Re: Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-04 Thread Tom Tromey
Andrew> To be clear: the two class loaders being checked are those of Andrew> interface org.eclipse.core.runtime.IPluginDescriptor Andrew> and Andrew> class org.eclipse.core.runtime.Platform Andrew> Tromey: are you quite sure we should be checking the class loader Andrew> of the interface type

Re: Endianness in UTF-16 encoding

2006-09-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Marcus" == Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marcus> According to Sun's API docs (Charset class), the UTF-16 Marcus> encoding is supposed to default to big-endian. Interesting. Marcus> What confuses me is that I checked the Classpath source for Marcus> OutputStreamWriter, and it d

Re: javadoc errors in pbuilder

2006-05-25 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Charles" == Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Charles> [javadoc] Fetching package list for external documentation set. Charles> [javadoc] java.io.IOException: Stream closed. Charles> [javadoc]at java.io.BufferedInputStream.refill(libgcj.so.7) Charles> [javadoc]at java.

Re: invoking gcj methods from gdb

2006-02-28 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > i.e. 'print simplevar' works, but 'print obj.method()' does not. Andrew> I can't remember what's supposed not to be there and what broke. Inferior method calls for java methods was never implemented. Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: gcj & firefox

2005-08-11 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Laszlo" == Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Is it gcj-4.0 enough to run java applets inside Firefox? Laszlo> Isn't gcj the compiler itself and not a runtime environtment? Yes, "gcj" is, but folks often use that name to refer to the whole thing (gcj + libgcj), and libgcj

Re: [Arnaud Vandyck] Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-04-30 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Michael" == Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I read some mails about the location of the classmap.db file on the >> Fedora mailing list[1], thanks to Mark. Is it possible to specify a >> directory where we could put all the db files and gij could resolve the >> mapping using the

Re: [Arnaud Vandyck] Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-04-29 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If you follow the typical BC compilation approach, libgcj won't care >> what the so files are called. Arnaud> everything is resolved in the database file? I'll try to read the Arnaud> documents you provide. Yeah. The database maps

Re: [Arnaud Vandyck] Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-04-28 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arnaud> One thing I don't like is to change the name of our jars in Arnaud> /usr/share/java. Having the so files reflect the jar file Arnaud> could be good but I don't know if gcj4 will like this idea ;-) If you follow the typical BC co

Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-04-28 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arnaud> I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget Arnaud> if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the Arnaud> jars are arch-indep so they'll not be re-compiled by the buildd's. Ye

Re: test if there is a gain

2005-04-28 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arnaud> About the gcj ABI, it'd be cool to know the plans of the gcj Arnaud> devs before putting efforts in packaging java to native ;-) GCC 4.0 includes the first working version of the BC ABI. However, we don't yet promise actual bin

Re: test if there is a gain

2005-04-28 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Arnaud> As Michael pointed out, we first need to have benchmarks to know if Arnaud> there are real advantages to compile things to native. Also, we could Arnaud> make choice: do we need to build the libs and the apps? only the apps? Arna

Re: GCJ Native Proposal

2005-03-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Barry" == Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Barry> It must be underscored that this is a _potential_ speed gain. We Barry> actually are not certain what speed gains, if any, we will have. There's a fair amount of benchmarking data out there: http://klomp.org/mark/free-vm-benchmar

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni

2004-03-11 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Elias" == Elias Martenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Elias> Going CNI-only would severely limit the number of 3'rd Elias> party component you'd be able to integrate. You can mix and match CNI and JNI in a single process. This happens any time you use JNI in libgcj. Maybe you meant to sa

Re: bugwatcher problems

2004-01-22 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> The Debian kaffe package is compiled with unix-jthreads, but gtk Mark> (java-gnome) needs pthread support. When you recompile kaffe configured Mark> --with-threads=unix-pthreads then you can play with bugwatcher like you Mark> can wit

