On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:19:33 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Thomas Zeeman
wrote:
Actually, you can predict it. Given the above order and no outside
influences like a dependencyManagement block in your (parent) pom, it
would be 0.1. See
http://mave
Hi Jan,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Jan Schulz wrote:
[snip]
> I'm not sure what is happening on your system, but unfortunatelly ant
> will eat more memory than 128MB to compile eclipse. It seems that your
> kernel or anything else on the system wont let it take anything more
> than 128MB and ant gets k
Hi all,
First off: Juergen, thanks for the fast response!
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Eckhart [iso-8859-1] Guthöhrlein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:56:30PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
[snip]
> > Alternatively you could upgrade to 1.4.2-rc1 (see
> > http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/java2
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Eckhart [iso-8859-1] Guthöhrlein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> whenever I start eclipse on debian unstable, it crashes due to an
> "exception in native code outside the VM" with the error log attached
> below. This started some days before christmas. Everything worked fine
> before.
Hi,
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Mariano Garcia wrote:
> An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
> Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0x400ECEA9
> Function=__libc_free+0x49
> Library=/lib/libc.so.6
> [...]
In my experience, signal 11s are usually caused by bad memory.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Dave Howorth wrote:
> Can anybody suggest the best way to install eclipse on woody?
>From the zips at eclipse.org IMHO.
The debs in unstable may work with the motif bindings if you build it from
source, but I'm not sure. I do remember having trouble building it from
source
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Dave Howorth wrote:
> Can anybody suggest the best way to install eclipse on woody?
>From the zips at eclipse.org IMHO.
The debs in unstable may work with the motif bindings if you build it from
source, but I'm not sure. I do remember having trouble building it from
source
On Thu, 15 May 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> I installed Mozilla from the "stable" archive and it works fine with java,
> I think the problem is something I heard about different versions of gcc
> being used to build mozilla and java which causes a conflict, does this
> sound right to an
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, [utf-8] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[install instructions; asume they're correct]
> however, each swing frame I try to launch I've got a crash and the
> follwing error:
>
> An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
> Unexpected Signal : 11 occurre
On Sat, 26 Apr 2003, Zeno Gantner wrote:
> Hello,
> My mozilla (latest from sid) does not accept the java plugin shipped
> with blackdown java. First I tried j2re1.3, now 1.4 - beta (the debian
> packages by blackdown.org, from one of their mirrors).
>
> This page in the BTS mentions a similar (t
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
> I was wondering though... Is Swing the only GUI available? That is, are there
> alternatives? There is AWT ofcourse, but I nevered used that, because Swing
> looked so much better...
Swing builds on top of AWT AFAIK.
There's also SWT from IBM which
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Creepy wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> using blackdown 1.4.1 and mozilla 1.3 @ debian sid here and everything's
> fine.
> Anybody has an idea why this same java and mozilla 1.2 may not work
> together (on another box)? The applets just wont appear, they are just
Could be you have a
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:55:19PM +0100, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
>
> > Check http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html for alternative
> > mirrors. AFAIK these should also have the debs in apt-getable form.
>
> meta
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 06:55:19PM +0100, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
>
> > Check http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html for alternative
> > mirrors. AFAIK these should also have the debs in apt-getable form.
>
> meta
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
[ibiblio mirror gone]
> My question is now, where do I go to get the Blackdown JDK and what
> entry should I put into my sources.list file to keep updated?
Check http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html for alternative
mirrors. AFAIK these sho
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
[ibiblio mirror gone]
> My question is now, where do I go to get the Blackdown JDK and what
> entry should I put into my sources.list file to keep updated?
Check http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html for alternative
mirrors. AFAIK these sho
Hi,
Recently I wanted to check on a few options of javadoc and turned to its
manpage only to find it contained unreadable characters (at least to me
they were). Checking out the rest of the manpages I found most of them to
contain those chars. In gvim they look asian (Japanese?).
