x27;m sure you don't want to hear this -- but have you started work on
porting 1.5? 1.5 is in beta at the moment, do you have an estimate for
the Blackdown port, and the Debian packages?
Keep up the good work,
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ve JAD enough (and it wasn't removed for legal
reasons) you could maintain it... :)
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 21:35, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Jan, never much bothered about lizensing...
Note that Sun *do* care about licensing, and are willing to approach
anyone who breaches their terms.
Thus anyone doing open-source Java work has to be very careful.
Ross
--
Ross Bur
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 21:35, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Jan, never much bothered about lizensing...
Note that Sun *do* care about licensing, and are willing to approach
anyone who breaches their terms.
Thus anyone doing open-source Java work has to be very careful.
Ross
--
Ross Bur
ages -- the deps for the Ant
1.5.4 are so much greater than 1.4.1 that I still have 1.4.1 on hold.
There should be an ant package which is just the core tasks, and then
split the -optional stuff into seperate packages, maybe putting the
jython stuff into a seperate pacakge of its own.
Ross
--
Ro
ages -- the deps for the Ant
1.5.4 are so much greater than 1.4.1 that I still have 1.4.1 on hold.
There should be an ant package which is just the core tasks, and then
split the -optional stuff into seperate packages, maybe putting the
jython stuff into a seperate pacakge of its own.
Ross
--
Ro
this bit magic? i.e. following the
/usr/bin/java symlink?
> # JARs from /usr/share/java to be added to the class path
> CLASSPATH_JARS=xerces bsf servlet-2.3
Excellent solution.
Looking forward to this...
Ross
--
Ross Burton
this bit magic? i.e. following the
/usr/bin/java symlink?
> # JARs from /usr/share/java to be added to the class path
> CLASSPATH_JARS=xerces bsf servlet-2.3
Excellent solution.
Looking forward to this...
Ross
--
Ross Burton
age all the time... :(
>
> Is the bug also present when the file system is local?
Not sure, check out the Java bug pages on java.sun.com. I know there is
a bug meaning it never creates locks on NFS, there are probably other
bugs too.
Ross
--
Ross Burton
e this
message all the time... :(
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 12:59, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I second this proposal.
I also second this proposal.
At some point I really should upload my libjpcsc-java packages...
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jab
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 12:59, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I second this proposal.
I also second this proposal.
At some point I really should upload my libjpcsc-java packages...
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jab
I second this, as I intend to package some JNI packages soon.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
I second this, as I intend to package some JNI packages soon.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http
a, which depends on architecture dependant libraries in
libfoo-jni.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint
a, which depends on architecture dependant libraries in
libfoo-jni.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint
:
libpcsc-java
libpcsc-java-doc
Now, I've packaged a few simple programs before but never Java. Are
there any small packages out there which use JNI I could look at for
examples?
Regards,
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROT
:
libpcsc-java
libpcsc-java-doc
Now, I've packaged a few simple programs before but never Java. Are
there any small packages out there which use JNI I could look at for
examples?
Regards,
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROT
if java-common maintainer thinks
> too that this would be good. (Because of small size it wouldn't make
> much sense to have separate java-common-dummies package just with them).
May I suggest a debconf note saying that the equivs control files are
included in java-common, so that
r :)
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 14:07, Geoff Beaumont wrote:
> Ross Burton wrote:
> > Is this just me, or does the Blackdown JDK conflict with the java-common
> > package in Sid?
> >
> > Unpacking j2sdk1.3 (from .../j2sdk1.3_1.3.1-1_i386.deb) ...
> > dpkg: error p
/.directory',
which is also in package java2-common
Is this known? Will the Blackdown JDK be fixed to work with the latest
java2-common packages?
Regards,
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 14:07, Geoff Beaumont wrote:
> Ross Burton wrote:
> > Is this just me, or does the Blackdown JDK conflict with the java-common
> > package in Sid?
> >
> > Unpacking j2sdk1.3 (from .../j2sdk1.3_1.3.1-1_i386.deb) ...
> > dpkg: error p
/Java2/.directory',
which is also in package java2-common
Is this known? Will the Blackdown JDK be fixed to work with the latest
java2-common packages?
Regards,
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROT
String = "text"
>if (someString.equals("some text")) {};
Performance will be the same, but (1) is safer is someString could ever
be null, as a NullPointerException will not be throw.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
String = "text"
>if (someString.equals("some text")) {};
Performance will be the same, but (1) is safer is someString could ever
be null, as a NullPointerException will not be throw.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'Excalibur'.
>
> Does anybody have other opinion?
I'm for libavalon-framework-java et al, as that is the full name of the
product, the name of the CVS modules and the names that jpackage use.
Ross Burton
27 matches
Mail list logo
