On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 18.08.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> [...]
>
> I have made some minor changes and pushed them to the git repository. I
> hope that's OK. We should probably scale Azureus.png to 128x128 pixel
> (currently
On Tue, 18 Aug 2015, 03:33 tony mancill wrote:
On 08/12/2015 04:35 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0,
Hi Stephen,
I haven't looked at the packaging yet, but I know that represents a lot
of work - awesome.
I wanted to mention one
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, 23:11 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 13/08/2015 01:35, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0,
Well done Stephen! Do you think it's possible to backport it to Jessie,
or does the packaging depend on too many new elements
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, 22:25 Markus Koschany wrote:
Am 13.08.2015 um 01:35 schrieb Stephen Nelson:
> I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0
>
I could successfully compile the package but I need a little bit more
time to dig into Azureus/Vuze. I'll get back t
I've updated Azureus/Vuze to the latest version 5.6.2.0, as well as:
- Removed bundled bouncy castle library
- Removed bundled commons library
- Removed bundled json simple library
- Build against swt4
- Updated the copyright file to correct licence on some files
If anyone has time, please can y
I think there's some error with the upload of groovy2 as I've received
hundreds of copies of this message.
Who should I contact/file a bug against ?
-- Forwarded message -
From: Debian FTP Masters
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:13
Subject: Processing of groovy2_2.4.3+dfsg-1_amd64.chan
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:36 Markus Koschany wrote:
On 24.04.2015 12:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to share my goals for the next release, feel free to comment
> and add yours as well so we can coordinate our efforts on the
> overlapping topics.
Hi,
my personal goals for Stretc
On 27 Nov 2014 12:18, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote:
>
>
> I'm indeed working on the libspring-java upgrade to the version 3.2.12.
> The propdeps plugin was easy to package and I hope the FTP masters will
> quickly validate it, but if I can't get it in Jessie with the Spring
> update I'll probably follow
Hi all,
I was trying to build maven from source but I'm getting an error using
git-buildpackage. I'm guessing the issue is to do with my environment but
not sure what it is. I've attached the relevant build log to the email. Any
ideas?
Many thanks,
Stephen
stephen@debian-build:~/maven/maven$ git
Hi,
I noticed Emmanuel is packaging the gradle plugins to be able to package
Spring 3.2.x. That's definitely the way to go for the future as upstream is
using it.
However as a pragmatic option I noticed that Redhat/Fedora took a clever
approach and they are downloading the .pom files published by
On 26 Nov 2014 10:45, "Raphael Hertzog" wrote:
>
> Hello Stephen,
>
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> > > For what it's worth, CVE-2014-3578 was assigned to a directory
traversal
> > > vulnerability in libspring-java
> &g
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> There is another point worth discussing I think. When we want to fork a
> package foo 1.0 because the version 2.0 is incompatible, do we:
>
> 1. duplicate the package foo as foo-1 and upgrade foo to the version 2.
> Every reverse dependency
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:55 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> I just checked and it builds fine for me, but I suspect that it's
> because my cowbuilder bind mounts my build area so that its path looks
> the same to the bits of the build that run before entering the chroot to
> those after entering that
Hi,
I've started work on backporting CVE-2014-0255 [1] to the version of Spring
in wheezy to fix [2]. However I'm having a few problems building it in
pbuilder/cowbuilder and wondered if anyone has any pointers to get it
building?
I'm getting the following error:
BUILD FAILED
/home/stephen/sprin
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:05 PM, tony mancill
> wrote:
>
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Great that someone has taken this on. I'll take a look this week.
>
> Cheers,
> tony
>
> Hi Tony,
I don't know if you had a chance to look at this package yet? I do still
need to make some changes to the copyrig
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 01/08/2014 16:59, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
>
>> I wonder if the newer JDK is triggering this instability
>> in the tests? Otherwise with this amount of instability, bugs would
>> have been raised against ups
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:09:54PM +0100, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>>
>> Any ideas, or a fresh pair of eyes on this? I've committed some packaging
>> refresh changes already to the Debian repository, but not actually
;
> On 30/07/14 21:21, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>>>
>>> Usually, it is better to send the patch in the bug itself and if the
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>
> Usually, it is better to send the patch in the bug itself and if there
> is no activity for a few days (on RC bugs),
> you can ask for a sponsor on the mailing list.
> Howe
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 30/07/2014 18:46, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java"
> Did you check with Matthew before?
>> It builds thos
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java"
It builds those binary packages:
- libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J
- libxmltooling-java-doc - Documentation for XMLTooling-J
The upload is to fix an RC bug #752963 where the package FTBFS. I
added a missing build dependency
I'm trying to fix a RC bug in lucene2 [1] which seems to be intermittent as
I've had it build successfully and fail exactly as the bug indicates in
subsequent builds.
