Vincent Privat, le dim. 07 avril 2019 21:55:33 +0200, a ecrit:
> Disabling it only through accessibility.properties means we have no control
> over it from JOSM. So when the next bug appears, we'll have to tell all of our
> impacted Ubuntu users to modify the file.
We are here only talking about B
Vincent Privat, le dim. 07 avril 2019 14:26:19 +0200, a ecrit:
> If enabled by default, please offer a reliable way for applications to disable
> it.
It has always been available in
/etc/java-11-openjdk/accessibility.properties
> We don't need it for JOSM,
Is there no way for blind people to use
Hello,
Matthias Klose, le sam. 06 avril 2019 15:46:21 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 06.04.19 15:13, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > We're late already, I would want this rather sooner than latter
> > in buster, such that there is some real live testing before we release.
> > Sure, there are chances for bugs, but if
Matthias Klose, le sam. 06 avril 2019 03:04:54 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 01.04.19 17:24, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le lun. 01 avril 2019 15:54:17 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> Vincent Privat, le ven. 24 août 2018 18:33:56 +0200, a ecrit:
> >>> Patching openjdk wi
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 01 avril 2019 15:54:17 +0200, a ecrit:
> Vincent Privat, le ven. 24 août 2018 18:33:56 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Patching openjdk with your try/catch proposal and making the ATK wrapper a
> > Recommends sounds a good idea.
> >
> > Don't wait for
patches/jaw-optional.diff: Make failing to load the Java ATK wrapper
+ non-fatal.
+ * rules: Enable Java ATK wrapper for Buster. Closes: #900912.
+
+ -- Samuel Thibault Sun, 31 Mar 2019 17:49:09 +0200
+
openjdk-11 (11.0.3+4-3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Matthias Klose ]
diff -Nru openjdk-1
Emmanuel Bourg, le lun. 07 janv. 2019 22:25:35 +0100, a ecrit:
> Le 07/01/2019 à 21:13, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
> > Do you have any suggestions for working with the following?: (please
> > reply to -devel)
>
> We've discussed this topic in #903428 and the consensus is roughly that
> it's a wa
Hello,
Vincent Privat, le mer. 22 août 2018 21:01:16 +0200, a ecrit:
> Samuel, do you know when the root issue will be fixed in Java ATK wrapper?
The root issue is in openjdk, not the wrapper. Openjdk has apparently
removed the way that was used to load the wrapper, without apparently
making sure
Vincent Privat, le mar. 21 août 2018 23:27:42 +0200, a ecrit:
> The error is "ClassNotFoundException: org.GNOME.Accessibility.AtkWrapper".
>
> Is it a known issue?
This is #900912
Samuel
Hello,
Steffen Möller, on mer. 30 août 2017 23:09:48 +0200, wrote:
> Do we need to keep version 4.x? As tempted as I am to say "yes", the
> reverse dependencies natbraille and libgradle-android-plugin-java
> compiled smoothly with the new version
I guess that should be fine, then, please feel fr
Hello,
Please have a look at
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797595
Commenting the line in /etc/java-8-openjdk/accessibility.properties may
help with X11 issues, but I believe the ground issue is that the openjdk
awt toolkit doesn't tell X11 that it is using threads, and thus al
Emmanuel Bourg, le Sat 24 Oct 2015 18:37:16 +0200, a écrit :
> Le 24/10/2015 18:13, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>
> > I'm trying to build a newer release of joptsimple (source avaible in the
> > debian repository), and am getting this. I don't really understand what
>
Hello,
I'm trying to build a newer release of joptsimple (source avaible in the
debian repository), and am getting this. I don't really understand what
this means and were to look at.
cd . && /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/bin/java -noverify -cp
/usr/share/maven2/boot/classworlds.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/de
Hello,
Erich Schubert, le Mon 17 Aug 2015 10:28:27 +0200, a écrit :
> I will take care of uploading a new ELKI package (probably end of the
> month, or beginning of september).
> It will have a version number of at least "0.7.0~20150817-1", which is
> > 0.6.5, so above breaks is okay.
> I assume t
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 libc0.3
There was also another issue, which was basically making boehm-gc
completely ignore pointers on the main stack. This was in libc0.3, thus
cloning & reassigning.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Hello,
I've dug a bit more the java failures we've been encountering for some
time. The particular case of simply running gjdoc was helpful: an
object gets allocated, then other happens, then the object gets used,
but its method table is completely nuts. It happens that the class
field of the ob
tony mancill, le Wed 09 Jul 2014 22:26:19 -0700, a écrit :
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x012ab278 in gnu.classpath.tools.gjdoc.Main.start(java.lang.String[])int
> (
> this=@80c8eb0, args=@8099f98)
> at
> ../../../../../src/libjava/classpath/tools/gnu/classpath/tools/gjdoc/Main.java:1050
This is:
tony mancill, le Tue 08 Jul 2014 22:20:01 -0700, a écrit :
> Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
SIGUSR1 is benign. Please use
handle USR1 nostop noprint pass
To let gdb continue the program, up to where there actually is an
illegal instruction.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Matthias Klose, le Mon 06 May 2013 16:22:30 +0200, a écrit :
> - hurd never had openjdk support, and afaik, nobody is working on that.
There has been work towards this, notably by Jeremie Koenig. I don't
know the status, we just have not made it a strong priority so far.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Giovanni Mascellani, le Wed 09 Feb 2011 08:42:20 +0100, a écrit :
> On 09/02/2011 02:11, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Giovanni Mascellani, le Tue 08 Feb 2011 14:48:31 +0100, a écrit :
> >> libisorelax-java doesn't ship any .pom file. Please apply the attached
> >
20 matches
Mail list logo