Re: [kaffe] Re: Bug Status of Kaffe

2004-01-05 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> It seems then that this bug belongs to the gcj-3.3 package, which was Ben> generating the incorrect bytecode. I'm reassigning this accordingly. Any chance you could try gcj cvs? If this bug remains I'd like to get a bugzilla entry for i

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-02-27 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> However, note that SWT is not 64-bit clean. So certain ports Tom> will be very difficult. Jan> File Bugs :) If I read your email right, you're (-> your Jan> firm..) actually a member of the eclipse board, so ... :)) The SWT maintainers

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-02-27 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> However, note that SWT is not 64-bit clean. So certain ports Tom> will be very difficult. Jan> File Bugs :) If I read your email right, you're (-> your Jan> firm..) actually a member of the eclipse board, so ... :)) The SWT maintainers

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-02-27 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jan> AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that Jan> this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux, Jan> doesn't matter, which platform. Jan> Anyway, If it is not possible to build swt on linux/ppc

Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package

2003-02-27 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jan> AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that Jan> this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux, Jan> doesn't matter, which platform. Jan> Anyway, If it is not possible to build swt on linux/ppc

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for >> installation by root. A workaround is to install it in your private >> workspace. Takashi> It looks good. It seems I should modify eclipse code for it:( Eclips

Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5

2003-02-15 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for >> installation by root. A workaround is to install it in your private >> workspace. Takashi> It looks good. It seems I should modify eclipse code for it:( Eclips

Re: Questions about using libpgjava

2003-01-29 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Brett" == Brett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brett> I know that free PostgreSQL JDBC drivers exist in the libpgjava Brett> package, and have them installed. I would like to find out, Brett> however, whether it's possible to use these drivers with any Brett> free Java implementations

Re: Questions about using libpgjava

2003-01-29 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Brett" == Brett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brett> I know that free PostgreSQL JDBC drivers exist in the libpgjava Brett> package, and have them installed. I would like to find out, Brett> however, whether it's possible to use these drivers with any Brett> free Java implementations

Re: GCJ and AWT

2002-11-27 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Antonio" == Antonio Fiol Bonnín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It isn't quite that easy to get the peers, unfortunately. We're >> planning to make the Classpath peers available in gcc 3.4 (it is too >> late for 3.3, bleah). Antonio> Is it possible to get them working, however? Any pointer

Re: GCJ and AWT

2002-11-27 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Antonio" == Antonio Fiol Bonnín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Antonio> As of February 2002, I read on this list archives that AWT was not Antonio> usable. However, it seems that since then things may have changed. Alas, no. We do have most of the java side of AWT written (though there are k

Re: GCJ and AWT

2002-11-27 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Antonio" == Antonio Fiol Bonnín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It isn't quite that easy to get the peers, unfortunately. We're >> planning to make the Classpath peers available in gcc 3.4 (it is too >> late for 3.3, bleah). Antonio> Is it possible to get them working, however? Any pointer

Re: GCJ and AWT

2002-11-27 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Antonio" == Antonio Fiol Bonnín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Antonio> As of February 2002, I read on this list archives that AWT was not Antonio> usable. However, it seems that since then things may have changed. Alas, no. We do have most of the java side of AWT written (though there are k

Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?

2002-11-16 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Kenneth" == Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kenneth> The gij java runtime would not work for my test case (just Kenneth> some simple server/client pairs that come with the nbio Kenneth> distribution) Bummer. Kenneth> The error I got from gij (below my signature) it a little

Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?

2002-11-16 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Kenneth" == Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kenneth> The gij java runtime would not work for my test case (just Kenneth> some simple server/client pairs that come with the nbio Kenneth> distribution) Bummer. Kenneth> The error I got from gij (below my signature) it a little

Re: eclipse packages

2002-10-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Takashi> I built experimental eclipse packages and upload them into following Takashi> apt-line. Have you talked to Seth Nickell about this? I think he was looking at packaging Eclipse for Debian. I'm working on packaging Eclipse for

Re: eclipse packages

2002-10-31 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Takashi" == Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Takashi> I built experimental eclipse packages and upload them into following Takashi> apt-line. Have you talked to Seth Nickell about this? I think he was looking at packaging Eclipse for Debian. I'm working on packaging Eclipse for

Re: Not yet a policy proposal but...

