Update of jmeter

2018-08-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, Is there anyone working on updating jmeter to latest version?I am trying to return to the packaging world after almost 8 years so my skills are rusty. If no one is working on this then I can give it a try. Regards, Onkar -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free softwa

Re: Transition from junit to junit4

2012-05-27 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > That's quite easy. If the package uses maven-debian-helper or > maven-repo-helper, then you need to use the following rule in > debian/maven.rules to use unconditionally Junit 4: > > junit junit jar s/.*/4.x/ * * > > Change the dependency fr

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> The issue is that it fails to clean properly - at least some (java)doc >> files are not cleaned, but also some non-text files (can't remember - I >> didn't pay too much attention to

Re: Transition from junit to junit4

2012-05-20 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Hi all, > > We have considerable number of packages (close to 200) in archive > which build depend on junit package (3.x version). Considering that > this version has been unsupported for long time by upstream authors, >

RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, I am looking for sponsorship for cdk 1.4.9-1. The packaging bits have been updated in pkg-java svn. I have also uploaded new source package on mentors.d.n http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cdk/cdk_1.4.9-1.dsc Please note that the upload will go through binary new as it adds a n

Re: RFS: jakarta-jmeter 2.5.1-1

2012-05-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking for sponsorship for jakarta-jmeter 2.5.1-1. This is the > last upstream release before they changed source name to apache-jmeter > (jakarta project is now retired). > > The packaging bits have

Transition from junit to junit4

2012-05-06 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, We have considerable number of packages (close to 200) in archive which build depend on junit package (3.x version). Considering that this version has been unsupported for long time by upstream authors, do you think it is time to transition packages to junit4 as and when possible? junit4 i

RFS: jakarta-jmeter 2.5.1-1

2012-05-05 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, I am looking for sponsorship for jakarta-jmeter 2.5.1-1. This is the last upstream release before they changed source name to apache-jmeter (jakarta project is now retired). The packaging bits have been committed in pkg-java svn. I have also uploaded the source package to mentors.d.n at f

Re: RFS: cdk 1:1.2.10-3 - [UPLOADED]

2012-05-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:09 PM, tony mancill wrote: > Uploaded. Thanks. I will start working on new upstream version soon. Cheers, Onkar -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software. Don't ask why - the reason is the same. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-req

Re: [warning] /usr/bin/fop: Unable to locate servlet-api in /usr/share/java

2012-05-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi there, > >  I am getting this annoying warning again: > > [warning] /usr/bin/fop: Unable to locate servlet-api in /usr/share/java > >  I used to fix it by installing libservlet2.4-java, now that we have > switch to libservlet2.5-java in

RFS: cdk 1:1.2.10-3

2012-05-01 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, I am looking for sponsorship for minor revision to cdk package. This is just a package refresh fixing few bitsize bugs before I work on new upstream version. The packaging bits have been committed to pkg-java svn. Latest changelog for reference. cdk (1:1.2.10-3) unstable; urgency=low *

How to handle license for packaging bits when none is specified

2012-05-01 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, I am working on refreshing cdk package. First I wish to fix some bugs and then I will be working on new upstream release. I wish to convert the d/copyright file to the newly approved copyright 1.0 (previously dep5) format. This package was initially created by 'Daniel Leidert (dale) ' as

Handling change of upstream source name

2012-04-25 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, I am working on packaging latest version of Jmeter. The software itself is not under Apache Jakarta project anymore. It has become top level project. So the source distribution is now renamed from jakarta-jmeter*.tgz to apache-jmeter*.tgz. This is the first time I am handling renaming of s

Re: RFS: jakarta-jmeter 2.4-3 - [UPLOADED]

2012-04-25 Thread Onkar Shinde
> Hi Onkar, > > Thank you for keeping this package updated. Thanks for upload. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cakbpjyiisf1zewvuq1om9nzt8ilzo8cuqavdbr

RFS: jakarta-jmeter 2.4-3

2012-04-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, I am requesting a sponsor for jakarta-jmeter revision 2.4-3. This includes mostly lintian fixes and few cleanups. The packaging changes have been commited in pkg-java svn. Why not latest upstream release: It changes name from jakarta-jmeter to jmeter and also has some build/runtime depend

