Re: Sad news for Kaffe.

2004-03-05 Thread Nic Ferrier
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear self-rightous and non-appreciative Java Debian list, > ... You should all start using lisp. Nic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: java on ppc

2003-04-24 Thread Nic Ferrier
florian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 13:00, Nic Ferrier wrote: > > florian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > hi! > > > > > > does anybody here do java development under ppc? > > > > > > i t

Re: java on ppc

2003-04-24 Thread Nic Ferrier
florian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi! > > does anybody here do java development under ppc? > > i tried the ibm jdk/jre, but its kinda buggy. i get > alot of signal 11, crashing etc.. > > is the free implementation ready for daily use > yet? will it work well with ppc? I do all my java deve

Re: JAXP-compliant XSLT processor

2003-03-20 Thread Nic Ferrier
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > _______ > / Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | I'd be really happy for someone to make a debian package... we're > | going to make a new release of G

Re: JAXP-compliant XSLT processor

2003-03-20 Thread Nic Ferrier
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ___ > / Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | LibxmlJ and other processors don't seem to be in the archive. Is > | anyone here interested in packaging this? Or possibly help getting > | the e

Re: JAXP-compliant XSLT processor

2003-03-20 Thread Nic Ferrier
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > _______ > / Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | I'd be really happy for someone to make a debian package... we're > | going to make a new release of G

Re: JAXP-compliant XSLT processor

2003-03-20 Thread Nic Ferrier
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ___ > / Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | LibxmlJ and other processors don't seem to be in the archive. Is > | anyone here interested in packaging this? Or possibly help getting > | the e

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Nic Ferrier
o to contrib. There are many other free JVMs now: ORP, KissMe, etc... The Classpath page at GNU references them: http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath Nic Ferrier GNU ClasspathX maintainer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java Policy.

2002-05-12 Thread Nic Ferrier
o to contrib. There are many other free JVMs now: ORP, KissMe, etc... The Classpath page at GNU references them: http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath Nic Ferrier GNU ClasspathX maintainer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: which JSP engine

2002-04-18 Thread Nic Ferrier
web server? You could also use GNU-Paperclips and GNUJSP (but Paperclips is still in beta). I would advise that you not use JServ. It's very old now and not likely to implement what your customer might expect from a JSP engine. Either of the other two would be ok. Nic Ferrier GNU-Papercl

Re: which JSP engine

2002-04-18 Thread Nic Ferrier
n my web server? You could also use GNU-Paperclips and GNUJSP (but Paperclips is still in beta). I would advise that you not use JServ. It's very old now and not likely to implement what your customer might expect from a JSP engine. Either of the other two would be ok. Nic Ferrier GNU-

Re: java Makefile

2001-06-17 Thread Nic Ferrier
nding on the part of the developer about what has changed. Nic Ferrier # JCD Makefile # (c) Nic Ferrier - Tapsell-Ferrier Limited 2001 # # You are free to redistribute this file. NO WARRANTY or fitness # for purpose is implied by this notice. # # What goes on here? # The SOURCEFILES should be a

Re: java Makefile

2001-06-17 Thread Nic Ferrier
nding on the part of the developer about what has changed. Nic Ferrier # JCD Makefile # (c) Nic Ferrier - Tapsell-Ferrier Limited 2001 # # You are free to redistribute this file. NO WARRANTY or fitness # for purpose is implied by this notice. # # What goes on here? # The SOURCEFILES should be a

Re: Using org.apache.service to create Java Daemons

2001-01-19 Thread Nic Ferrier
in Thread. I was hoping that the tomcat code would >be a good implementation of 1 that I didn't have to >write all of. C program to run JVM as a daemon here: http://www.gnu.org/software/java/arc/djinn-1.1.tar.gz Nic Ferrier

Re: Using org.apache.service to create Java Daemons

2001-01-19 Thread Nic Ferrier
in Thread. I was hoping that the tomcat code would >be a good implementation of 1 that I didn't have to >write all of. C program to run JVM as a daemon here: http://www.gnu.org/software/java/arc/djinn-1.1.tar.gz Nic Ferrier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine

2001-01-14 Thread Nic Ferrier
>>> Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14-Jan-01 9:50:49 PM >>> >Cocoon needs to me aware of the actual >serlvet engine to be able to do an automatic >setup and can't just depend on java-servlet-engine. >This would require a common setup tool for all >servlet engines Well... all 2.2 onwards comp

Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine

2001-01-14 Thread Nic Ferrier
>>> Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14-Jan-01 9:50:49 PM >>> >Cocoon needs to me aware of the actual >serlvet engine to be able to do an automatic >setup and can't just depend on java-servlet-engine. >This would require a common setup tool for all >servlet engines Well... all 2.2 onwards com

Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine

2000-12-17 Thread Nic Ferrier
Paperclips, the FSF's servlet engine) require GNUJSP to provide JSP services. I will be packaging GNU-Paperclips for Debian once we are API 2.3 compliant. I hope that Debian will provide it in the main release when I have done so. Nic Ferrier

Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine

2000-12-17 Thread Nic Ferrier
ly GNU-Paperclips, the FSF's servlet engine) require GNUJSP to provide JSP services. I will be packaging GNU-Paperclips for Debian once we are API 2.3 compliant. I hope that Debian will provide it in the main release when I have done so. Nic Ferrier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine

2000-12-16 Thread Nic Ferrier
e are now quite a few servlet dependant tools out there. I would like to see this done as well, for 2 reasons: 1. I'm the architect of the GNU-Paperclips servlet container which I would like to get into Debian for the next release 2. I'm involved in several projects that will utilise servlet containers and I'd like those to be Debianized too. Nic Ferrier

Re: RFC: provides: java-servlet-engine

2000-12-16 Thread Nic Ferrier
e are now quite a few servlet dependant tools out there. I would like to see this done as well, for 2 reasons: 1. I'm the architect of the GNU-Paperclips servlet container which I would like to get into Debian for the next release 2. I'm involved in several projects that will utili

Re: packaging jars vs. classes

2000-11-09 Thread Nic Ferrier
>>> Aaron Brashears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09-Nov-00 6:17:55 PM >>> >Though not yet in main, Stefan Gybas packaged >Tomcat 3.2b6 recently for Debian. I've given it some simple >tests, and it seems to work. He decided to make >/usr/share/java/webapps the place to dump war >files. The war files are

Re: packaging jars vs. classes

2000-11-09 Thread Nic Ferrier
>>> Aaron Brashears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09-Nov-00 6:17:55 PM >>> >Though not yet in main, Stefan Gybas packaged >Tomcat 3.2b6 recently for Debian. I've given it some simple >tests, and it seems to work. He decided to make >/usr/share/java/webapps the place to dump war >files. The war files are

Re: packaging jars vs. classes

2000-11-09 Thread Nic Ferrier
>>> "Joe Emenaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09-Nov-00 12:55:05 AM >>> >.war files aren't searched directly. I know a bit about this - I'm on the Sun Servlet standardizing committee. >They're just archives used for deploying a web application. >If I create a new directory for a new webapp and drop

Re: packaging jars vs. classes

2000-11-09 Thread Nic Ferrier
>>> "Joe Emenaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09-Nov-00 12:55:05 AM >>> >.war files aren't searched directly. I know a bit about this - I'm on the Sun Servlet standardizing committee. >They're just archives used for deploying a web application. >If I create a new directory for a new webapp and drop

Re: packaging jars vs. classes

2000-11-08 Thread Nic Ferrier
to replace existing VM class loaders (I'm not sure how well that would fit with gcj for example) but it would be possible in traditional VMs. The package would have to move and rename the existing VMs System Class Loader and call that to deal with stuff on the boot classpath and extension class

Re: packaging jars vs. classes

2000-11-08 Thread Nic Ferrier
to replace existing VM class loaders (I'm not sure how well that would fit with gcj for example) but it would be possible in traditional VMs. The package would have to move and rename the existing VMs System Class Loader and call that to deal with stuff on the boot classpath and extension cl