2002-10-19 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Grzegorz> If you look in two places - at #163197 (which says about Grzegorz> conflicting files, like /usr/include/jni.h, and for ex. at Grzegorz> output of: apt-cache show libgcj3-dev Grzegorz> It may not be possible to standarize

Re: Not yet a policy proposal but...

2002-10-19 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Grzegorz> If you look in two places - at #163197 (which says about Grzegorz> conflicting files, like /usr/include/jni.h, and for ex. at Grzegorz> output of: apt-cache show libgcj3-dev Grzegorz> It may not be possible to standarize

Re: gcj and --classpath

2002-10-09 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Adam" == Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> I'm trying to build a large Java program using gcj-3.0, which compiles Adam> using "-classpath a.jar:b.jar:c.jar", but I get lots of errors saying Adam> that classes like String are missing. Before 3.1, -classpath overrode the int

Re: gcj and --classpath

2002-10-09 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Adam" == Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Adam> I'm trying to build a large Java program using gcj-3.0, which compiles Adam> using "-classpath a.jar:b.jar:c.jar", but I get lots of errors saying Adam> that classes like String are missing. Before 3.1, -classpath overrode the in

Re: java policy for debian, shared libraries...

2002-09-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Alex" == T Alexander Popiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I havent tried any other jvm. Java profilers are coded according to the >>> jvmpi specification. >>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/docs/guide/jvmpi/jvmpi.html Alex> You might want to try gij, too... the other jvm in debian main

Re: java policy for debian, shared libraries...

2002-09-17 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Alex" == T Alexander Popiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> I havent tried any other jvm. Java profilers are coded according to the >>> jvmpi specification. >>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.1/docs/guide/jvmpi/jvmpi.html Alex> You might want to try gij, too... the other jvm in debian main

Re: autobuilders and java

2002-08-22 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Michael" == Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> Is there a better/recommended compiler in main that might Michael> compile a fairly involved application that depends on swing? As far as I know there is no free implementation of Swing anywhere. Michael> One example of som

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

2002-08-13 Thread Tom Tromey
>> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding >> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I >> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps). Grzegorz, perhaps you could get Etienne to file a bug report for us. I considered discussing

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

2002-08-13 Thread Tom Tromey
>> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding >> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I >> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps). Grzegorz, perhaps you could get Etienne to file a bug report for us. I considered discussin

Re: Eclipse 2.0 on Debian (unstable?) with GTK

2002-07-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Kevin" == Kevin A Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kevin> I would compile from source but the Eclipse people don't seem Kevin> to know how to organize an OSS project. No kidding. They think they do, though, which makes it worse. I don't know about your specific problem. I do know that

Re: Eclipse 2.0 on Debian (unstable?) with GTK

2002-07-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Kevin" == Kevin A Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kevin> I would compile from source but the Eclipse people don't seem Kevin> to know how to organize an OSS project. No kidding. They think they do, though, which makes it worse. I don't know about your specific problem. I do know tha

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> seems to forbid both code with native parts, and Java code Andrew> compiled to machine binaries with gcj. It seems reasonable to Andrew> me to allow both of these. Does this really need to be part of the java policy? I thought

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andrew> seems to forbid both code with native parts, and Java code Andrew> compiled to machine binaries with gcj. It seems reasonable to Andrew> me to allow both of these. Does this really need to be part of the java policy? I though

Re: Which VM/Compiler

2002-05-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Heiko" == Heiko Garrelts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Heiko> I just want to learn basic Java programming. That means it Heiko> would be enough to have support for non-gui applications. But I Heiko> want the package with the most compatibility to the official Heiko> implementation. The compil