Anyone else out
Hi,
Recently I wanted to check on a few options of javadoc and turned to its
manpage only to find it contained unreadable characters (at least to me
they were). Checking out the rest of the manpages I found most of them to
contain those chars. In gvim they look asian (Japanese?).
Anyone else out
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Will there be a version of the JDK that is built with GCC 3.2? Now
> that the transition is on-going in unstable, it would be nice to be
> able to get the JDK in sync with the rest.
>
> eg: You can't use the java plugin with Mozilla anymore because Mo
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Is there some documentation on how to do what I want (satisfy the "j2sdk1.4"
> package dependency) for tomcat4? I saw the man pages for equivs-build and
> equivs-control, but it'd be great if there was something that documented the
> whole proces
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Will there be a version of the JDK that is built with GCC 3.2? Now
> that the transition is on-going in unstable, it would be nice to be
> able to get the JDK in sync with the rest.
>
> eg: You can't use the java plugin with Mozilla anymore because Mo
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Is there some documentation on how to do what I want (satisfy the "j2sdk1.4"
> package dependency) for tomcat4? I saw the man pages for equivs-build and
> equivs-control, but it'd be great if there was something that documented the
> whole proces
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> > There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for
> >
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: "Thomas J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> > There's another problem as well, those dirs are only available for
> >
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: "Caoilte O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:55:46 +
> > I want to install the easystruts plugin. so i,
> > ...
> > It's like the gtk widget being used is broken and I can't sele
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: "Caoilte O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 13:55:46 +
> > I want to install the easystruts plugin. so i,
> > ...
> > It's like the gtk widget being used is broken and I can't sele
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > I rebuild on Eclipse with sid. But 2.1M5 didn't work with libmotif3. I
> > changed to gtk binding and uploaded new packages.
> >
> > New packages should work and build with sid. Howeve
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2003 10:17 am, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > I rebuild on Eclipse with sid. But 2.1M5 didn't work with libmotif3. I
> > changed to gtk binding and uploaded new packages.
> >
> > New packages should work and build with sid. Howeve
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
> > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation
> > I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2.
>
> I rebui
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Roberto Franchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Debianized Eclipse 2.1M5
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:18:47 +0100
> > I can't install libmotif, since libmotif doesn't exists. On my workstation
> > I've got libmotif3 an lesstif2.
>
> I rebui
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Roberto Franchini wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:52, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
> > now. Please check here:
> >
> > http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
>
> I try this packages, but somethig doe
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Roberto Franchini wrote:
> On Sunday 09 February 2003 02:52, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> > I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
> > now. Please check here:
> >
> > http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
>
> I try this packages, but somethig doe
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> I have couple of question which. probably, should be in local FAQ.
>
> 1. We do not have any java SE in debian, even in non-free?
Grzegorz Prokopski has created a debian-metapackage called free-java-sdk
in an attempt to bundle various OSS java t
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> I have couple of question which. probably, should be in local FAQ.
>
> 1. We do not have any java SE in debian, even in non-free?
Grzegorz Prokopski has created a debian-metapackage called free-java-sdk
in an attempt to bundle various OSS java t
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Tom Badran wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 Dec 2002 7:20 pm, Miguel Rubio wrote:
> > Does someone know what's happening, and how to solve it ?
>
> Upgrade mozilla. Mozilla built against old glibc wont work with java.
Nor will any sun/blackdown java < 1.4 work with any libc6 > 2.3 [0
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Tom Badran wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 Dec 2002 7:20 pm, Miguel Rubio wrote:
> > Does someone know what's happening, and how to solve it ?
>
> Upgrade mozilla. Mozilla built against old glibc wont work with java.
Nor will any sun/blackdown java < 1.4 work with any libc6 > 2.3 [0
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> Is someone working to add a 1.4 JDK to debian?
Sun's JDK isn't exactly DFSG and Blackdown and IBM's version have similar
problems. Currently they're even impossible to include in the non-free
section due to some legal issues[0].
However, thanks to
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> Is someone working to add a 1.4 JDK to debian?
