

Re: Next Maven problem (Was: Medical device support for GNUmed)

Hi Andreas, On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:33:43AM +0200, Ludovic Claude wrote: >> org.hsqldb:hsqldb:2.0.0 >> org.reflections:reflections:0.9.5-RC2 > > I came to the same conclusion that those two are missing.  However, > >> org.rxtx:rxtx:2.2pre

Re: Help with maven based package needed (dcm4che)

Hi Andreas, On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Did you noticed that I'd call myself a beginner in maven and Java > issues? :-)  If I can avoid taking even more packages I'd stay > avway from such tasks. that means it is a perfect time to learn something and become an expert

Re: Help with maven based package needed (dcm4che)

Hi Andreas, your package needs the maven-bundle-plugin which in not packaged yet. Am 19.04.2011 18:12, schrieb Andreas Tille: > But what will be the solution for this problem? You could try to package maven-bundle-plugin or patch out the maven-jar-plugin configuration from the top leven pom.xml.

Re: sun-java6 updates for {old,}stable?

Hi, On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Are there any plans to update the sun-java6 packages in lenny and > squeeze for the recent floating point DoS issue? yes: and

Re: Idea for wheezy development: automatic class search tool

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >  That still doesn't provide dependency analysis. Sure, it is just raw data. >  How do you keep it up-to-date ? It is a daily cron job. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Idea for wheezy development: automatic class search tool

Hi Vincent, On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >  This is an idea that has been there for a long time, but I haven't > had the time yet to implement it, nor even to voice it so far. What > I'm often missing while packaging Java software is a simple too to > find which debian

Re: How to apply maven build system

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Yeah, that's typical for Maven.  It's absolutely amazing how much stuff it > downloads in order to do anything. It is impressive to run something trivial like 'mvn clean' (after purging the ~/.m2 cache) in a mostly empty directory except for

Re: How to apply maven build system (Was: How to use Debian packaged freehep instead of upstream provided freehep.jar)

Hi Andreas, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I'm actually not very keen on really using maven as long as I can > get the package working at all - but I actually have no real clue > what command line would trigger the build process (and upstream) > seems to be dead.  So in

OpenJDK/JamVM Git repository

Hi, fyi: Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5be962.9010...@debia

Re: Setting goals for Wheezy

Hi Ludovic, On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > The current version in experimental is already ... in unstable. :) Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.

Re: Dependence on specific versions

Hi Thomas, On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Thomas Zeeman wrote: > Actually, you can predict it. Given the above order and no outside influences > like a dependencyManagement block in your (parent) pom,  it would be 0.1. See > http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-depende

Re: Dependence on specific versions

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Stefane Fermigier wrote: > On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: >> a.jar (0.1) depends on b.jar (0.1) >> c.jar (0.3) depends on b.jar (0.2) >> d.jar (0.4) depends on a.jar (0.1) and c.jar (0.3) > > A lot of things are wrong

Re: Dependence on specific versions

Hi Stefane, On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Stefane Fermigier wrote: > Only by fixing version numbers of third-party libraries can you be sure that > the same build that works today will still work next week, if you redo the > build on the exact same version of the sources (and Maven, and Jav

Re: question to sun-java6-* and floatingpoint bug

Hi, Am 10.02.2011 12:19, schrieb Niels Thykier: > On 2011-02-10 11:31, Jochen Becker wrote: >> Oracle said they will release a new/fixed java version at the 15th feb., >> when will be such a new version in the stable release as security fix? there is already a fix for openjdk available at

Re: GSoC project to make maven more Debian friendly?

Hi Thomas, On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > I plan to participate in the summer of code, but definitely as a student. are you interested in implementing the Maven stuff as a student? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a s

Re: How to package Nuxeo DM, a Java EE application, in Debian

Am 09.02.2011 16:43, schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: > If the upstream of a library is regularly breaking the ABI (which is not > uncommon), I will add a check in the build system to make sure that I > will find the exact version of the upstream library I am using (it does > help also other distributions)

Re: How to package Nuxeo DM, a Java EE application, in Debian

Am 09.02.2011 15:51, schrieb Stefane Fermigier: > Can we start this discussion over with this option in mind ? There is another option that we should discuss: - distribute all those binary dependencies in a separate package, e.g. nuxeo-nonfree-libs via alioth.d.o or some other inofficial server

Re: How to package Nuxeo DM, a Java EE application, in Debian

Hi, Am 09.02.2011 15:24, schrieb Vincent Fourmond: > The FTPmaster will *never* accept sourceless JARs. we don't accept them into Debian's main component. However they are acceptable for the non-free component as long as it is allowed to redistribute them in binary form. Cheers, Torsten --

Re: Setting goals for Wheezy

Hi, Am 09.02.2011 00:17, schrieb Damien Raude-Morvan: > I've some overlap with your own goals Torsten :) that's good. You can take my tasks. :) > kibi, tuco and I tried and, AFAIK, we all failed. > Have you started working on this ? from upstream "bsd-port" mercurial forest ? I've started with

Re: Setting goals for Wheezy

Hi, I'll probably continue working on dak. That is why I won't have too much time for Java but... - Get JRuby uploaded to main. - Port openjdk to kfreebsd with either hotspot or jamvm. - Ship more pom files. - Find code duplication. Dak may help as soon as it has package contents in its database.