Re: Which VM/Compiler

2002-05-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Heiko" == Heiko Garrelts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Heiko> I just want to learn basic Java programming. That means it Heiko> would be enough to have support for non-gui applications. But I Heiko> want the package with the most compatibility to the official Heiko> implementation. The compi

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Egon" == Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Egon> And the same for gcj? Is there an easy way to port a Ant based Egon> compilation to some Makefile like stuff for compiling with gcj? Egon> Is there a good tutorial on it somewhere? In theory you should be able to use `gij' as a dr

Re: Which VM/Compiler

2002-05-12 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Heiko" == Heiko Garrelts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Heiko> I'm both new to Debian and Java. I wanted to learn Java with a Heiko> free VM and compiler. But which one should I choose? It depends on your needs. Heiko> Which of these possibilities is the best one if you are a Java Heiko> beg

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Egon" == Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Egon> And the same for gcj? Is there an easy way to port a Ant based Egon> compilation to some Makefile like stuff for compiling with gcj? Egon> Is there a good tutorial on it somewhere? In theory you should be able to use `gij' as a d

Re: Which VM/Compiler

2002-05-12 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Heiko" == Heiko Garrelts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Heiko> I'm both new to Debian and Java. I wanted to learn Java with a Heiko> free VM and compiler. But which one should I choose? It depends on your needs. Heiko> Which of these possibilities is the best one if you are a Java Heiko> be

Re: Java2 libraries

2002-05-06 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Phil" == Phil Pinkerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Phil> it is worth a try do I need to install gjc? I am not at my Phil> debian machine , it maybe already there.Il contact the Phil> application vender , perhaps they have a non-

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-06 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Chris" == Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Chris> No, it's not fixed yet. I am still building OOo packages with Chris> an installed Blackdown JDK. Peter is working on removing Java Chris> still. We have a much easier task than Netbeans, since Java Chris> support is an optional ext

Re: Java2 libraries

2002-05-06 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Phil" == Phil Pinkerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Phil> it is worth a try do I need to install gjc? I am not at my Phil> debian machine , it maybe already there.Il contact the Phil> application vender , perhaps they have a non

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-06 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Chris" == Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Chris> No, it's not fixed yet. I am still building OOo packages with Chris> an installed Blackdown JDK. Peter is working on removing Java Chris> still. We have a much easier task than Netbeans, since Java Chris> support is an optional ex

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-03 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Franck" == franck routier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Franck> Did anyone analyse the move Sun made under the Apache Franck> Foundation pressure ? I've read it could lead to truly free Franck> JVM, maybe for java 1.5 ? That's very unlikely. I think the best you can hope for is that you'll

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-03 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Franck" == franck routier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Franck> Did anyone analyse the move Sun made under the Apache Franck> Foundation pressure ? I've read it could lead to truly free Franck> JVM, maybe for java 1.5 ? That's very unlikely. I think the best you can hope for is that you'll

Re: [HS] problem with gdb

2002-04-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Damien" == Damien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Damien> Whe using gdb, I cannot print java.lang.String type object, I get this: Damien> (gdb) print token Damien> $19 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Damien> It seems this is because token is a reference to a string, but Damien> I cannot find a way to pri

Re: [HS] problem with gdb

2002-04-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Damien" == Damien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Damien> Whe using gdb, I cannot print java.lang.String type object, I get this: Damien> (gdb) print token Damien> $19 = java.lang.String@80c88a0 Damien> It seems this is because token is a reference to a string, but Damien> I cannot find a wa

Re: Kaffe porting issues

2001-12-12 Thread Tom Tromey
> "John" == John R Daily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> hppa is not supported at all; the only parisc configuration files John> are for hpux, not linux. This may be circumventable via libffi, John> or the existing hpux configuration files might be useful to John> create linux ones. I'm una

