* Fathi Boudra | 2010-01-06 15:00:41 [+0100]:
>About option 3, it means default-jdk build-dependency removal on hppa and hurd
>architectures so all jars won't be built/shipped on these architectures too.
I reopenend that bug due to the duct tape part here, hope that is okay.
Excluding "a few" ar
* Niels Thykier | 2010-08-22 17:02:22 [+0200]:
>I have committed the patch to the SVN. I intend to upload this after
>java-common 0.39 migrates to testing (waiting for the mips binaries).
Thanks for that. You don't have to upload the package just due to this
change. I uploaded a changed version i
* Matthew Johnson | 2010-08-22 15:01:23 [+0100]:
>On Sun Aug 22 14:41, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> The problem with the default-jdk is that most architectures have openjdk
>> as default. Some packages however don't build with default-jdk !=
>> openjdk. One of
* Niels Thykier | 2010-08-21 16:13:34 [+0200]:
>Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
>Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
>if we should do it now or after Squeeze (CC'ed the release team) for
>their comments.
The problem with th
Package: java-common
Version: 0.39
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch sid
User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
Usertags: powerpcspe
openjdk is built and seems to work :)
Sebastian
>From acf94f0bb47b151b9fde8b07948b5194dd3d81de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Thu,
5 matches
Mail list logo