RFS: jakarta-taglibs-standard 1.1.2-1

2011-06-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, I am looking for sponshorship for this package of JSTL. The motivation behind packging is to provide a standalone library which other packages can (build-)depend on. The corresponding ITP bug is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630112 The source package is uploaded to ment

Re: RFS: excalibur-logkit 2.0-5

2011-06-06 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:11 AM, tony mancill wrote: > On 06/03/2011 11:21 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> On 6/4/11, Vincent Fourmond wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, tony mancill wrote: >>>> Hi Onkar, >>>> >>>> I'll sponsor the up

Re: preferred location for jars vs. symlinks

2011-06-06 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM, tony mancill wrote: > I've noticed that some of the more recent CDBS packages are installing jars > under /usr/share/maven-repo/$class-hierarchy/$upstream-version/$library.jar, > and > then symlinks in /usr/share/java/ over to ../maven-repo/... > > By contrast, ja

Re: RFS: excalibur-logkit 2.0-5

2011-06-03 Thread Onkar Shinde
On 6/4/11, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, tony mancill wrote: >> Hi Onkar, >> >> I'll sponsor the upload, but 1 small thing with this update. >> >> The new package ships 2 separate JAR files in usr/share/java/ instead of >> the JAR and a symlink: >> >>excalibur-

RFS: cdk 1.2.10-1

2011-05-31 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, I am looking for sponsorship for cdk 1.2.10-1. This release fixes a buunch of bugs and lintian errors/warnings. Since this is a new upstream release I have uploaded source package to mentors.debian.net. Also all the packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/p

RFS: excalibur-logkit 2.0-5

2011-05-31 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, I am looking for sponsorship for excalibur-logkit 2.0-5. This revision does a lot of cleanup/refresh to the package. The packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn Latest changelog for reference. excalibur-logkit (2.0-5) unstable; urgency=low * Use libgeronimo-jms-1.1-spec-java instead of

Re: RFS: jug 2.0.0-2

2011-05-18 Thread Onkar Shinde
On 5/12/11, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Hi > > It appears to be missing a run-time dependency (or at least > Recommends/Suggests) on liblog4j1.2-java (possibly also missing a > classpath on it as well, did not check). Fixed in svn. > Could you please also add a javadoc package? Done. > That being

RFS: jug 2.0.0-2

2011-05-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
package to source format 3.0. -- Onkar Shinde Thu, 05 May 2011 09:41:30 +0530 -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software. Don't ask why - the reason is the same. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Re: RFS: jcharts 0.7.5-2

2011-05-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
On 5/6/11, Niels Thykier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2011-05-06 14:48, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >>> >>> On 2011-05-06 07:49, Onkar Shinde wrote: >>>> I am l

Re: Offline javadoc linking with maven-debian-helper/maven

2011-05-06 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:04 PM, James Page wrote: > Hi All > > After feedback from Niels on my first package for Debian I've been > trying to get a new maven based package (args4j - see [0]) to link its > javadoc against the default-jdk-doc API files provided > in /usr/share/doc/openjdk-6-doc/api.

Re: RFS: jcharts 0.7.5-2

2011-05-06 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2011-05-06 07:49, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> I am looking for sponsorship for jcharts 0.7.5-2. This will fix the >> bug 594270. This revision adds a new -d

RFS: jcharts 0.7.5-2

2011-05-05 Thread Onkar Shinde
ntation at appropriate place. * Convert package to source format 3.0. -- Onkar Shinde Fri, 06 May 2011 10:27:01 +0530 -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software. Don't ask why - the reason is the same. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.de

Re: RFS: ant (updated package to 1.8.2-1)

2011-05-05 Thread Onkar Shinde
Today I started working on merging Ubuntu changes to 'jug' to Debian package. Looks like I will have to put it on hold. I will continue the work when ant 1.8.2 lands in Debian so that Ubuntu can simply sync the updated package(s). Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.deb

RFS: cdk 1.2.8-1

2011-04-28 Thread Onkar Shinde
it useful. * debian/patches - 21_vecmath_lib_name.patch, 22_fix_build.patch - Updated to use wildcards for jar file names. Forwarded relevant bits upstream. * debian/watch - Improved regular expression to watch future stable versions. -- Onkar Shinde Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:4

