Hi Andreas!
Andreas Tille wrote:
Does anybody honestly think that the vanished author who does not seem
to care for his very old code at all will mind about our perfectly
theoretical discussion?
Very, very likely he won't. But if the fact that the copyright owner
won't sue us is the relevant
Hi Thorsten!
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Can you, or anyone really, give some detail on what exactly is the
problem here (which files)?
I'm sorry for not having been more specific from the beginning. Given
that you had brought up the interface aspect yourself, I thought we were
on the same page.
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
the interface issue again. Because no matter how well we replace the
implementation, if we can't use the interfaces or have to "cripple" them, we
don't have a fix.
We can just reimplement them, since we
Hi Thorsten!
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
So is it the official Debian position
There cannot be an official Debian position on this,
either it’s so or not, based on law ;-)
Yes, it's the law, but I doubt that the law mentions Java inter
4 matches
Mail list logo
