"Trygve Laugstøl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 17:08 +0100, MrDemeanour wrote:
Java stuff tends to depend on ant; I read something that seemed to say
that ant was licence-dodgy, at some point in time. Pages need timestamps!
That is also
"MrDemeanour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Vaughan wrote:
Debian stable is uh, stable. Except for security bugs or other
serious bugs, it doesn't get updated.
I see. I've read Kraft's "Debian System" book several times, but I
hadn't twigged that stabl
"Nikita Salnikov-Tarnovski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
Just one question: why package eclipse-base depends on gij-4.0 and not
java-runtime ?
Nikem.
I would like to know that. I thought I was assured that java-runtime would
be used so that I did not need
Thanks guys.
Sorry for remaining stale (Wait, does coffee get stale?) in my java
knowledge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Andrew Overholt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-22 14:51]:
>From http://www.backports.org/~mkoch/unstable/ eclipse_3.1-10.diff.gz it
>appears that first the (bootstrap) ecj compiler is built
Yes. It's not necessary, though, afaik, simply depending on
java-virtual-machine/java2-runtime should do the trick as
well, as the non-free
VMs should provide that just like the free VMs.
Excelent. That is what i was wanting to know. :)
Long ago with the dreaded 'eclipse running illegally on k
The new packages run on kaffe? (it sounds that way, If you used a
different
free jvm them just 's/kaffe/[name of other JVM]/' for the following
questions.)
Afaik, yes. And on gcj/gij. And surely on the various other up-to-date
free
runtimes in Debian, since they all use pretty much the same
"Michael Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:55:07PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
Michael said:
>The second option was done long ago, originally for Fedora.
>
It would be the best if Eclipse.org just moved up to tomc
Michael said:
The second option was done long ago, originally for Fedora.
It would be the best if Eclipse.org just moved up to tomcat5. The more
debian's eclipse deviates from upsteam the more of a pain it is on both the
debian maintainer and on upstream.
Off topic but just to throw this
9 matches
Mail list logo