Re: How to package Nuxeo DM, a Java EE application, in Debian

Hi, Am 07.02.2011 09:42, schrieb Stefane Fermigier: > So I guess in this case the root of all evil (like often in the Java world) > comes from Maven... primarily from the (central) Maven repository which is not well maintained. The software Maven is not evil but it has some issues, too. Cheers,

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Florian Weimer: > >> AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are >> re-rebranded as IcedTea. > > Sorry, "re-rebranded as OpenJDK". Oracle occasionally releases source tarballs at

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > How does that follow?  These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for > sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice.  That does not > apply to openjdk, as far as I know. I think that openjdk is not that different. Oracle does

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

Hi Florian, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I suppose we need to disable building the plugin on lenny (it's in a > separate package there anyway, I think).  Is there an easy way to do > this? I think there is some code in debian/rules: ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH)

Re: LAST CALL: Debian @ FOSDEM

Hi Tom, Am 16.12.2010 05:11, schrieb Tom Marble: > We extended our CFP until Friday... > http://wiki.debian.org/Java/DevJam/2011/Fosdem/CallForParticipation thanks for the update. > I'm planning to reprise and update my Jigsaw talk from Debconf. I'll try to improve my Debconf talk. > Submit a

Re: Clear definition of default-java and its scope

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > No. This should not be done. Relying on an alternative for a build makes > problems much harder to debug, if you first have to find out which > alternative is actually used, and which alternative is used for the build. > > I am fine with impr

Re: Clear definition of default-java and its scope

Hi Niels, On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I propose we solve this by explicitly defining default-java to hold the > two definitions I mentioned above (it is the only sane choice for > backwards compatibility as far as I can tell) and post-Squeeze introduce > a "system-defau

Re: libjdom1-java package path

Hi Manuel, On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Manuel Argüelles wrote: > Hi. I installed the libjdom1-java package from squeeze repository on > Debian (testing), but I can't find the classpath when I try to import > this library. For example, I can't do this:    import org.jdom.*; ... > /usr/share/ja

Re: JRE plugin for PPC

Hi Brady, Cc-ing the debian-java list because it is more appropriate for discussions. On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Brady Bilderback wrote: > Hello I run debian and the JRE is not working in the browser. I wanted to > install icedtea-gcjwebplugin, but I can't seem to find it. Basically i was

The real problem with Java in Linux distros

Hi, Thierry posted a nice article at and it is mentioned by Linux Weekly News at with quite a number of comments. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ

Re: RFS: sisc

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:50 PM, David Banks wrote: > Erk.  Fixed. uploaded Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinrv1m+_r3mqmfsy3w

Re: RFS: sisc

Hi David, On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, David Banks wrote: > I uploaded a new version of the package. your package is targeted to stable. You probably want to change that to unstable. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Re: RFS: sisc

Hi David, On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM, David Banks wrote: > Not quite sure what you mean here?  which file? sorry for that. At least the copyright holders and/or licenses of the following files are not documented: doc/sss/dbparam.dsl doc/esub2acm.cls src/sisc/modules/srfi/srfi-*.scm Cheers

Re: Which is the proper directory for user webapps in Tomcat6

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:44 PM, David Goodenough wrote: > Well in my installation it is not group writable.  That is exactly the > problem.  I installed it from a deb file, using apt-get in the normal way. The postinst script runs chmod 775 /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps and that means that I have n

Re: RFS: libjsr305-java (new package, needed to update libgoogle-collections-java and to package libguava-java)

Hi Miguel, On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I added a clarification in the copyright file. > You can review it in the repo. I have uploaded the package. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: RFS: libjsr305-java (new package, needed to update libgoogle-collections-java and to package libguava-java)

Am 08.09.2010 22:36, schrieb Miguel Landaeta: > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: >> However, I think it would be easier if I can get the author to >> relicense those classes. I'll try to get in contact with Brian Goetz. > > Or instead of bothering again this person, could I

