Hi.
Am Sonntag, dem 23.03.2025 um 08:50 +0100 schrieb PICCA Frederic-
Emmanuel:
> It seems that all test PASS.
So in this case retriggering helped, thanks. But hints to documentation
would be still nice. I might need it the next time.
Sincerely,
Joachim
Hi.
A package I just uploaded [1] is blocked. Are there any guidelines on
what I am expected to do? Should I create a bug for the blocking
package?
Sincerely,
Joachim
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=mosquitto
Am Donnerstag, den 05.12.2013, 07:58 +0100 schrieb Joachim Zobel:
> I'll append a summary to the pu and ask for going directly to stable.
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728906
Sincerely,
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.or
Hi.
Is there a git policy concerning on undoing commits. I have committed
and pushed) a first attempt to build netbeans with openjdk-7, which is
most likely obsolete (and not working on unstable). Should I delete it
or should I commit an inverse change.
Sincerely,
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Am Mittwoch, den 04.12.2013, 08:00 +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> You should be able to build with both versions of Ant by adding some
> type casting.
Doing this would make the change less suitable for stable. Currently the
change adds half a dozen lines to the launcher script and modifies a
line
Am Mittwoch, den 04.12.2013, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> Well, in this case, Joachim, we should consider a different plan of action:
> * get in touch with the release team about the situation (that Debian
> unstable is too different from stable to upload first -6 in unstable
> without ch
Am Montag, den 02.12.2013, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> Yeh. I tried to build it with an hardcoded dependency on java 6 but it
> failed.
>
> If someone could try to build a netbeans 7.0.1+dfsg1-6 in unstable
> (needed before going to stable), I will upload it.
Is that, what you tried?
Am Montag, den 25.11.2013, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> With openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u25-2.3.12-4)
The netbeans package does not build with openjdk-7. Since my intention
was to change as little as possible and since I am not very
knowledgeable about java packaging I did not change that.
I
Hi.
Since no one has uploaded this yet I wanted to advertise this a bit.
The netbeans package is currently broken, in that
you can't create projects (#720684),
SVN is not working (#698514, #668015) and
the GUI builder is not working (#677125, #653915).
This affects stable, the package is inte
Am Donnerstag, den 07.11.2013, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Am 06.11.2013 21:11, schrieb Joachim Zobel:
> > * Workaround for bug #720684 in openjdk-6-jdk.
> > - Changes the jdk dependency to openjdk-7-jdk.
> > - Changes the laucher script to use openjd
ug #698514 (Closes: #698514, Closes: #668015).
Adds a classpath command line argument in the launcher.
* Workaround for bug #677125 (Closes: #677125, Closes: #653915).
Adds a classpath command line argument in the launcher.
-- Joachim Zobel Sun, 03 Nov 2013 14:46:31
+0100
The packag
Am Samstag, den 02.11.2013, 13:42 -0700 schrieb tony mancill:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:39:46PM +0100, Joachim Zobel wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 27.10.2013, 18:01 +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> > > how does it "reduce complexity"?
> >
> > The diff of
Am Sonntag, den 27.10.2013, 18:01 +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> how does it "reduce complexity"?
The diff of the launcher script is about 5-10 lines shorter if I am not
searching for a suitable java7 (which I can't reliably identify anyway)
but go straight for openjdk-7-jdk.
Sincerely,
Joachim
Am Samstag, den 26.10.2013, 08:30 -0700 schrieb tony mancill:
> So you'll note that the provides is for java7-sdk (not java7-jdk).
> The
> JDK gets installed into /usr/lib/jvm/jdk-7-oracle-x64/
This tell me that my searching for a usable java7 did not work with
oracle java. So I'll go for openjdk-
Hi.
There are none in wheezy, are there any outside of debian? ubuntu?
oracle?
(I found I can reduce complexity of my netbeans patch if I go straight
for openjdk-7-jdk instead of java7-jdk).
Sincerely,
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Am Freitag, den 25.10.2013, 22:59 -0700 schrieb Vincent Cheng:
> Essentially, you have to request permission from the
> release team first
What is the best way to do that?
Sincerely,
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Hi.
