Hi Thomas,
It sounds like a good idea to me.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> - any more?
Logging information / configuration for the application logger?
> Should I open a wiki page to collect more thoughts on this?
Yay for a wiki page.
By the way, if we have strong sup
Hi,
Please submit some topics for tomorrow's BoF.
How are people comfortable with using gobby for notes? (see
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2010/07/DebConf_BoF_HOWTO/ for some
insights on using gobby).
Are we going to have any remote attendees to this BoF? (I hope so :-)
See you tomorrow!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikdpfskop+wdlfteqtgx7+zgfzsgjrgr6ymy...@mail.gmail.com
WORKSFORME ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=aqyge7ezwygpphnjmj3hdywsuomynhk_wo...@mail.gmail.com
My wife [1] and I will be happy to join in, most probably in the
later-ish side. We're moving and we have to clean up and return the
keys of our old place that Saturday but we should be done by noon [2].
I'm planning to stop by Columbia every evening after work starting
tomorrow, so hope to meet w
Niels just pointed out on IRC that the changelog for Jetty on Debian
Sid [1] includes the lines
[ Miguel Landaeta ]
* Enable jetty-plus and jetty-annotations modules. (Closes: #585387).
So it has already been taken care of.
Good to know :-)
Pablo
[1]
http://packages.debian.org/changel
Hi Stian,
On Friday, July 02, 2010, Stian Brattland wrote:
> Hei,
>
> I've installed Jetty on an Ubuntu 9.10 box, using "apt-get install jetty
> libjetty-extra libjetty-extra-java". However, no Jetty Plus files are
> included when i
> install Jetty this way. I am as certain as i could be about th
On Sunday, June 20, 2010, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Torsten Werner wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jcsp".
> >
> > the PDF file has been created by MS Word but the source is missing.
>
>
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Philipp Huebner wrote:
> Now, any ideas how to improve that situation?
> How can I run java applications like the example above remotely _smoothly_?
Have you tried VNC?
P.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
On Friday 30 April 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Pablo--
>
> On 04/30/2010 02:40 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> > Question for DebConf-Team: if we get Rich Hickey to give a talk, does he
> > need to go through the regular talk submission process? (We clearly won't
&g
On Friday 30 April 2010, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> > It makes a lot of sense to me to invite him to give a talk, particularly
> > if he can give some insights about how he sees the language integrated
> > within something as complex as a GNU/Linux distribution.
> >
> > Question for Brian:
nd then either have him
give a talk or have somebody (could be Brian, could be Ramakrishnan, could be
a-yet-to-be-discovered-journalist-among-us) to conduct some sort of
"interview" on stage. What do you think?
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
>
>
On Thursday 29 April 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 29/04/2010 04:26, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> > How do you feel about coordinating a BoF session on non-Java JVM-based
> > languages? That's a very quick to write submission and if Ramakrishnan
> > attends, we will ha
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Pablo Duboue
wrote:
> > * A talk explaining the current state of the Java Policy and where we
> > want to take it in the longer term.
>
> It can be more general: current state of Java in
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 27/04/2010 23:52, Pablo Duboue wrote:
> >> We should encourage related language (e.g. Clojure) talks as well.
> >
> > Indeed. I learned scala because I found about it through Debian :-) I'm
> > CC:ing the Sc
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Pablo Duboue
wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to coordinate a Debian-Java track in DebConf10. We have so far
> > two java-related talks/BoF submitted and Adnan and
(this is an e-mail soliciting talks for a Debian-Java track at
DebConf10, please CC: me unless you also reply to the debian-java
mailing list)
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Tom Marble wrote:
> Pablo Duboue wrote:
>> I'd like to coordinate a Debian-Java track in DebConf10
> S
Hello,
I'd like to coordinate a Debian-Java track in DebConf10. We have so far two
java-related talks/BoF submitted and Adnan and I are preparing a third one.
These are some example talks that I personally would like to attend (the
examples are intended to get those talk-submission creative jui
Package: java-common
Version: 0.34
Severity: wishlist
I don't have the text for this FAQ entry, but at least I got from Niels that
his package libfreemarker is a good example.
The idea is to have an FAQ item related to this text in section 2.4 of policy:
"Java library packages should compile th
Hi Taisuke,
To join debian-java just create an Alioth account and request to join the
debian-java project.
