On 13 August 2013 06:34, tony mancill wrote:
> I'll take a look and intend to sponsor this. New packages take a bit
> longer because of the license review, but I'll get back to you with any
> questions.
>
Thanks, Tony!
Hi Java packagers
I'm still looking for someone to review and sponsor the following
package, please:
* Package name : eclipse-eclox
Version : 0.10.0
Upstream Author : Guillaume Brocker
* URL : http://home.gna.org/eclox/
* License : EPL
Description : simple doxygen frontend plug-in for
On 27 June 2013 14:45, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The EPL has the advantage of being "definitely compatible" but it may be
> to liberal in some cases[1].
>
Good news, upstream have released a new version under the EPL.
I have relocated my packaging attempt to pkg-java [1] and updated it.
Anyone wil
I've made contact with Guillaume Brocker and he is happy to release Eclox
under a different license.
Which would be better for Debian; GPL + permission to combine with Eclipse,
or EPL?
On 26 June 2013 17:31, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I always considered the two licenses for completely incompatiable, but
> it is possible that interpretation have been too zealous. But IANAL.
>
A friend referred me to blog posts [1] [2] which provide more information
on the EPL/GPL issue.
The FSF b
On 26/06/2013 16:39, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-06-19 08:37, Graham Inggs wrote:
Dear Java packagers
I'm looking for someone to review and sponsor the following package, please:
* Package name : eclipse-eclox
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Guillaume Brocker
* URL :
Dear Java packagers
I'm looking for someone to review and sponsor the following package, please:
* Package name : eclipse-eclox
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Guillaume Brocker
* URL : http://home.gna.org/eclox/
* License : GPL-2+
Description : simple doxygen frontend plug-in for Eclip
7 matches
Mail list logo