I've tried looking in the Apache repository for an indication of fixes for
the bug but I haven't found anything that accurately ref
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 18/07/2014 06:30, tony mancill a écrit :
> > I'm adding Dave Beckett to the cc:, as he had put together packages for
> > 2.10.3 and 2.10.4 back in April, and may have interest in the this
> > effort. Medhi had raised concerns about tho
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:54 PM, tony mancill wrote:
>
> I think it would be fine to merge the teams if that suits the Clojure
> maintainers. There was discussion of doing the same for Debian Scala
> Maintainers, although it hasn't happened yet (I think mostly because
> there hasn't been another
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:05 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> On 06/24/2014 05:08 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> > I've updated the Azureus/Vuze package [1] to incorporate the latest
> > upstream and remove a lot of bundled code already packaged in Debian.
> >
> > I would
I've updated the Azureus/Vuze package [1] to incorporate the latest
upstream and remove a lot of bundled code already packaged in Debian.
I would appreciate it if anyone has the time to look at the changes to see
if they are suitable to request an upload of the package?
I have kept the changes in
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Stephen Nelson
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:07 PM, tony wrote:
> > The package is still in the NEW queue, awaiting review by the FTP team:
> >
> > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/swt4-gtk_4.3.2-1.html
> >
>
I see this pac
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:07 PM, tony wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:46:48PM +0100, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> Did this package get uploaded to unstable? I can't seem to find it at
>> packages.d.o or packages.qa.d.o but I'm possibly look
t;
> Thank you for helping get the new version packaged.
> tony
>
>
>
Hi Tony,
Did this package get uploaded to unstable? I can't seem to find it at
packages.d.o or packages.qa.d.o but I'm possibly looking in the incorrect
place.
Many thanks
Stephen
--
*Stephen Nelson*
*T:* 07595 300729
*E:* step...@eccostudio.com
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> Hi Bálint,
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:51:38AM +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> >
>> > Sorry I can't be more useful for this bug at this moment.
> If I uploaded groovy 2.2.1 to unstable now I would break gradle and
> groovy itself by caus
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Jakub Adam wrote:
>
> SWT 4 is not such big a problem, package for 4.3 is almost done[1]; if there
> is demand for having it in Debian, I guess I can finish and RFS it during
> the
> week.
>
> We still need SWT 3.8 for our Eclipse, so 4.3 will be installable in
> p
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 23.03.2014 18:05, Stephen Nelson wrote:
>
> freemind, freeplane or freecol are like azureus CDBS based, so I suggest
> to take a look at those packages first. If you want to try out dh +
> javahelper, I recom
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:02 PM, tony mancill wrote:
> On 03/23/2014 10:05 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I don't know of a good Java UI package to use as an example, and I'm not
> sure that you really need one. The difficulty with Azureus/Vuze (that
> kept from uploading 4.8
Hi team,
I had a look at packaging the latest release of Azureus/Vuze and have
managed to get the app working without too many issues. Some bugs against
the package indicate the current packaging isn't up to scratch.
I've not worked on packaging a Java application that has a UI, so I was
wonderin
emove Michael Koch from uploaders. (Closes: #654082)
* Add Stephen Nelson to uploaders.
* Update the Vcs fields.
* Use debhelper version 9.
* Provide Maven artifact. (Closes: #729021)
* Fix deprecation warnings in debian/rules
Many thanks
Stephen Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 11/03/2014 22:02, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
>>
> If I'm not mistaken this lintian rule isn't checked when the packages
> are uploaded, so you can just ignore it:
>
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/static/lin
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/03/2014 23:08, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
>
>> I'm working on the libjibx1.2-java package to provide Maven artifacts
>> to allow a newer version of Spring to be packaged. I'm getting a
>> Lintian er
Hi Java team,
I'm working on the libjibx1.2-java package to provide Maven artifacts
to allow a newer version of Spring to be packaged. I'm getting a
Lintian error [1] as the documentation has a link to Sourceforge with
a tracking id in it.
I thought I should be able to remove it from the template
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:37 PM, James Page wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Team
>
> I'm writing here first before I file a formal RFH or O in the hope
> that someone in the team might have the capacity to take up the mantle
> of maintaining Jenkins in Debian.
>
H
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> You can push the changes now, Markus fixed the permissions.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
Great! Thanks to you and Markus.
--
Stephen Nelson
T: 07595 300729
E: step...@eccostudio.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I moved the repository and changed the hooks. You can clone it from:
>
> ssh+git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/joptsimple.git
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
Hi Emmanuel
I've just tried to push to the repository but I'm getting permission errors:
r
into the
current codebase as it should clear the grave bug and shouldn't impact
the r-deps.