We use the alioth SVN to keep the debian/ bit of our projects under SVN
control (and tag the project every time the package is uploaded into the
Debian archive).
I can do the initial imp
On Sunday 28 March 2010, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just had a conversation with Damien Raude-Morvan and Matthew Johnson
> about the strict dependencies between javadoc packages. We considered
> lowering the requirement from a Depends to a Recommends.
>
> The rationale is that the javadoc is
Hi,
We seek some advice regarding #572982 [1] (azureus, a well-known torrent
client, combines source licensed under incompatible licenses).
From Niels quoted sources, there is no doubt about the incompatibility of GPL
and EPL. But LGPL and EPL might be a different matter and Google has proved
Hi,
On Saturday 20 February 2010, Niels Thykier wrote:
> eclipse comes with its very own set of build scripts and an ant-wrapper
> that eclipse plugins usually use for their compilation (featuring stuff
> like pre and post compile hooks etc.). I cannot recommend attempting to
> emulate this with r
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 à 20:11 +0100, Vincent Fourmond a écrit :
>>> I'm wondering really what could be a decent value for -Xmx parameter.
>>> I used to think that the lowest parameter that seem to let the program
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
I'm attending DebianNYC BSP [1] this week-end, and would like to take a look
at any outstanding RC bug in debian-java maintained packages. Do you have any
suggestions? It seems there'll be a HPPA machine available at the BSP.
You can also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Great, I misunderstood the earlier comment about -g, so glad we're not
shipping with -g:none.
Niels, for your draft, do you want to include some comments about
"apt-get source" for people interested in getting the source for
debugging purposes? I'
Silly /me forgot to cc: Debian Java.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pablo Duboue
Date: Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Subject: RFS: jetty (updated package)
To: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Wed Dec 16 03:58, Pablo Duboue wrote:
>> What about having -dbg versions of the jars that include the source code and
>> debug information?
>
> Java policy says (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
>> What about having -dbg versions of the jars that include the source code and
>> debug information?
> What is "debug information" in the Java world ?
Actually, the .class files with debug info are so verbose that can be decompiled
close to the o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Marcus Better wrote:
> Onkar Shinde wrote:
>>> Would it be useful to have PACKAGE-dev packages for java containing the
>>> source code, so that I can refer to it when developing on top of a
>>> library?
>>
>> Ideall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Sadly it fails - the manifests are not included in the built jars
> (jetty.jar and jetty-utils.jar), I have not been able to determine why
> it is not included but I presume we need to pa
fixed 6.1.22
thanks
We don't ship the test WebApps enabled by default (from what I can
gather, it seems we don't ship them at all) and
this new version fixes the remaining XSS vulnerabilities (I double
checked the fix is in).
This bug will be closed when the new version gets uploaded.
--
To UN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
While looking into the right answer for Bug #554877
(/usr/share/jetty/webapps or /usr/share/java/webapps ?) I found the
posted
Java policy is really out of date:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/
It seems to focus on pre Op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
There was a posting [1] in the Eclipse linuxtools-dev mailing list
about External bundle-classpath entries that might be quite relevant
for us.
The idea would be to generate the bundle-classpath based on the
dependencies of the Debian packages. Ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
>> * According to #554874, the comment in jetty.default is wrong, it
>> should say "set it to 0.0.0.0 to listen to all
>> interfaces". I can look further into this and try to close that bug, too.
>
> That would be great yes.
OK, so I'll leave the E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have committed to the current trunk (r11288) for jetty in pkg-java
svn an upgrade to the latest version (6.1.22); plus
Niels' fix for #554877; plus the OSGi blundles MANIFIEST.MFs we need
for Eclipse (closes #558187).
The current package fetc
I see. I have no committers right (I'm not a DD), so I can produce a
patch against pkg-java SVN with these changes and send it to somebody
(you? debian-java?) for upload.
Alternatively, as I now realize a task labeled "upload" might be a bad
match without committer rights :) I can just take the ma
Hi,
I am very interested in getting a newer Eclipse into Debian. Any
chances we can use
http://wiki.debian.org/Eclipse
to coordinate efforts?
I maintain a set of Debian boxes (running stable) with eclipse for a
small development
team (12+ people).
We need Eclipse 3.4 and we're running it from
38 matches
Mail list logo
