On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:41:28AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > If a package is distributed under a DFSG license, a dependency with the
> > [Sun's]
> > JDK (or other non-free libraries/compilers/tools) make it non-free?
>
> No, it moves it to "contrib" (that's where I've put Muffin). C
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 02:30:11PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> *I* would not mind (I'm a pragmatic), providing the *detailed* (i.e.
> Makefile) instructions for recompiling are in the Debian package (one of the
> packages which started the thread seems genuinely incompilable on Debian).
Regarding the following bugs related to some of my packges:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/49/49557.html
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/49/49688.html
I'd like to have a direction to follow regarding the use of pre-compiled
classes in Debian packages. In other w
I agree with most of your ideas, but I guess it's better to separate the
classpath required for the vm's, libraries and 'applications' (in the meaning
of java programs with main classes). The idea is to create a dependency system
for the classpaths definitions.
As an example, assume the follow
Hi again,
Do you think it's a good idea to build an installer for jdk-1.2 as well?
I've built an experimental package, which is available from:
http://www.pobox.com/~julio/debian/jdk1.2-installer/
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 10:48:21AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> It lloks like the blackdown JDK ha
5 matches
Mail list logo
