Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-07-08 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Monday 08 July 2002 4:50 pm, Rick Lutowski wrote: > Nicolai P Guba wrote: > > On Monday 08 July 2002 12:36 am, Adam Heath wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote: > > > > Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;) > > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-07-08 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Monday 08 July 2002 4:50 pm, Rick Lutowski wrote: > Nicolai P Guba wrote: > > On Monday 08 July 2002 12:36 am, Adam Heath wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote: > > > > Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;) > > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-07-08 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Monday 08 July 2002 12:36 am, Adam Heath wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote: > > Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;) > > Nah, need to get rid of sun. Both suck. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-07-08 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Monday 08 July 2002 12:36 am, Adam Heath wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote: > > Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;) > > Nah, need to get rid of sun. Both suck. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-07-03 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 9:26 pm, Adam Heath wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote: > > The entire JBoss setup is not very graceful indeed. We have been using > > it as a service platform for over 16 months now and are thinking of > > replacing it with ou

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-07-03 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Wednesday 03 July 2002 9:26 pm, Adam Heath wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote: > > The entire JBoss setup is not very graceful indeed. We have been using > > it as a service platform for over 16 months now and are thinking of > > replacing it with ou

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-07-03 Thread Nicolai P Guba
> I've seen some of the JBoss resistance to changing things for debian, but > I think thing can be progressed there step by step. The entire JBoss setup is not very graceful indeed. We have been using it as a service platform for over 16 months now and are thinking of replacing it with our own

Re: [ANNOUNCE] JBoss 2.4.7 debs for public consumption

2002-07-03 Thread Nicolai P Guba
> I've seen some of the JBoss resistance to changing things for debian, but > I think thing can be progressed there step by step. The entire JBoss setup is not very graceful indeed. We have been using it as a service platform for over 16 months now and are thinking of replacing it with our ow

Re: Which JSP Engine

2002-06-05 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 6:23 am, Bill Wohler wrote: >   Me? I develop on Tomcat. We've hit a couple of things that Tomcat >   handled that Resin did not (I haven't checked the specs to see if >   Tomcat was liberal or Resin was buggy). Tomcat puts out better errors >   in the log file. Debugging

Re: Which JSP Engine

2002-06-05 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Wednesday 05 June 2002 6:23 am, Bill Wohler wrote: >   Me? I develop on Tomcat. We've hit a couple of things that Tomcat >   handled that Resin did not (I haven't checked the specs to see if >   Tomcat was liberal or Resin was buggy). Tomcat puts out better errors >   in the log file. Debugging

Re: Summary: Best way to install JDK 1.4 on woody?

2002-05-23 Thread Nicolai P Guba
> JDK1.4, be it by Blackdown or by Javasoft. Much better > would be a free Java, so that it could go in main. Bye! There are some efforts, but they are always lagging behind the SUN releases. Some never made the jump to java2. I hear rumors that JDK1.5 might be free I'm not holding my b

Re: Summary: Best way to install JDK 1.4 on woody?

2002-05-23 Thread Nicolai P Guba
> JDK1.4, be it by Blackdown or by Javasoft. Much better > would be a free Java, so that it could go in main. Bye! There are some efforts, but they are always lagging behind the SUN releases. Some never made the jump to java2. I hear rumors that JDK1.5 might be free I'm not holding my

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-08 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Wednesday 08 May 2002 1:37 pm, Alex Lau wrote: > I don't think the problem is the speed rather the ram problem... It run > fine in my Celeon 400 > but I 1G of ram. It run ok. Editing the ide.conf to allow for more ram for the vm makes a lot of sense. Pity that Sun has such a grip on Java. Tr

Re: JTRIX

2002-04-04 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:24 pm, Franck Routier wrote: > That's what I understood as well, but what I don't get is how this compares > to other hype technologies like Corba, J2EE, .Net, dotgnu, ... > > Should it be considered similar or related, or is it something different, > or even complementa

Re: JTRIX

2002-04-04 Thread Nicolai P Guba
On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:24 pm, Franck Routier wrote: > That's what I understood as well, but what I don't get is how this compares > to other hype technologies like Corba, J2EE, .Net, dotgnu, ... > > Should it be considered similar or related, or is it something different, > or even complement