Sun's JDK isn't exactly DFSG and Blackdown and IBM's version have similar
problems. Currently they're even impossible to include in the non-free
section due to some legal issues[0].
However, thanks to
On 27 Sep 2002, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas J Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas> The debianised blackdown jdk. It's still at a version 1+
> Thomas> years old and multiple releases have seen the light of
&
On 27 Sep 2002, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas J Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas> The debianised blackdown jdk. It's still at a version 1+
> Thomas> years old and multiple releases have seen the light of
&
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tom Badran wrote:
> >
> >>have the sun jdk installed and dont want to install the blackdown one just
> >>to
> >>
> >
> >Someone mention
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> Thomas J. Zeeman wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tom Badran wrote:
> >
> >>have the sun jdk installed and dont want to install the blackdown one just to
> >>
> >
> >Someone mentioned he
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tom Badran wrote:
> Is there a dummy debian package available that provides this or j2re1.3? I
The dummy-package is gone from the archive, but in the latest java-policy
there's a section on creating your own dummy package through the use of
the equivs-package. It can be fou
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tom Badran wrote:
> Is there a dummy debian package available that provides this or j2re1.3? I
The dummy-package is gone from the archive, but in the latest java-policy
there's a section on creating your own dummy package through the use of
the equivs-package. It can be fo
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> The blackdown packages don't show in the lists I get via apt-get update
Yup. blackdown has it's own mirrors and the inclusion of their debs in
Debian is hindered by some legalese. Something to do with being liable.
Search the archive for more info.
> o
On Wed, 15 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Which is ridiculous because the officially provided package from Sun
> > installs fine on a Debian machine.
> yes, it is, but it *seems* an hacking, not a good solution.
Hmm. And how does one see installing an app form source on a
debian-machine
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Hill, Benjamin W wrote:
> >AFAIK there's no debian-package of the official Sun J2EE/J2SE, but that
> >doesn't mean you can't install the rpm or the tar.gz package.
>
> Does this not come under the terms of Sun Licensing? Is anyone else allowed
> to package the SDK?
IIRC the
HI,
> my company is starting to use debian as server to develop java, however
> my boss noticed that there is no SUN j2ee/j2sdk (official or not)
> 1.3/1.4 release for debian.
AFAIK there's no debian-package of the official Sun J2EE/J2SE, but that
doesn't mean you can't install the rpm or the ta
On Wed, 15 May 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Which is ridiculous because the officially provided package from Sun
> > installs fine on a Debian machine.
> yes, it is, but it *seems* an hacking, not a good solution.
Hmm. And how does one see installing an app form source on a
debian-machin
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Hill, Benjamin W wrote:
> >AFAIK there's no debian-package of the official Sun J2EE/J2SE, but that
> >doesn't mean you can't install the rpm or the tar.gz package.
>
> Does this not come under the terms of Sun Licensing? Is anyone else allowed
> to package the SDK?
IIRC the
HI,
> my company is starting to use debian as server to develop java, however
> my boss noticed that there is no SUN j2ee/j2sdk (official or not)
> 1.3/1.4 release for debian.
AFAIK there's no debian-package of the official Sun J2EE/J2SE, but that
doesn't mean you can't install the rpm or the t
On 6 Mar 2002, Thomas Duffy wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 11:39, jmt wrote:
> > Is the
> > j2sdk1.3.0 I downloaded use the 64 bits feature of the sparc processor ?
AFAIK the 64-bits SPARC parts are introduced in Java 2 v1.4 so I'ld think
you're oout of luck there.
> I did not think sun release
On 6 Mar 2002, Thomas Duffy wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 11:39, jmt wrote:
> > Is the
> > j2sdk1.3.0 I downloaded use the 64 bits feature of the sparc processor ?
AFAIK the 64-bits SPARC parts are introduced in Java 2 v1.4 so I'ld think
you're oout of luck there.
> I did not think sun releas
53 matches
Mail list logo