Re: RFS: cdk 1.2.7-1

2011-04-18 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Egon Willighagen >> wrote: >>> Can you please file patch 21 and 22 'upstream'? Preferably as Git >>> p

Re: RFS: cdk 1.2.7-1

2011-04-18 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Egon Willighagen wrote: > Hi Onkar, > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> I need sponsorship for package cdk 1.2.7-1. The packaging bits are in >> pkg-java svn repository. > > Thanx for doing this! > >

RFS: cdk 1.2.7-1

2011-04-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
DME.source - Remove. Not needed with source format 3.0. * debian/watch - Keep track of stable versions only. -- Onkar Shinde Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:22:40 +0530 -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software. Don't ask why - the reason is the same. -- To UNSUBS

Re: RFS: jakarta-jmeter 2.4-1

2011-04-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
On 4/17/11, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> On 4/17/11, tony mancill wrote: >>> Hi Onkar, >>> >>> Thank you for packaging JMeter 2.4. I will sponsor the upload - the SVN >>> repo is >>> fine

Re: RFS: jakarta-jmeter 2.4-1

2011-04-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
On 4/17/11, tony mancill wrote: > Hi Onkar, > > Thank you for packaging JMeter 2.4. I will sponsor the upload - the SVN > repo is > fine. I just realized I forgot to remove quilt build-dep and patchsys-quilt.mk from rules file. Seeing that you have already uploaded package I will fix this in nex

RFS: jakarta-jmeter 2.4-1

2011-04-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
tch - Remove. Not needed anymore. * debian/source/format - Source format 3.0 (quilt). * debian/README.source - Not needed anymore with source format 3.0. -- Onkar Shinde Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:27:21 +0530 Onkar -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software. Do

Javadoc creation horribly slow on powerpc

2011-04-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
I am in process of updating jmeter to latest upstream version. While building the package using pbuilder the javadoc creation part of the build process was taking lot of time. In the end I kept the machine on overnight to finish the build process. This is not something I usually do. Javadoc creatio

Re: Apache Derby packaging ( Was Free package of Apache Derby?)

2011-03-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Zied ABID wrote: > >> I'll try do package it as soon as possible. > > I have some questions : > > - Trying to checkup derby dependencies, I didn't find 2 libs in Debian : > geronimo-spec-servlet-2.4, jakarta-oro-2.0.8. Some one is already > packaging them ? The pac

Re: Uploading fop 1.0 to experimental

2011-02-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello guys, > > Le samedi 17 juillet 2010 à 22:58 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : >> Dear package maintainer, >> >> I have uploaded fop 1.0 to experimental: >> >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fop/news/20100717T204721Z.html >> >> I did

Re: Ant can't find checkstyle

2010-08-26 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > The upstream build.xml can't find checkstyle.jar and tries to copy > convenience jar from the source tree into /usr/share/ant/lib/ > > How do I tell ant to use checkstyle from /usr/share/java/ ? > > ps. /me is clueless all things java BTW.

Re: Packaging JSPWiki (Re: [Recalled] RFS: libservlet2.4-java (supersedes libservlet2.3-java))

2010-07-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 2010-07-22 18:52, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> >>> [...] >> >> I deployed jspwiki at wo

Re: [Recalled] RFS: libservlet2.4-java (supersedes libservlet2.3-java)

2010-07-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > That would be ideal, but this is a package in poor shape in contrib. It > uses non of its Build-Depends (except ant and java), so you could just > trim out the B-Ds, however, I do not really want to do a "half-done" > upload of it. > > I have

Re: RFS: libservlet2.4-java (supersedes libservlet2.3-java)

2010-07-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
A quick comment. IIRC, there are API differences between servlet2.3 and servlet2.4. So 'Provides' doesn't make sense. Also there are no common files between two packages. So 'Replaces' doesn't make sense either. If there is just one (build)rdep of libservlet2.3-java then let's just migrate it to li

