Hi,
On Mon, 2003-05-12 at 02:33, Tom Badran wrote:
> I have an application that uses a borderlayout, where the BorderLayout.CENTER
> component is a Panel reference, to a class instance that is a subclass of
> Panel. The initial add is fine, and it all works well, however if i do a
> remove(Pane
Hi again,
after more suggestions from the list the classloader works as follows:
Typical invocation:
deb-java package class
- Reads a file with the name of the package (which is to provided by the
package) under /usr/share/debian-classloader/
- Loads classpath and dependency information from the
On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 00:17, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 07:25:30PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> > After suggestions from Ola I extended the classloaded and it now works with
> > package dependencies.
> >
> > How it works:
>
After suggestions from Ola I extended the classloaded and it now works with
package dependencies.
How it works:
Every package has a file in /etc/debian-classloader/ with the following format:
classpath = /usr/share/java/x.jar ...
depends = package1 package2
A class is started with: deb-
On Sun, 2003-04-20 at 09:37, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > It is arbitrary (the ordering depends on the order java.Files.getFiles()
> > returns filenames. That is why classes should have a unique name (this
> > is the case for most packages, if not all) and it has the same effect as
> > adding everythin
ure java and javac are in your PATH, or use alternatives.
Nicos
--
Nicos Panayides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> It works here. Try editing the shell script and replace
> java -Djava.system.class.loader=DebianClassLoader "$@"
> with: java DebianClassLoader "$@"
>
> The problem might be that the particular property was introduced in later
> versions. I am using 1.4.1
I created a fixed package. It w
On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 09:15, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 12:40, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> sounds good
>
> What happens if a class is in multiple jar files? which will be used?
It is arbitrary (the ordering depends on the orde
On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 09:14, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Great idea but it does not work for me...
>
> ant1.5.1-1, j2sdk1.3 - 1.3.1.02b-2 - Blackdown Java(TM) 2 SDK,
> Standard Edition and debian-classloader are installed.
>
> $ deb-java org.apache.tools.ant.Main
> Exception in thread "main" java.lan
Hi all,
I figured a way to make the job of java packaging a bit easier. The
current approach is to create wrapper scripts that define the classpath
and call java with the name of class containing the main.
The problem is with package A depending on libraries from package B
which in turns depends o
There are more than one ways to do this. My suggestion is to have two
packages:
cdk-java (command line)
cdk-gui-java (swing stuff)
the command line package needs to be compilable with a free javac (gij,
jikes etc). As for the binary I don't think it provides any real benefit
besides a slightly re
After the whole discussion whether the package can be packaged or not
let me say this. Even if it is packaged most people will not use it
simply because it is so damn slow. I try almost every Forte/Netbeans
release it comes out hoping that it can run at a decent speed on my
p3/500. So far it is so
After the whole discussion whether the package can be packaged or not
let me say this. Even if it is packaged most people will not use it
simply because it is so damn slow. I try almost every Forte/Netbeans
release it comes out hoping that it can run at a decent speed on my
p3/500. So far it is so
ian officially but hopefully someday there
will be, and not handling specification dependencies will cause some
headaches to the users.
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 06:45, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
>
> > I was wondering now that yo
ian officially but hopefully someday there
will be, and not handling specification dependencies will cause some
headaches to the users.
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 06:45, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
>
> > I was wondering now that yo
I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
"packages being worked on" list that openoffice debs are being prepared.
I am not sure how accurate this list is but openoffice is on. As far as
i know both openoffice and sun's jdk have the same licenses. How come
sun's jdk (or
I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
"packages being worked on" list that openoffice debs are being prepared.
I am not sure how accurate this list is but openoffice is on. As far as
i know both openoffice and sun's jdk have the same licenses. How come
sun's jdk (or
17 matches
Mail list logo
