RFS: libimglib2-java/4.5.0-1

2017-10-31 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Dear all, I have upgraded libimglib2-java [1] to the latest upstream version. Could anyone sponsor this upload please? [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-java/libimglib2-java.git Changes since last upload: * New upstream version 4.5.0 * Bump the standards version to 4.1.1 Cheers, Ghi

RFS: libimglib2-java/4.4.0-1

2017-09-15 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Dear all, I have upgraded libimglib2-java [1] to the latest upstream version. Could anyone sponsor its upload please? [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-java/libimglib2-java.git Changes since last upload: * New upstream version 4.4.0 * Bump standards version to 4.1.0 Cheers, Ghis

Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java

2017-08-18 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 16/08/17 21:29, Markus Koschany wrote: I believe we should keep it simple and try to avoid using build profiles except someone is really going to work on this stuff and files bug reports and identifies key packages. If we decide to add build profiles we should do it in a consistent way though.

Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java

2017-08-16 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 16/08/17 19:47, Markus Koschany wrote: Am 15.08.2017 um 11:18 schrieb Ghislain Vaillant: I never had to use build profiles because for me it was always something related to bootstrapping Debian as a whole. This is actually the first Java package I have seen where someone makes use of the

Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java

2017-08-15 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 14/08/17 23:03, Markus Koschany wrote: Am 14.08.2017 um 22:45 schrieb Ghislain Vaillant: On 14/08/17 21:11, Markus Koschany wrote: 2. I saw the no-doc build profile annotations in debian/control. Is that something that you specifically need for libimglib2-java or is there another reason

Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java

2017-08-14 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 14/08/17 21:11, Markus Koschany wrote: Am 12.08.2017 um 17:02 schrieb tony mancill: [...] I spoke with Markus yesterday about libimglib2-java and so will wait to hear back from him before starting on that one. Again *thank you* for your patience, and for your contribution to Debian! Hi,

Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java

2017-08-13 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 12/08/17 16:02, tony mancill wrote: On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 04:11:07PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: On 04/08/17 15:40, tony mancill wrote: On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:50:22PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Two of the leaf packages are Imglib2 [1] and Parsington [2] for which I have

Re: Advice regarding Java packages for SimpleITK

2017-08-10 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 08/08/17 21:56, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: On 08/05/2017 10:16 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: I was wondering which files should be installed (and to which location) to produce corresponding Java packages which are policy compliant. Hi Ghislain, As I understand you'll need two binary pac

Java packaging with gradle

2017-08-08 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Dear Java team, In my quest to package ImageJ2 for Debian, I came across some leaf dependencies which need to be packaged and use gradle as their build system. I was wondering whether we had Debian helpers for that, or at least a representative package I could inspire myself from? Best rega

Advice regarding Java packages for SimpleITK

2017-08-05 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Dear all, I am in the process of packaging SimpleITK [1] for Debian which provides several language bindings around the ITK C++ library using swig. [1] https://github.com/SimpleITK/SimpleITK So far, I have only taken care of the common C++ library and Python 3 bindings, but Java is also supp

Re: RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java

2017-08-04 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 04/08/17 15:40, tony mancill wrote: On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:50:22PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Dear Debian Java Team, I am undertaking the effort of packaging ImageJ version 2.x for Debian, which requires the packaging of quite a few Java libraries as a result of the

RFS for libimglib2-java and libparsington-java

2017-08-04 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Dear Debian Java Team, I am undertaking the effort of packaging ImageJ version 2.x for Debian, which requires the packaging of quite a few Java libraries as a result of the modularization of the code base. Two of the leaf packages are Imglib2 [1] and Parsington [2] for which I have prepared

Re: Possible problematic terms of use of OSGi library

2015-12-08 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 08/12/15 12:01, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Hi, I was on my way trying to package org.osgi.core 6 and before downloading I have to agree with this page: https://www.osgi.org/developer/downloads/release-6/release-6-no-form/ In the "License Grant", it seems that it could be problematic to packag

Re: packaging of swig generated wrappers

2014-05-19 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 23:56 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 16/05/2014 20:17, Ghislain Vaillant a écrit : > > > So far, I have created a libismrmrd-java.install which moves the JNI > > file to /usr/lib/jni and the JAR to /usr/share/java. > > > > Is that enoug

packaging of swig generated wrappers

2014-05-16 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi everyone, I am currently packaging a C++ library (ISMRMRD) which generates Java bindings using SWIG. The build system is CMake and it installs the Java bindings to /ismrmrd/java. The latter include a JNI library (libjismrmrd.so) and a JAR file (ismrmrd.jar). So far, I have created a libis