RFS: commons-jci 1.0-4

2010-06-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, I am looking for sponsorship for commons-jci 1.0-4. The changes have been committed to pkg-java svn. Latest changelog for reference. commons-jci (1.0-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Torsten Werner ] * Change maintainers into Maintainers. [ Onkar Shinde ] * Team upload. * Convert

libproxool-java packaging does not use upstream build.xml

2010-06-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, I am working on migrating (build)rdeps of libservlet2.4-java. While working on libproxool-java I observed that the packaging bits include a separate debian/build.xml file even though upstream ships one. There is no mention in debian/changelog as to why this file was created or why wasn't it re

Re: RFS: ow-util-ant-tasks 1.3.2-4

2010-06-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> Any sponsorer for this? > >  Yes, me ;-)... > >  It's on its way, please tag accordingly. Done. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ.

Please give-back tuxguitar on powerpc

2010-06-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, tuxguitar is in DEPWAIT state on powerpc for more than 5 months for some unknown reason. The build dependency has been fixed for long time and the package has build successfully on all architectures except hurd-i386. It will be great if build on powerpc can be retried. gb tuxguitar . powerp

Please give-back libitext-java on mips, sparc

2010-06-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hello, libitext-java failed to build on mips and sparc due to now fixed bug 580148. So the builds should succeed now. gb libitext-java . mips sparc Thanks, Onkar -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software. Don't ask why - the reason is the same. -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: RFS: ow-util-ant-tasks 1.3.2-4

2010-06-22 Thread Onkar Shinde
Any sponsorer for this? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilwaizo81ov4vpzzb3htwnmfv7yrjsjb5ux3...@mail.gmail.com

RFS: ow-util-ant-tasks 1.3.2-4

2010-06-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
ove API documentation to a separate package. * debian/libow-util-ant-tasks-java.dirs - Remove, not needed. * debian/libow-util-ant-tasks-java.doc-base - Rename to debian/libow-util-ant-tasks-java-doc.doc-base -- Onkar Shinde Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:19:38 +0530 Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: FTBFS of libitext-java on mips and sparc

2010-06-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi Onkar, > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> How can the build be retried on these architectures? > > please read the 'give-back' stuff on > <http://release.debian.org/wan

Re: Multiple versions of libasm*-java

2010-06-15 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote: > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan > wrote: > >> From my last build test neither libspring-2.5-java nor libspring-java (3.0) >> can be built with libasm3-java (fail to build with errors regarding >

Re: Multiple versions of libasm*-java

2010-06-15 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > From my last build test neither libspring-2.5-java nor libspring-java (3.0) > can be built with libasm3-java (fail to build with errors regarding > ClassVisitor interface, IIRC). > > Don't take it as a -1 against your proposal, but it's

FTBFS of libitext-java on mips and sparc

2010-06-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, The last upload of libitext-java FTBFS on mips and sparc. This upload pushed the -gcj package from 'Recommends' to 'Suggests'. Looking at the build logs I think the problem is (or was) with gcj package. But the build has never been tried since then on build servers. So it is not possible t

RFS: jardiff 0.2-3

2010-06-14 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi I am looking for sponsorship of jardiff 0.2-3. The packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. Latest changelog for reference. jardiff (0.2-3) unstable; urgency=low * Team upload. * asm2 -> asm3 migration * Convert to 3.0 source format. * Update standards version to 3.8.4. -- On

Re: RFS: libgstreamer-java

2010-05-25 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Samuel Lucas Vaz de Mello wrote: > I checked the official binary provided by upstream and it doesn't > contain a Class-Path in the manifest. > > Is the Class-Path in library jars (without a Main-Class) used by any > other tool beside javahelper? > > If the Class-P

Multiple versions of libasm*-java

2010-05-25 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, We currently have three versions of libasm*-java in repositories each one corresponding to specific major version form upstream. The packages are libasm-java, libasm2-java, libasm3-java. A quick look at upstream download page tells that only version 3.x is being maintained. Unless there ar

RFS: libitext-java 2.1.7-2

2010-05-18 Thread Onkar Shinde
I have not added any DEP-3 metadata to the patch. Latest changelog for reference: libitext-java (2.1.7-2) unstable; urgency=low [ Michael Koch ] * Removed Gerardo Curiel from Uploaders (Closes: #553081). [ Onkar Shinde ] * Move -gcj package from 'Recommends' to 'Suggest