Re: Kaffe porting issues

2001-12-12 Thread Tom Tromey
> "John" == John R Daily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> hppa is not supported at all; the only parisc configuration files John> are for hpux, not linux. This may be circumventable via libffi, John> or the existing hpux configuration files might be useful to John> create linux ones. I'm un

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) >> should be fixed to provide java-runtime. Ben> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the Ben> gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons

Re: kaffe status

2001-11-20 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Well, the gcj runtimes (libgcj or whatever the package name is) >> should be fixed to provide java-runtime. Ben> Oh.. I had figured it was a deliberate decision on behalf of the Ben> gcc maintainers not to provide java-runtime (for reasons

Re: New on the list - java on debian?

2001-11-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Max> So if libgcj interprets the bytecode of dynamically loaded Max> classes (or even whole applications like it is the case in Max> Tomcat), this means that they do not run at native speed. They Max> run at the speed of libgcj's integrated

Re: New on the list - java on debian?

2001-11-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Max> I'm really looking forward to the gcj version that's stable and Max> mature enough for everything.. cool project IMHO. When you say `everything', what do you mean? Java changes constantly. No free software implementation will ever ke

Re: New on the list - java on debian?

2001-11-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Max> So if libgcj interprets the bytecode of dynamically loaded Max> classes (or even whole applications like it is the case in Max> Tomcat), this means that they do not run at native speed. They Max> run at the speed of libgcj's integrate

Re: New on the list - java on debian?

2001-11-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Max> I'm really looking forward to the gcj version that's stable and Max> mature enough for everything.. cool project IMHO. When you say `everything', what do you mean? Java changes constantly. No free software implementation will ever k

Re: New on the list - java on debian?

2001-11-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Max> Does gcj support loading new .JAR files dynamically at run-time Max> like with its .WAR files at all (i.e. creating custom ClassLoader Max> implementations)? I can hardly imagine how it implements that libgcj includes a bytecode inter

Re: New on the list - java on debian?

2001-11-13 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Max> Does gcj support loading new .JAR files dynamically at run-time Max> like with its .WAR files at all (i.e. creating custom ClassLoader Max> implementations)? I can hardly imagine how it implements that libgcj includes a bytecode inte

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-11 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> What precisely is your objection to this discussion? So we only Ben> have the blackdown port now. Maybe in a year or two kaffe will Ben> support java2. Maybe the gcj people will support java2. Maybe Ben> not. The core parts of libgcj

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-11 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> What precisely is your objection to this discussion? So we only Ben> have the blackdown port now. Maybe in a year or two kaffe will Ben> support java2. Maybe the gcj people will support java2. Maybe Ben> not. The core parts of libgcj

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

2001-04-09 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Joe" == Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joe> Does the GNU definition say that the arch-independent stuff Joe> "must" or "should" go there, or do they just say that it "can"? Joe> Is /usr/lib/appname just as legal for the stuff that's Joe> arch-independent or is it discouraged? GNU

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

2001-04-09 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Joe" == Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joe> Does the GNU definition say that the arch-independent stuff Joe> "must" or "should" go there, or do they just say that it "can"? Joe> Is /usr/lib/appname just as legal for the stuff that's Joe> arch-independent or is it discouraged? GN

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

2001-04-06 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Joe" == Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> * Maybe putting jvm implementation jars in /usr/share/java/$impl >> is the solution. Joe> Well, to me, "share" means share, which the jvm-specific libs Joe> aren't meant for. FYI, traditionally `share' has actually meant `architecture-in

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

2001-04-06 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Joe" == Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> * Maybe putting jvm implementation jars in /usr/share/java/$impl >> is the solution. Joe> Well, to me, "share" means share, which the jvm-specific libs Joe> aren't meant for. FYI, traditionally `share' has actually meant `architecture-i

Re: java library installation issues

2001-04-04 Thread Tom Tromey
>> The `L.so' in this case should probably follow the naming scheme we >> adopted for the `.so' files that Class.forName will automatically try >> to load. That will make it so that the linker and Class.forName will >> agree -- it won't matter to the end program whether a class is loaded >> at run

