> you encourage. Java must run everywhere, else we have no
> argument against 100% Microsoft solutions.
>
> What is so bad about Java and Flash anyway?
They're not bad per se, but IME they're mostly good for complementary
stuff and sites which require them are simply broken IM
> you encourage. Java must run everywhere, else we have no
> argument against 100% Microsoft solutions.
>
> What is so bad about Java and Flash anyway?
They're not bad per se, but IME they're mostly good for complementary
stuff and sites which require them are simply broken IM
2 matches
Mail list logo