ANT_OPTS is not correct variable to set build properties

2010-04-10 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi Varun, I just checked that you uploaded a new revision of oscache. You have added build properties for setting target JVM version 1.4. But the variable you used is wrong (contrary to what the variable name suggests). ANT_OPTS is used to pass arguments to JVM used by ant. The correct variable to

RFS: libcommons-modeler-java 2.0.1-5

2010-04-10 Thread Onkar Shinde
changed from svn and upload the package? Latest changelog for reference: libcommons-modeler-java (2.0.1-5) unstable; urgency=low [ Onkar Shinde ] * Change build dependencies to default-jdk. Set ant properties for target JVM version 1.4. Fixes FTBFS. (Closes: #576978) * Remove runtime JRE

RFS: libstruts1.2-java version 1.2.9-4

2010-04-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
) unstable; urgency=low [ Onkar Shinde ] * Build/runtime dependency libservlet2.3-java -> libservlet2.5-java. * Build dependency java-gcj-compat-dev -> default-jdk. * Remove runtime dependencies since the package is build with lowest target JVM version (1.3) * Convert patches to quilt

Re: Preparing uploads of antlr and liblogkit-java

2010-03-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for your work; is it correctly asserted that libfreemarker-java > is the only package that needs to be updated before we can get > liblogkit-java removed? >  If so, then I will not try to get liblogkit-java uploaded. Yes, libfr

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sun Mar 21 23:24, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> By the way the changes I did fixed only fixed mostly lintian >> errors/warnings. Should that be avoided when doing NMU? > > You should not be fixing lintian warnings  fo

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon >> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for >> java packaging. I have fi

RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
ove 'Apps' from 'Section' value. - Remove single white space at the end of file. - debian/copyright - Convert to UTF-8 encoding. -- Onkar Shinde Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:25:59 +0530 Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: RFS: avalon-framework 4.2.0-7

2010-03-20 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sat Mar 20 00:40, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> Please sponsor this small change to avalon-framework. I have committed >> packaging changes to pkg-java svn. > > I'll happily look at it tonight or tomorrow if yo

RFS: avalon-framework 4.2.0-7

2010-03-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
Please sponsor this small change to avalon-framework. I have committed packaging changes to pkg-java svn. Latest changelog for reference avalon-framework (4.2.0-7) unstable; urgency=low [ Onkar Shinde ] * liblogkit-java to libexcalibur-logkit-java transition. -- Debian Java Maintainers

Re: RFS: libcommons-logging-java 1.1.1-7

2010-03-19 Thread Onkar Shinde
Any takers for this sponsorship request? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/c9c316091003190338h49cd54d3sd1dffc6721629...@mail.gmail.com

Re: RFS: velocity 1.6.2-4

2010-03-18 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:01 AM, tony mancill wrote: > > Uploaded. Hi Tony, In case you haven't noticed, the upload was rejected because of size mismatch for .orig.tar.gz. Can you please check the problem and fix this? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org

RFS: libcommons-logging-java 1.1.1-7

2010-03-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
Please sponsor libcommons-logging-java 1.1.1-7. I have committed packaging bits in pkg-java svn. Latest changelog for reference. libcommons-logging-java (1.1.1-7) unstable; urgency=low [ Onkar Shinde ] * Replace build/runtime dep liblogkit-java with libexcalibur-logkit-java. Adjust

RFS: velocity 1.6.2-4

2010-03-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
Please sponsor velocity 1.6.2-4. I have committed changes in pkg-java svn. Latest changelog for reference. velocity (1.6.2-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Onkar Shinde ] * Replace build-dep openjdk-6-jdk with default-jdk. Adjust JAVA_HOME in rules file accordingly. * Replace openjdk-6-doc

Re: Preparing uploads of antlr and liblogkit-java

2010-03-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >   I am also keenly aware that liblogkit-java is obsolete (by upstream) > and I would love to have it RM'ed; however we still have packages > depending on it[3]. I am already working on migrating these packages to libexcalibur-logkit-java

