On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 8:56 PM Tiago Daitx wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This particular exception is being thrown by the call to unlinkat [1]
> which calls native unlinkat. Man page for unlinkat describes EISDIR
> error [2] as:
> "EISDIR pathname refers to a directory, and AT_REM
Hi,
This particular exception is being thrown by the call to unlinkat [1]
which calls native unlinkat. Man page for unlinkat describes EISDIR
error [2] as:
"EISDIR pathname refers to a directory, and AT_REMOVEDIR was not
specified in flags."
Assuming unlinkat is telling the truth and this is inde
Hi Martijn,
I somehow missed this email, sorry about that and for the late reply.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:14 AM Martijn Verburg
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Starting a new thread here. I know the Red Hat folks well (AdoptOpenJDK
> hosts their OpenJDK binaries for them from the source tarballs as p
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:59 PM Tiago Daitx wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 6:21 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> > Le 28/05/2019 à 11:11, Paul Wise a écrit :
> >
> > > FTR, uscan is now flexible enough that it can apply arbitrary
> > > transformat
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 6:21 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Le 28/05/2019 à 11:11, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> > FTR, uscan is now flexible enough that it can apply arbitrary
> > transformations to the HTML and download URL so it is easy enough to
> > create a watch file that works:
> >
> > version=4
>
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 2:40 PM tony mancill wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:57:56AM -0200, Tiago Daitx wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have prepared an openjdk-8 update to 8u191, which will fix bugs
> > 911925 [1] and 911847 [2].
>
> Hi Tiago,
>
> I
Hi,
I have prepared an openjdk-8 update to 8u191, which will fix bugs
911925 [1] and 911847 [2].
Before this upload is done it would be very good to have the fix for
jtreg's bug 913853 [3] in place.
This is required/important because I have fixed openjdk-8's
autopkgtests and they will run the ex
Hi,
I have updated the java11-compatibility patch by pulling more changes
from the upstream patch in commit ac15612d41b43c39c. I basically
pulled all the upstream changes in that commit done to
subprojects/base-services/src/main/java/org/gradle/api/JavaVersion.java
and reverted the previous debian
I have taken a quick look at their JCK scripts - including the other
testing bits that the JCK depends upon. They rely a lot on being able
to download stuff on the fly to build the necessary tools. It would
require splitting it in smaller parts and packaging the stuff they
use, might come down from
; 3.x, I'm about
> to test it.
That's awesome, nice work there folks.
>
> I'm gonna push the changes later today.
Ack, thanks for the heads up.
>
>
> 在 2018年3月20日週二 06:03,Tiago Daitx 寫道:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What's missing to get the new maven-
Hi,
What's missing to get the new maven-bundle-plugin +
maven-dependency-tree-2? Is there anything I can help with?
I have been able to fetch and build maven-dependency-tree-2 from git,
but my first try to build maven-bundle-plugin by simply changing the
build-depends to maven-dependency-tree-2-j
Hi,
A simple relocation in jtb fixed the FTBFS - tested for surefire,
javacc-maven-plugin, hawtbuf, avro-java, and activemq-protobuf.
Regards,
Tiago
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Tiago Daitx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tracked down this error to a change in jtb's pom.xml that changed
&
Hi,
I tracked down this error to a change in jtb's pom.xml that changed
jtb's groupId.
A commit [1] moved from using debian/pom.xml to using upstream's
pom.xml (introduced by [2]), but the problem is that groupId changed
from "edu.ucla.cs.compilers" (original pom.xml [3]) to "edu.purdue.cs"
(new
Hi,
I have been debugging a few build errors in packages that rely on
maven-debian-helper, but so far I haven't found any documentation on
how to actually enable the '-X' or '-e' flags - or pass arguments to
maven for that matter - from the debian/rules file.
Could someone please point me to the
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Le 30/09/2017 à 02:35, Debian FTP Masters a écrit :
>
>> - Stop fiddling around with jvm-*.cfg files. ca-certificates-java
>>has no business with providing an initial cacerts file. This is
>>implemented
15 matches
Mail list logo