Re: Ant can't find checkstyle

Hi Dmitrijs, On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > So I'm gonna try to purge all "external" jar from the source tree and > try to build just jsword core library and bibledesktop app. And then > finally I'm gonna start trying to debanise those. Is this generally > the "right"

Re: Which is the proper directory for user webapps in Tomcat6

Hi David, On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:49 PM, David Goodenough wrote: > I am sure I have a memory in a previous Tomcat package that there was > a directory (other than the direct /var/lib/tomcat6/webapps) that we were > supposed to use to install web apps.  This directory had write permission > from

Re: RFS: libjsr305-java (new package, needed to update libgoogle-collections-java and to package libguava-java)

Hi Miguel, On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: > I'll check your package later. sorry for the delay. There are some CC 2.5 licensed files and that would make the package non-free. I think they are from the libjcip-annotations-java package and they got re-licensed t

Re: What should I do on FTBFS on hppa against gcj?

Hi Thomas, Am 01.09.2010 12:14, schrieb Thomas Koch: > I thought, that hppa should also use openjdk? Can I just ignore the bug or > should I exclude hppa, can I build-conflict with gcj :-)? feel free to ignore hppa bugs. It is no longer a release architecture. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: Problem with HA-JDBC and Tomat-6

Hi Tony, Am 31.08.2010 15:27, schrieb tony mancill: > On 08/31/2010 06:08 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: >> that is wrong. The $HOME of the tomcat6 user should be owned by >> tomcat6:tomcat6 instead of root:root. > > I'm not sure sure making /usr/share/tomcat6 writable

Re: Problem with HA-JDBC and Tomat-6

Hi David, Am 31.08.2010 11:55, schrieb David Goodenough: > But with the Debian Tomcat6, user.home points at /usr/share/tomcat6 > which is not writable by the tomcat6 user. that is wrong. The $HOME of the tomcat6 user should be owned by tomcat6:tomcat6 instead of root:root. > What is the correct

Re: RFS: libjsr305-java (new package, needed to update libgoogle-collections-java and to package libguava-java)

Hi Miguel, On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libjsr305-java". argh, I've already packaged it (see https://launchpad.net/~twerner/+archive/maven) but did not take care of it after Ludovic stopped me packaging Maven3. I'll check yo

Re: Ant can't find checkstyle

Hi Dmitrijs, On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > The upstream build.xml can't find checkstyle.jar and tries to copy > convenience jar from the source tree into /usr/share/ant/lib/ > > How do I tell ant to use checkstyle from /usr/share/java/ ? you should be more verbose. T

Re: System-level JVM - nailgun?

Hi Matt, Am 26.08.2010 14:39, schrieb Matthew Johnson: > One of my colleagues pointed out this to me: > > http://martiansoftware.com/nailgun/index.html > > a possible candidate for solving some of the issues that came up in the > "system-level JVM" talk at debconf? I don't know but I've uploade

Re: RFS: gant (new upstream release)

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for this new release of > gant. uploaded Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: RFS: gmetrics (new package, needed to package CodeNarc)

Hi Miguel, On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I could not reproduce this problem. me too :) . I've uploaded the package now. BTW package names like libgmetrics-groovy-java do not really make sense. This is not your fault of course. I think we should change the policy afte

unblock: java-common/0.40

reopen 592697 thanks Hi, thanks for unblocking 0.39 but my upload did not work as expected because the arch any packages got downgraded on mips. I have introduced an epoch for the arch any packages now. The upload includes the switch to openjdk on powerpcsce as discussed at

Re: RFS: gmetrics (new package, needed to package CodeNarc)

Hi Miguel, On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. there is a problem: $ git-bc dh --with javahelper clean debian/rules override_jh_clean make[1]: Entering directory `/home/twerner/debian/gmetrics' jh_clean ant -f deb

Re: Java webapps and configuration files

Hi Russ, On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > The JSP files for this application need to be conffiles so that users can > change them and those changes are preserved during upgrades. no I don't think that JSP files are good candidates for conffiles. Web.xml is okay but not code

Re: Bug #592218 : RFP: maven3 -- Java software project management and comprehension tool

Hi Ludovic, thanks for your reply! On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > I would not start packaging Maven 3 at this time. It's still in a lot of > flux, and there are several important library changes (a pending switch from > plexus-container My intention was to start updat

Re: Bug #592218 : RFP: maven3 -- Java software project management and comprehension tool

Hi, On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Maven 3.x is still in beta stage [1] and Debian Squeeze 6.0 is now frozen so > it may not be a high priority package. > > If someone have enough time to package this (ie. based on maven2 package + all > new runtime dependencies),

  1   2   3   4   >