Hi,
Upstream have released 0.3.15, which fixes this bug. I’m still away (and will
be for a while yet); would one of the java team mind uploading 0.3.15, please?
Hopefully it’ll just drop in on top of the existing packaging…
Thanks,
Matthew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists
Hi,
Keen readers of the Debconf programme will notice that there's a java
packaging Bof on Monday morning. I wrote some text when I submitted the
suggestion, but I don't think we need feel overly constrained by it.
As well as dependency/maven fun and games (per blurb), it would seem
sensible to h
Stephen Nelson writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libxmltooling-java"
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> - libxmltooling-java - XMLTooling-J
> - libxmltooling-java-doc - Documentation for XMLTooling-J
>
> The upload is to fix an RC bug #752963 where the package FTBFS
Hi,
Firstly, thanks for fixing this bug; I obviously missed it arriving somehow.
On 30/07/14 21:21, Stephen Nelson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 30/07/2014 19:04, Stephen Nelson wrote:
Usually, it is better to send the patch in the bug itself and if there
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Reason: POM 'org.richfaces:richfaces-bom' not found in repository: System
> > is offline.
> >
> > org.richfaces:richfaces-bom:pom:debian
>
> I think you reached the point of yak-shaving: where you
> have to package th
Hi,
Is there likely to be any interest in a javay bof at Debconf?
I see the GSOC project looking at recursive auto-building of
maven-packaged software, and I think that maven has perhaps made it
harder to get larger java packages into Debian: there's a whole
infrastructure of "download dependenci
Daniel Pocock writes:
> On 09/06/14 12:54, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Would there be value in checking of dependencies that are already
> > packages in Debian, and/or aiming to include more of the
> > more-commonly-used java libs in the distribution?
> >
> If Debia
Daniel Pocock writes:
> On 07/06/14 09:33, Andrew Schurman wrote:
> > I recall reading that packaging a maven project for debian requires
> > maven to be in offline mode during the build. I can try to emulate
> > that by dumping artifacts into a built artifact repository and use
> > that as the o
Hi,
On 14/04/14 16:44, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/04/2014 15:51, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/debian/source/patch-header
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +Subject: Collected Debian patches for libshib-common-java
>> +Author: Matthew Vern
Matthew Vernon writes:
> I've uploaded libowasp-antisamy-java and libowasp-esapi-java to
> experimental, including their relevant -doc packages. Unless someone
> tells me I shouldn't, I'll create git repos for them under pkg-java at
> some point in the vaguely-near
Hi,
Emmanuel Bourg writes:
> > binary:libnot-yet-commons-ssl-java is NEW.
> > binary:libnot-yet-commons-ssl-java-doc is NEW.
> > source:not-yet-commons-ssl is NEW.
>
> Thank you for packaging this library. Don't forget to commit the source
> on alioth please. There is a setup script on alioth i
Hi,
Markus Koschany writes:
> If you really intend to maintain all of them for the foreseeable future,
> I would start with
>
> libnot-yet-commons-ssl-java
> libowasp-antisamy-java
> libowasp-esapi-java
> libvt-ldap-java
>
> and prepare them for experimental not unstable. However libraries sho
Miguel Landaeta writes:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Has anyone made any progress on this? I'd rather not have another large
> > java package to try and build added onto my TODO list, but it looks like
> > there's no way I can p
Hi,
I was looking at libsvnkit-java, as I have something that depends upon
it, so I need maven artifacts in libsvnkit-java so that my maven-based
project will build (I assume there's no handy work-around for this?). I
couldn't get it to build, which led me to bug #735763, which has a note
from ton
Emmanuel Bourg writes:
> Le 28/02/2014 13:18, Matthew Vernon a ecrit :
>
> > This was all correct. However, ant-contrib's POM depends on version
> > "debian" of commons-httpclient, which is wrong.
>
> Well spotted. Can you file a bug for the ant package
Hi again,
> Executive summary: mh_make should be trying to find
> commons-httpclient:commons-httpclient:jar:3.x, but is actually failing
> to find commons-httpclient:commons-httpclient:jar:debian
This was a bore to track down, but I got there. The answer is
two-fold:
i) maven lies about its depe
Andrew Otto writes:
> uh huh. :p Here is a WIP list of dependencies that are not already packaged
> for debian:
> https://gist.github.com/ottomata/9006927#file-archiva-dependencies-no-deb-packages
Some of these are available in Debian, though you have to look a
bit. For example, there are seve
Hi,
I'm still working on the dependencies for the Shibboleth IdP. I'm not
there yet (see recent emails about problems with maven), as I can't
persuade mh_make to work on libshib-common-java, but I have built a
number of packages, all of which are availble for now from
http://www.chiark.greenend.o
Hi,
Sorry, I'm still trying to build java packages for Debian! mh_make is
failing because it's mangling a dependency specified in the POM of a
package that the thing I'm trying to build is depending on (if you see
what I mean!).
Executive summary: mh_make should be trying to find
commons-httpclie
Hi,
I think that the pom shipped with ant-contrib is broken such that
mh_make will be unhappy when trying to build anything that depends upon it.
mh_make is bombing out thus:
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
[INFO] Bu
Hi,
> Thank you. Here are my observations:
> - libxmltooling-java is missing a build dependency on
> libjcip-annotations-java
Fixed.
> - libshib-parent-project2-java seems to be a snapshot from the trunk, is
> it really the version 1? If so it should install a version '1' and a
> version 'debian
On 14/02/14 19:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/02/2014 18:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~matthewv/javadebs/
> - libshib-parent-project2-java seems to be a snapshot from the trunk, is
> it really the version 1? If so it should install a ve
On 17/02/14 11:27, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14/02/14 19:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 14/02/2014 18:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
>
> Thanks for your comments. Very helpful!
>
>>> * libjcip-annotations-java-doc_20060626-3.1 - possible NMU to add
Hi,
On 14/02/14 19:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/02/2014 18:37, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
Thanks for your comments. Very helpful!
>> * libjcip-annotations-java-doc_20060626-3.1 - possible NMU to add maven
>> support to this package
>
> No need to do a NMU. You can up
Hi,
I've been doing a bit more work on this, and have different problems
now. I've put a whole pile of source and binary packages, and build logs
here:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~matthewv/javadebs/
The thing I'm trying to get right is libxmltooling-java [0]. The
problems I'm having with
On 12/02/14 22:43, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Compilation (via debuild) is now failing despite my having the correct
> packages:
>
> /home/mcv21/packages/libxmltooling-java/src/main/java/org/opensaml/xml/validation/AbstractValidatingXMLObject.java:[26,16]
> package org
Hi,
On 12/02/14 16:45, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
maven.compiler.source=1.5
maven.compiler.target=1.5
Spot on again, many thanks. I'm making (slow) progress!
Compilation (via debuild) is now failing despite my having the correct
packages:
/home/mcv21/packages/libxmltooling-java/src/m
Hi,
> You have to add a Maven rule in debian/maven.rules that rewrites the
> version of junit to '4.x' instead of 'debian':
Thanks, that was just the ticket. My next issue is how to specify in
maven.properties (or somewhere else?) that I want to compile with a
newer JDK version - currently maven
Hi,
I'm trying to package some java libraries for Debian (actually, I want
to produce a shibboleth IdP package, but it depends on some java
libraries that aren't in Debian).
I run it thus:
mh_make -shttps://svn.shibboleth.net/java-xmltooling/branches/REL_1
java-xmltooling -plibxmltooling-java
s
29 matches
Mail list logo
