Re: [JPackage-admin] maven-1.0-0.rc1.jpp ready

2004-03-30 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
ages to use whatever resolution mechanism we agree on later. Of course this will be less painful if someone with deep maven knowledge (ie not me) checks the competing proposals for maven compatibility now. Short-term maven packages will remain the oddball they are now. Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot

Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Java Linux common packaging

2004-03-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
27;s done and the behaviour is well defined. Personally I'd rather write xpath queries that obviously do exactly what we want than checking that a shell implementation won't break on a misplaced space, space/tab replacement or UTF-8 string. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Desc

Re: Java Linux common packaging

2004-03-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le sam, 27/03/2004 Ã 16:23 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a Ãcrit : > I've added a few pages in the wiki over the last few days. > > (http://java.debian.net/index.php/CommonJavaPackaging) BTW if someone wants to play with xml dependency descriptors like the ones declared in : http://j

Java Linux common packaging

2004-03-27 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
I've added a few pages in the wiki over the last few days. (http://java.debian.net/index.php/CommonJavaPackaging) Please comment -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-04 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
text-ext, you're explicitely requesting the out- of-jvm implementation (same with jsse/jsse-ext and all the -ext packages). We could use more virtuals, though but at some points symlinks are just too messy and we'll have to convert to flat-files. The symlinks were my idea and they

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-02 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
ee with - care to add them to the writeup ? And yes we are redefining traditional C/C++/Perl/Python rules, but with Java people deciding to ignore the past (it's system specific) and re- enacting past errors (like Maven) I'm afraid we have little choice. -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Re: upstream guidelines for easy packaging (was: JPackages and ObjectWeb)

2004-02-02 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lun, 02/02/2004 Ã 12:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a Ãcrit : > Hallo, > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > I've added a few more points that should answer your questions. Please > > tell me if it is so (and other JPP/Debian/Gentoo... folks please check > > if i

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-02 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le lun, 02/02/2004 Ã 10:26 +0100, Eric Bruneton a Ãcrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > I'm done with this. The result is available at: > > > > http://java.debian.net/index.php/What%20is%20required%20from%20upst > >ream > Thanks for these guidelines. I have a f

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 12:51 -0500, David Walluck a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > >I'm done with this. The result is available at: > It says final version is forthcoming. I was afraid to make edits just > yet. Please do so now - I may fix a typo or two, but I finis

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 18:25 +0100, Jan Schulz a écrit : > Hallo Nicolas, > > * Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >I'm done with this. The result is available at: > >I'm rather proud of myself since I merged the full JPP document, my > >mail, added a few ideas and co

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 16:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 16:15 +0100, Jan Schulz a écrit : > > Hallo Nicolas, > > > > * Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > >face the same problems and wish for more or less the same things : > > [...] > &

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le dim, 01/02/2004 à 16:15 +0100, Jan Schulz a écrit : > Hallo Nicolas, > > * Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >face the same problems and wish for more or less the same things : > [...] > > Would you mind adding that to the wiki? Seems like a nice thing to > have ther

Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb]

2004-02-01 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
-line we'll point you to as soon a our web site is back up again. Anyway, just follow these simple guidelines for the time being and every single java linux packager will praise your name daily;) Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Re: Common packaging: Wiki Site created

2004-01-13 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
gether at the end of last year. (in particular I tried to answer the questions that seemed natural to you from your Debian viewpoint) That will be all for today - my style is debilegenerating faast. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=

Re: build .deb packages on jpackage, too ?

2003-06-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le sam 07/06/2003 à 16:37, Jens Skripczynski a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot: > > Le sam 07/06/2003 à 14:21, Jens Skripczynski a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > I wanted to ask, if the jpackage site would host debian packages as well, > > > as the rpm pac

Re: build .deb packages on jpackage, too ?

2003-06-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
package dependencies could be shared. Unfortunately the current project members have their hands full and unless a few debian users step in (just like we've got good RH/Mdk coverage via RH/Mdk contributors) it won't be done. [ CCing to debian-java ] Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.

Re: build .deb packages on jpackage, too ?

2003-06-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le sam 07/06/2003 à 16:37, Jens Skripczynski a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot: > > Le sam 07/06/2003 à 14:21, Jens Skripczynski a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > I wanted to ask, if the jpackage site would host debian packages as well, > > > as the rpm pac

Re: build .deb packages on jpackage, too ?

2003-06-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
package dependencies could be shared. Unfortunately the current project members have their hands full and unless a few debian users step in (just like we've got good RH/Mdk coverage via RH/Mdk contributors) it won't be done. [ CCing to debian-java ] Cheers, -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.

Re: Java dependency handling on a jpackage 1.5 rpm system

2003-05-17 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Same document with some more examples and a few fixes. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>JPackage java infrastructure design and packaging policyJPackage java infrastructure design and packagi

Java dependency handling on a jpackage 1.5 rpm system

2003-05-17 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
o far from non-rpm linux systems, I've included debian-java in CCs. It's been a long time since we synced with them. Anyway I know at least a few people want this since they've asked me about the new scripts (repeatedly:). Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DT

Re: [JPackage-devel] FW: jakarta ant 1.4.1/1.5 ant script

2002-05-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mar 07/05/2002 à 12:26, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > On 06 May 2002, Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * moved user ant conf from ~/.antrc to ~/.ant/etc/ant.conf > > -1 > > Add ~/.ant/etc/conf would be OK, but not completely replacing it.

Re: [JPackage-devel] FW: jakarta ant 1.4.1/1.5 ant script

2002-05-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le mar 07/05/2002 à 12:26, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > On 06 May 2002, Nicolas Mailhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * moved user ant conf from ~/.antrc to ~/.ant/etc/ant.conf > > -1 > > Add ~/.ant/etc/conf would be OK, but not completely replacing it.