Re: Bug#573581: newer upstream version available (4.8.1)

2010-03-12 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, David Paleino wrote: > On Friday 12 March 2010 17:33:11, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> There is already a junit4 package at version 4.8.1-1. Isn't that what >> you are looking for? > > Yes :) > > However, the package is at version 4.8.1,

Re: Recommends relation of libxxx-java-gcj packages

2010-02-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> doko had mentioned that -gcj packages offer performance improvements >> on architectures where JIT compiler is not present in JRE. > > But nobody is doing Java

RFS: cortado 0.5.2-1

2010-02-20 Thread Onkar Shinde
in libcortado-java package. * debian/cortado.postinst, debian/cortado.postrm - Rename old files so that they belong to cortado package only. -- Onkar Shinde Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:16:25 +0530 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Recommends relation of libxxx-java-gcj packages

2010-02-20 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Ludovic Claude wrote: > I never use gcj packages, I'm always unsure whether they will work > because dynamic class loading is used more and more in Java, and OpenJDK > is nowadays fast enough at startup to be convenient for command line > useage. So yes, I support

Re: Is JSTL available in repositories

2010-02-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On 11/02/2010 17:45, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Why doing some JSP development today I tried to locate JSTL in >> repositories. I couldn't find it on Ubuntu karmic installatio

Is JSTL available in repositories

2010-02-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi all, Why doing some JSP development today I tried to locate JSTL in repositories. I couldn't find it on Ubuntu karmic installation except as part of package tomcat6-examples. I haven't yet looked in my Debian installation. Does anyone know offhand if JSTL is packaged separately? Onkar --

Re: [RFH] compile JSP in jetty for SOLR1.4

2010-02-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to finish the packaging of SOLR1.4. I'm failing so far to get SOLR > running in JETTY. > There's a symling in /usr/share/jetty/webapps/solr, pointing to > /usr/share/solr. > > In /usr/share/solr are (beneth other files): > in

Re: RC bug suggestions for upcoming BSP?

2010-02-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > and there is a (probably) trivial bug: > > - #543103: maven-embedder: FTBFS: debian/lib${package}-java.poms doesn't exist I just attached a patch to this bug. It certainly wasn't trivial. :-) Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: Liferay packaging for Debian and Ubuntu

2010-02-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
I do not have complete knowledge of how liferay works even though I had explored it for a project about 2 years back. However, count me in for packaging the dependencies. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li

Re: RFS: cobertura

2010-01-27 Thread Onkar Shinde
I have one question about this package. Is there any particular reason why you created the package from scratch instead of basing it on the cobertura package from Ubuntu? Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li

RFS: java3d 1.5.2+dfsg-5

2010-01-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
I have committed the change in pkg-java svn. A source package is also uploaded to mentors.debian.net [1] java3d (1.5.2+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=low [ Sylvestre Ledru ] * Remove myself from the package [ Onkar Shinde ] * debian/control - Change build dependency default-jdk to

RFS: java-gnome 4.0.14-2

2010-01-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
: #564494) * debian/rules - Add verbosity to build log if architecture is hppa. This will help us track down cause of FTBFS on hppa. -- Onkar Shinde Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:19:07 +0530 [1] http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=java-gnome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: RFS: electric 8.10-1

2010-01-09 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sat Jan 09 18:15, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> I am looking for sponsorship for package electric version 8.10-1. The >> packaging bits are updated in pkg-java svn. I have also uploaded the >> source package to mentors.d.n

RFS: electric 8.10-1

2010-01-09 Thread Onkar Shinde
. * debian/README.source - Change text to the appropriate one for quilt. -- Onkar Shinde Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:26:04 +0530 [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/electric/electric_8.10-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

RFS: xml-commons-external 1.3.05

2009-12-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
to compile for target JVM 1.4. - Change folder for api docs. - Add get-orig-source target. * debian/watch - Keep watch on master distribution site. -- Onkar Shinde Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:28:17 +0530 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

RFS: java-gnome 4.0.14-1

2009-12-16 Thread Onkar Shinde
-sections if the architecture is hppa. Fixes FTBFS on hppa. (Closes: #558999) * debian/patches/01_take_screenshots.diff - Revert the commenting of the code that launches file chooser dialog. Not needed anymore as the glib bug that caused the FTBFS is fixed. -- Onkar Shinde Wed

Re: api docs, java source

2009-12-15 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed, that junit4-doc installs api docs into /usr/share/java/junit4 > while ant-doc installs them into /usr/share/doc/ant/api. Please file a bug. The docs should go to /usr/share/doc/junit4/api. > Maybe we should add a secti

Re: Bug#559967: FTBFS [hppa]: method openConnection() in the type URL is not...