Re: java library installation issues

2001-04-04 Thread Tom Tromey
>> The `L.so' in this case should probably follow the naming scheme we >> adopted for the `.so' files that Class.forName will automatically try >> to load. That will make it so that the linker and Class.forName will >> agree -- it won't matter to the end program whether a class is loaded >> at ru

Re: java library installation issues

2001-04-04 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Per" == Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Per> So to summarize: The builtin search path should be (in this order): Per> (1) each .jar file in /usr/share/java/$implementation Per> (2) each .jar file in /usr/share/java Per> (3) the /usr/share/java directory itself I think we'll need a

Re: java library installation issues

2001-04-04 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Per" == Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Per> So to summarize: The builtin search path should be (in this order): Per> (1) each .jar file in /usr/share/java/$implementation Per> (2) each .jar file in /usr/share/java Per> (3) the /usr/share/java directory itself I think we'll need

Re: required packages

2001-01-29 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andy" == Andrew D Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andy> I've been trying to compile some old programs that I wrote in Andy> college and when I invoke gcj: Andy> gcj myfirst.java Andy> I get the following errors: You don't mention what version of gcj you are using. Andy> myfirst.java:2:

Re: required packages

2001-01-29 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andy" == Andrew D Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andy> I've been trying to compile some old programs that I wrote in Andy> college and when I invoke gcj: Andy> gcj myfirst.java Andy> I get the following errors: You don't mention what version of gcj you are using. Andy> myfirst.java:2:

Re: JServ and Kaffe (Was: JSP error on simple page.)

2000-11-01 Thread Tom Tromey
>> Could you describe me JServ problems with Kaffe ? Andreas> I had problems with JServ and Kaffe. I don't know about Kaffe, but it might interest you to know that I've successfully run JServ with gcj. I made a compiled JServ that can then load compiled or interpreted servlets. This required a

Re: JServ and Kaffe (Was: JSP error on simple page.)

2000-11-01 Thread Tom Tromey
>> Could you describe me JServ problems with Kaffe ? Andreas> I had problems with JServ and Kaffe. I don't know about Kaffe, but it might interest you to know that I've successfully run JServ with gcj. I made a compiled JServ that can then load compiled or interpreted servlets. This required a

Re: Please help: JServ logging not solved yet

2000-04-12 Thread Tom Tromey
Andreas> OK, I've thought about that, but my problem (as unexperienced Andreas> Java programmer!) is, that I can't see the log() method in Andreas> the classes I use. So write a PrintStream subclass which calls log(), create it at startup from a place where log() is visible, and call System.setOut

Re: Latest version of the Debian/JAVA FAQ

2000-03-21 Thread Tom Tromey
>> `gcj' does not support JNI, and in previous inquiries to Cygnus, we >> did not get get the impression that JNI is a priority. IIRC Tom >> Tromey said that JNI could be implemented on top of CNI, and that >> outside contributors are welcome to add it. Per> I bel

Re: Latest version of the Debian/JAVA FAQ

2000-03-20 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Javier" == Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Javier> Gcj can also compile .java to .class. It currently does Javier> not handle inner classes, but that is being actively Javier> worked on. The current cvs version of gcj handles all JDK 1.1 constructs, inc

Re: Forte for Java Open source announcement

2000-03-16 Thread Tom Tromey
>> >Sun issued the following announcement yesterday afternoon about releasing >> >the Forte for Java code to the open source community. Andreas> Just for the sake of interest and because I'm to stupid to Andreas> understand such legal issues: Does this possibly have the Andreas> consequence that

Re: Fwd: libgcj / Classpath relicensing and cooperation

2000-03-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Stephane" == Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephane> I think it is an important announce for Free Java. No date Stephane> given for release, unfortunately: Release schedules are independent of this. We hope to have a greatly revised libgcj in the next gcc release (probabl