Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-02-10 Thread John Leuner
classpath 0.07-2 has been accepted. Please let me know if there any problems with it or jikes-classpath John Leuner On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 00:33, Ben Burton wrote: > > Would it work if, say, classpath built a new package > > 'jikes-with-classpath' (whatever the name,

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread John Leuner
versioning changes should I make for the new classpath package? John Leuner > > Since jikes doesn't not have any platform specific parts in it, it is > quite certain that jikes will not prevent JVM from getting into testing > if these wrappers go into JVM. > > > - Adam >

Compiling java debian packages with free tools

2003-09-10 Thread John Leuner
program that can be compiled with free software but not run with free software to go into main. Whatever the outcome of that argument, I still feel it is very important to focus on being able to compile with free tools and getting a larger community involved in identifying and fixing problems. --

Compiling java debian packages with free tools

2003-09-10 Thread John Leuner
program that can be compiled with free software but not run with free software to go into main. Whatever the outcome of that argument, I still feel it is very important to focus on being able to compile with free tools and getting a larger community involved in identifying and fixing problems. --

Re: Virtual machines in Debian

2003-05-09 Thread John Leuner
Another free JVM in debian is kissme. Functionality is very similar to sablevm (both use GNU Classpath). The JRVM from IBM should be relatively easy to package for Debian, I haven't got round to it yet. John Leuner On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 14:15, Mark Howard wrote: > On Tue, 2003-04-15

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add some package from 'classpath'

2003-04-16 Thread John Leuner
e implications for different versions of these classes. Users may not upgrade all these packages at the same time so they could have different versions in different places. -- John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add some package from 'classpath'

2003-04-15 Thread John Leuner
ain! > :-) > > It's my first proposal so I do not know where we go from here? A vote? > John what do you think? I don't think we need a vote, if anyone has objections or better suggestions I'm sure they will tell us. -- John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: GNU Classpath 0.05

2003-03-12 Thread John Leuner
age > gnujaxp. Yeah, this would be cool. Perhaps you could just make modifications to the classpath deb package to also produce a jaxp .deb? John Leuner

Re: GNU Classpath 0.05

2003-03-12 Thread John Leuner
age > gnujaxp. Yeah, this would be cool. Perhaps you could just make modifications to the classpath deb package to also produce a jaxp .deb? John Leuner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

GNU Classpath 0.05

2003-03-05 Thread John Leuner
ation and report any errors/missing parts to the Classpath developers. Classpath aims to be compatible with the 1.2 libraries shipped by Sun. Currently most of this is implemented, but there are still missing parts. -- John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

GNU Classpath 0.05

2003-03-05 Thread John Leuner
ation and report any errors/missing parts to the Classpath developers. Classpath aims to be compatible with the 1.2 libraries shipped by Sun. Currently most of this is implemented, but there are still missing parts. -- John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

2002-08-26 Thread John Leuner
ng some java code against a set of interfaces (whether they are actual java interfaces, or just some java classes), and then running your program with a GPL'ed implementation of said interfaces. Are you violating the GPL in the first or second instance? John Leuner

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environmentconsising of free Java tools

2002-08-26 Thread John Leuner
ng some java code against a set of interfaces (whether they are actual java interfaces, or just some java classes), and then running your program with a GPL'ed implementation of said interfaces. Are you violating the GPL in the first or second instance? John Leuner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread John Leuner
r. > Since you'll need a VM installed anyway, you can just depend on that, and if > another jar is installed (via alternatives), it will be used automatically. but will it work? I don't want to depend on a non-free jdk when there is a free tool which will work. John Leuner

Re: building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread John Leuner
Since you'll need a VM installed anyway, you can just depend on that, and if > another jar is installed (via alternatives), it will be used automatically. but will it work? I don't want to depend on a non-free jdk when there is a free tool which will work. John Leuner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread John Leuner
revent breakages when things change. John Leuner

building java packages

2000-12-26 Thread John Leuner
ns to prevent breakages when things change. John Leuner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Java GUI builder using XML

2000-11-25 Thread John Leuner
Does anyone know of a free Java GUI builder that uses XML to specify what widgets go where? I'm looking for a tool that either generates java code to be compiled, or dynamically creates the GUI at runtime. I'm sure there is at least one such non-free tool, but I haven't found a

Java GUI builder using XML

2000-11-25 Thread John Leuner
Does anyone know of a free Java GUI builder that uses XML to specify what widgets go where? I'm looking for a tool that either generates java code to be compiled, or dynamically creates the GUI at runtime. I'm sure there is at least one such non-free tool, but I haven't found a

Re: ITP enhydra

2000-09-06 Thread John Leuner
ere the compiler looks for a class that you don't actually use, but then strictly speaking it is not a dependency, only a token dependency. John Leuner

Re: ITP enhydra

2000-09-06 Thread John Leuner
e compiler looks for a class that you don't actually use, but then strictly speaking it is not a dependency, only a token dependency. John Leuner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ITP enhydra

2000-09-05 Thread John Leuner
ting that you if can run a Java "binary" you'll also be able to build the sources very easily. This is because Java is always linked at run time, so the build-time and run-time dependencies are the same. John Leuner

Re: ITP enhydra

2000-09-05 Thread John Leuner
run a Java "binary" you'll also be able to build the sources very easily. This is because Java is always linked at run time, so the build-time and run-time dependencies are the same. John Leuner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A suggestion to list core classes

2000-08-29 Thread John Leuner
Java > > /usr/share/java/repository > > > > Advice? It may be obvious, but there could be cases where one JVM uses different versions of a class library (or different class libraries). So just make sure to cater for versioned class libs. /usr/share/classpath0.00/rt.jar /usr/share/classpath -> symlinked to default / latest classpath ? /usr/share/classpath_with_sable_mods0.01/rt.jar John Leuner

Re: A suggestion to list core classes

2000-08-29 Thread John Leuner
> /usr/share/java/repository > > > > Advice? It may be obvious, but there could be cases where one JVM uses different versions of a class library (or different class libraries). So just make sure to cater for versioned class libs. /usr/share/classpath0.00/rt.jar /usr/share/classpa

Re: Java development on debian ppc

2000-07-10 Thread John Leuner
ose to concentrate on free software. GNU/Linux is a UNIX clone. UNIX wasn't free. John Leuner

Re: Java development on debian ppc

2000-07-10 Thread John Leuner
ncentrate on free software. GNU/Linux is a UNIX clone. UNIX wasn't free. John Leuner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java development on debian ppc

2000-07-08 Thread John Leuner
> On Saturday 1 July 2000, at 1 h 18, > the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I would rephrase it: if there is no Free Java solution > ... > > > then we should stop working with Java and start encouraging > > > people to

Re: Java development on debian ppc

2000-07-08 Thread John Leuner
> On Saturday 1 July 2000, at 1 h 18, > the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I would rephrase it: if there is no Free Java solution > ... > > > then we should stop working with Java and start encouraging > > > people to

Re: Java development on debian ppc

2000-06-30 Thread John Leuner
thor of the kissme VM. My work is still x86 only, but as the JVM gets more mature I see no reason why it would be difficult to port to PPC. John Leuner

Re: Java development on debian ppc

2000-06-30 Thread John Leuner
r of the kissme VM. My work is still x86 only, but as the JVM gets more mature I see no reason why it would be difficult to port to PPC. John Leuner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]