2009-12-11 Thread Onkar Shinde
AFAIK, GCJ uses classpath library these days. The code from classpath is being merged in GCJ. And from the status of classpath [1] it is clear that java.net.URL.openConnection(java.net.Proxy) does not exist in classpath implementation. This can be easily tested. Try compiling following code with GC

Re: RFS: tijmp 0.8+dfsg-2

2009-12-09 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Onkar Shinde wrote: >> Latest changelog entry for references. This merges changes from Ubuntu. >> > > Done. Please tag it in the svn repo. Tagging done. Onkar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@li

Re: RFS: swt-gtk 3.5.1 (updated package)

2009-12-08 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Adrian Perez wrote: > Hello Mathias. > > Although is still an open discussion, we're making our best efforts to > not build SWT from eclipse at all, and just make it depend on the > swt-gtk generated packages. I am in agreement with Adrian here. There are at least

RFS: tijmp 0.8+dfsg-2

2009-12-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
Latest changelog entry for references. This merges changes from Ubuntu. tijmp (0.8+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low [ Onkar Shinde ] * debian/control - Replace build dependency openjdk-6-jdk with default-jdk. - Add runtime dependency default-jre | java2-runtime. * debian/rules

State of openjdk on hppa

2009-12-07 Thread Onkar Shinde
Hi, java3d currently fails to build on hppa because it uses some sun specific APIs and default-jdk is GCJ on hppa. A solution for this could be to use openjdk-6-jdk build-dep instead of default-jdk. But the problem is that there are no openjdk-* packages on hppa. Does anyone know if there is any

Re: RFS: libxmlenc-java

2009-12-04 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: >> Is there any particular reason why the packaging bits are not >> maintained in the Debian infrastructure? [1] > Yes. I'm not a DD and can not setup a GIT repository on git.debian.org > > But I'd love, if someone would pull it to git.d.o You do

Re: RFS: libxmlenc-java

2009-12-04 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > The library is a dependency of Hadoop, see Hadoop RFP[1] and Ubuntu Infos on > Hadoop packaging[2]. > > Please be so kind to have a look at > > http://github.com/thkoch2001/pkg-debian-libxmlenc-java > > The package builds, is lintian clean and i

Re: RFS: jug 2.0.0-1

2009-11-26 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Onkar Shinde wrote: >> >> The release-notes/CREDITS and release-notes/README files mention that >> 'D.J Hagberg' contributed native code for Mac OS X and rest of native >> code was contributed by &#

Re: RFS: jug 2.0.0-1

2009-11-26 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Onkar Shinde wrote: >> I am looking for sponsorship of jug 2.0.0-1. This closes ITP 557835. >> This package is mainly a port of the package from Ubuntu and it is one >> of the essential (build)dependency of cruiseco

RFS: jug 2.0.0-1

2009-11-25 Thread Onkar Shinde
I am looking for sponsorship of jug 2.0.0-1. This closes ITP 557835. This package is mainly a port of the package from Ubuntu and it is one of the essential (build)dependency of cruisecontrol. I request that the orig.tar.gz I uploaded to mentors.d.n be used so that the package can then be synced to

Re: commons-collections packages

2009-11-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:52:18 +0530, Onkar Shinde > wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Emmanuel Bourg > wrote: >>> I'm not sure it is fully backward compatible. There was a binary

Re: Bug#557685: libspring-web-2.5-java: Add dependencies to classpath

2009-11-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:09:13 +0530, Onkar Shinde > wrote: > > Hi Onkar, > >> Please add the dependencies of this package to the classpath so that >> (build)rdepends don't have to specifical

  1   2   3   >