Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Thu, 05 May 2005 10:30:50 -0400,
> Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>As of the N20050505 nightly builds, the Eclipse 3.1 JDT for Linux PPC
>>>GTK is now available for download. Until now, it had to be built from
>>>source and was quite problematic.
>
>
>
Joerg Wendland wrote:
Barry Hawkins, on 2004-11-17, 09:29, you wrote:
That's what I have been doing, I just don't know if that's how we want
the Eclipse 3 package to work. Is that what other Java applications
that need JAVA_HOME are doing? It seems a bit of a kludge, but that
could be my inexp
On Friday 12 November 2004 06:14, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ~I am pretty sure that Eclipse 3.x still relies on the
> eclipse/{plugins/features}/ layout, if I understand your meaning. Can
> you expound on the problems this presents in your view,
Hi folks.
I have many packages that indirectly depend on these products (and
indeed other sun products), but from reading the Sun license, I cannot
package these products as currently licensed from Sun.
For instance, the javamail license says:
"... Sun
grants you a non-exclusive, non-trans
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:28:37PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> OTOH, some people told me that writing Maven plugins was rather easy, so
> I assume it would be possible to hook up Maven somehow to work with
> native packaging systems, instead of working around them.
To me, it appears that Mave
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 11:06:16PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> BTW xsltproc is blazingly fast here - I doubt a shell implementation
> would be any faster. In fact I suspect it'll end up faster than anything
> in shell - all the optimizations the Gnome folks did to process heavy
> docbook docum
6 matches
Mail list logo