I'm working on a local branch right now so I'll be sure not to push
anything into master for the time being.
Thanks
Stephen
--
Stephen Nelson
T: 07595 300729
E: step...@eccostudio.co
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I moved the repository and changed the hooks. You can clone it from:
>
> ssh+git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/joptsimple.git
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
Hi Emmanuel
Thanks for the info and doing the changes. I don't think I am a member
of colla
I raised a bug against libjoptsimple-java to provide maven artifacts
that would assist in packaging the latest version of Spring. See [1].
The maintainer is happy for the package to be maintained by the Debian
Java group. I just wondered what the process should be to move the
existing Git reposito
I'm working through the Spring 3.2.x packaging which uses the build
tool - gradle. Also, one of Spring's dependencies is using it
[Hibernate 4] along with gradle itself and groovy.
It's definitely increasing in popularity with open source java
projects. I think it may have the necessary traction t
I am working on the packaging for Spring 3.2.x and it depends on
jruby. Looking at the QA page [1] it appears to be part of a ruby 1.8
removal. So I wondered if anyone is packaging the later version or
what the plan is?
There are also dependencies on hibernate 4.x. I see that 3 is already
packaged
I'm looking at packaging a new upstream version of libspring-java.
However upstream has switched to using gradle to build the code. What
is the correct way to package for Debian in this instance?
Many thanks
Stephen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> On Monday, September 2, 2013, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>
>> Le 02/09/2013 17:55, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
>>
>> > Thanks for finding that commit. I'll try and build with this later
>> > version
On Monday, September 2, 2013, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 02/09/2013 17:55, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
>
> > Thanks for finding that commit. I'll try and build with this later
> > version and see how it goes. As it's a breaking API change how can I
> > easily f
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> The build failure has been fixed upstream but it hasn't been released yet:
>
> https://github.com/jmock-developers/jmock-library/commit/6758febcbd09caf7db90df473fe84f5f41eb6037
>
> You could probably try to upgrade the package to this revisio
There's a bug in the jmock project [1] that is blocking the packaging
of openjpa. There is also the more severe FTBFS bug [2] which might
require a breaking change to the api according to the author [3]. I
was intending to look into this in more detail and attempt to fix this
if no one else is work
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Eugenio Cano-Manuel Mendoza
wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> I think I figured out the issue you encountered. Could you build and
>> install maven-debian-helper from the source on alioth and try again
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I think I figured out the issue you encountered. Could you build and
> install maven-debian-helper from the source on alioth and try again please?
>
> If it keeps failing you can work around the issue by disabling the
> gener
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> What project are you trying to package? I'll give it a look.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
Hi Emmanuel,
It was the openjpa project. The Debian package currently uses Ant to
build but the source code itself uses Maven. I'm trying t
ciesSolver.saveSubstvars(DependenciesSolver.java:193)
> at
> org.debian.maven.packager.DependenciesSolver.main(DependenciesSolver.java:904)
I'm trying to produce a Debian package from source built using maven.
I'm using maven-debian-helper version 1.6.5.
Many thanks
Stephen Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
eady looking at it.
Stephen Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAHpHs3kd7FCAFu=x0b=vuwe1erbpzg9qvecfjpdkczepgeb...@mail.gmail.com
ore I begin any
changes on tomcat6.
If there are other projects that need some simple work doing on them
I'm happy to help where I can. Is there a priority list of tasks
available? I'm a decent Java developer, pretty familiar with Debian
but only knowledgeable about packaging from a
file
* Fix FTBFS with ecj 3.8 (closes: #717279, #713796)
* Updated the standards version to 3.9.4 - no changes
* Updated the Vcs-Git field to the canonical url
http://mentors.debian.net/package/tomcat6
Many thanks,
Stephen Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debia
stage. I will also contact the regular maintainer to check
I'm not duplicating effort.
Stephen Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cahphs3k6f0vasmwrpxwd2o1ijpnja9aze7hqvnnhbxg7b65...@mail.gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 31/07/2013 00:17, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
>>
>>> --- a/debian/watch
>>> +++ b/debian/watch
>>> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>>> versi
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 31/07/2013 00:17, Stephen Nelson a écrit :
>
>> --- a/debian/watch
>> +++ b/debian/watch
>> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>> version=3
>> opts=uversionmangle=s/_/./g \
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been following the list for a while now, read quite a few of the
> Debian java wiki pages and finally got started on a simple packaging
> fix. I chose the tomcat6 project as it had a broken watch file. I
&
Hi,
I've been following the list for a while now, read quite a few of the
Debian java wiki pages and finally got started on a simple packaging
fix. I chose the tomcat6 project as it had a broken watch file. I
managed to fix that but when I try to re-build the package using:
dpkg-buildpackage -us
63 matches
Mail list logo
