Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings

2019-03-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 06:19:14PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Yes, but the output, at runtime, will match the native architecture, > so it doesn’t matter if the i386, amd64, x32 packages are installed > for them, or even e.g. the armel package, with qemu-user hooked up > via binfmt-misc, the o

Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings

2019-03-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:24:27PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Yes, but these are all arch:all already, so unless they have not-arch:all > dependencies, this ought to work (I really can’t think of a way to > implement something in arch:all with only arch:all dependencies that > doesn’t work as

Re: cross-building OpenJDK and JNI bindings

2019-03-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Matthias, On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:08:48PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > According to http://crossqa.subdivi.de/src/openjdk-11 there is one missing > issue > to cross build OpenJDK itself (#925467, please make ant and ant-optional M-A: > foreign). Note that the Debian tracker gives this M-