Unfortunately it is what I want. So what I need to do is to write an RFS
requesting an upload to proposed-updates. This should explain in detail
why I think this is appropriate (Fixes important bugs).
Shouldn't the changelog say
netbeans (7.0.1+dfsg1-6) stable; urgency=medium
in this case?
Hi.
I have a netbeans package that fixes three bugs by working around and
which is intended for stable. How do I express this?
Is a changelog entry
netbeans (7.0.1+dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=medium
the right way?
Sincerely,
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.deb
Hi.
I am still trying to get netbeans fixed. As far as I have understood the
next step is to push my changes to the git repository. To do this I need
to be a member of the pkg-java project on the fusion forge web site at
alioth.debian.org. Correct?
Could any kind soul with the authority to do so
(7.0.1+dfsg1-6) stable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Workaround for bug #720684 in openjdk-6-jdk.
+ * Workaround for bug #698514 (Closes: #698514).
+
+ -- Joachim Zobel Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:47:04 +0200
+
netbeans (7.0.1+dfsg1-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Include junit library definitions.
diff --git
Hi.
Why do both exist? openjdk7 only provides java7-jdk, is this correct?
Sicerely,
Joachim
jo@backspace:~/projects/debian/netbeans$ aptitude show java7-jdk
No current or candidate version found for java7-jdk
Package: java7-jdk
State: not a real package
Provided by: openjdk-7-jdk
jo@backspace:~/
Hi.
Now I know what to do but I find myself unable to do it. I am using the
debian wheezy package sources from git and I can't create a patch.
What I would do is to have the package depend on java-7 only and to
change the ide-launcher to the attached one.
However my only option seems to be to m
Hi.
Is there any documentation on maintaining existing packages. The docs I
find focus on how to create a package. I myself currently try to find
out how the netbeans package from git works. I will find out, but it
could be a lot easier with a few one liners and a short explanation of
their contex
Hi.
To to create a patch that works around
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720684
I want to modify the netbeans dependencies in a way that says
"Can depend on any java 6 or java 7, but not openjdk 6. "
Can I express this with debian dependencies?
Looking at the control file it se
Hi.
Checking the cloned netbeans git repository with git gives me
$ find * -name netbeans -executable -type f
debian/netbeans/usr/share/netbeans/7.0.1/bin/netbeans
debian/netbeans/usr/bin/netbeans
nbbuild/netbeans/bin/netbeans
Those three files are all reported as untracked by git:
$ git statu
Hi.
Thanks for pointing out the difference between conffiles and
configuration files.
Since there is no java-7 symlink in /etc/alternatives I think I'll have
to choose the java 7 at startup. This is most likely best done in the
netbeans startup script.
Thanks,
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi.
An obvious workaround for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720684
would be to set the runtime jvm to java-7-openjdk while keeping the
compile time JVM at java 6. Is this acceptable or does it violate any
policies?
If so, what would be a good way to do this? Adding a reasona
Hi.
To find out how netbeans packaging works I cloned the netbeans git
repository mentioned in the source package.
Question is what to do now. Running jh_make in the netbeans directory
made me change the directory name to add the version. It then asked me
questions (Which build system) that gave
Am Mittwoch, den 11.09.2013, 22:17 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> No, at least this version has a check for 6 built in. Please check for
> 7.4.
What kind of check do you mean? Sure it is still there?
netbeans --jdkhome /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64
starts without complaining. Or is this becau
Am Mittwoch, den 11.09.2013, 22:19 +0200 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> * Join the debian pkg-java team on alioth
How do I do that?
> * package the new upstream release if any
This can not go into stable/wheezy, right?
> * fix bugs (like "yours") on the Debian and Ubuntu bug tracker
I would consider
Hi.
I did report the following bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720684
which makes netbeans half way unusable.
Should I write a referencing netbeans bug report?
Could you move netbeans to openjdk-7 as a workaround?
Sincerely,
Joachim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Am Mittwoch, den 11.09.2013, 21:06 +0200 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> However, it does not seem
> maintained anymore:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/netbeans.html
I already had that impression. I reported
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698514
in January that did not show any ac
32 matches
Mail list logo
