Hi,
On 23-01-2025 09:26, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
These issues are currently being discussed on debian-java [1].
Would a britney hint or something be appropriate here? We believe that
these reverse dependencies should not block these migrations.
If RC bugs have been filed for all re
Hi,
On 11-02-2021 10:16, Matthias Klose wrote:
> These dependencies should look like:
>
> default-jdk [!hppa !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-any]
>
> or
>
> default-jdk [alpha amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 ia64 m68k mips64el mipsel
> powerpc ppc64 ppc64el riscv64 s390x sh4 sparc64 x32]
>
> It's also o
Hi doko,
On 07-04-2019 12:08, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> I disagree. I'll do the next upload with Samuel's proposed patches, not
>> enabling that by default, together with the planned security update. Then
>> people can start testing if the wrapper works.
>
> Well, I'm afraid that what will happ
Hi
On 06-04-2019 08:55, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> please don't NMU. In the past the atk patches broke the non-atk use case way
>> too
>> often. Maybe you want to upload to a PPA or to experimental to give this a
>> little bit more testing.
>
> Can we then at least upload all changes except enab
4 matches
Mail list logo
