ncies and
paths are set right.
Cheers, Eric
--
I'm subscribed on debian-java, debian-mentors, pkg-java-maintainers and
pkg-vdr-dvb-devel.
No need to CC me on these lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
that sounds right to me.
Eric
Jonathan Yu wrote:
>Hey Scott,
>
>It has been said that "There are only two hard things in Computer
>Science: cache invalidation and naming things." -- Phil Karlton :-)
>
>The binary package was of the most concern to me, because that
pplication over a network
>to
>a remote user. If the application is used only locally an applet
>doesn't
>make sense, the application could simply be packaged as a desktop
>application.
We're in agreement but I don't get your point: at least for Free{plane, Mind},
the
Hi Joachim,
Not in front of my PC but I guess that some package requires java7-sdk but that
it's provided by nothing.
Eric
Joachim Zobel wrote:
>Hi.
>
>Why do both exist? openjdk7 only provides java7-jdk, is this correct?
>
>Sicerely,
>Joachim
>
>jo@backspa
es, just to get the library created with version, and be able to
soft-link it unversioned.
Cheers, Eric
--
You don't need to CC me on debian-java, debian-mentors and
pkg-java-maintainers.
Please CC me on other Debian lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian
ourself to Uploaders agreed with the team ? (It's just an honest
question, because I'm not part of the team.) If Eric Lavarde is no longer
working on this package then please remove him from Uploaders.
Agreed with the team and me but, indeed, I can/should be removed.
There are more copyr
Hi,
Balancing jar size vs. simplicity of the solution, I'd definitely vote for
simplicity: priceless, for everything else there is cheap disk space and
bandwidth!
Cheers, Eric
--
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debia
now) advisories and
security patches should be/are backported to the version currently
packaged, and I think that's what's important because it's not like there
would be new features introduced.
Cheers, Eric
--
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Hello,
On 19/01/13 15:56, Felix Natter wrote:
Eric Lavarde writes:
Hi,
hi Eric!
finally I am making progress with the freeplane package :-)
Good to hear!
On 01/12/12 14:09, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Back on your issue with get-orig-source, it works like a charm here:
I think I know what
leave it open until next week (gives one
more week-end for people to react) and then close it (if votes continue to
go in the same direction, of course).
Cheers, Eric
--
You don't need to CC me on debian-java, debian-mentors and
pkg-java-maintainers.
Please CC me on other Debian li
g (but I might be wrong, I don't know any
example)
Conclusion: I vote against + close the bug.
Cheers, Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50f4678a.1040...@zorglub.s.bawue.de
directly contact Christian (upstream), but you can
start with (d) aka ignore, ugly but not more, and once you're finished
with simplyhtml + freeplane, go with (a) or (c), with an updated version
of simplyhtml resp. freeplane package. Probably simpler than fix all at
once.
Hope this helps, Eric
Hi,
On 02/12/12 10:56, Thomas Koch wrote:
Eric Lavarde:
=> there are three options:
Have you considered to patch the Debian version of freeplane to your needs?
man dpkg-source, search: "3.0 (quilt)"
http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/07/04/how-to-prepare-patches-for-debian-
p
m...
I'm out of any packaging, so please contact Christian yourself, and (a)
(or d) seems the most straightforward until a new version of FreeMind is
packaged with the fix.
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bafdb4.6080...@zorglub.s.bawue.de
Hi,
On 01/12/12 14:09, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Back on your issue with get-orig-source, it works like a charm here:
I think I know what happened: you had already modified the changelog to
0.16.05 in which case uscan doesn't download anything because it
considers that you are already at th
ownloaded updated package SimplyHTML_src_0_16_05.tar.gz
and symlinked simplyhtml_0.16.05.orig.tar.gz to it
-- Scan finished
~/ALIOTH/simplyhtml$ ll ..
[...]
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ericl ericl 29 Dec 1 13:40
simplyhtml_0.16.05.orig.tar.gz -> SimplyHTML_src_0_16_05.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 ericl ericl 4871
the
next SimplyHTML version.
You'll need it anyway for the future, so see
http://wiki.debian.org/Java/JavaSvn
Hope this helps, if not come back to me,
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50b0b08...@zorglub.s.bawue.de
Done deal! :-)
Thanks, Eric
Andrew Ross said:
> On 22/10/11 11:19, Eric Lavarde wrote:
>>
>> * libjcalendar-java - used to be a dependency of FreeMind, not anymore,
>> dependency of no package, and popcon 52 - candidate for removal!
>>
>
> Eric,
>
> Please
Hello Cedric,
On 22/10/11 13:24, Cédric Pineau wrote:
Hello Eric.
I once waited for an answer from Christine regarding freemind and then
forgot it all, but I'm still interested in packaging it and related libs.
I currently trying to package EJS with Georges Khaznadar (Georges is
d
rson doesn't
react anymore. I tend to think I was right with my opinion about good
future packagers, bad luck and try again, but I'd also like to hear
others' opinion.
Thanks, Eric
[1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=deb%40zorglub.s.bawue.de
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
#x27;t even find the time to flag it).
Cheers, Eric
On 22/09/11 16:57, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
2011/9/22 Cédric Pineau:
Hi to all.
Hello Cédric,
I noticed that freemind was looking for an adopter
Did I get wrong about the need on this package ?
Probably not. Eric comments in #622960 tha
#x27;s "UNSTABLE" after
all...
so i removed unstable from sources.list and put... stable ! then #apt-get
install eclipse -t stable >it installed fine eclipse 3.5
rgds
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Delcamp
Date: Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:14 AM
Subject: package "e
ok guys, thanks for your answers.
i still feel would be nice to have eclipse on testing without adding
unstable but i'll follow your advices.
take care,
Eric
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2011-08-29 10:25, Eric Delcamp wrote:
> > yes indeed i thi
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Eric Delcamp:
> > Hum... sorry but this official page ( http://www.debian.org/releases/ )
> > tells that :
> >
> > The current stable distribution of Debian is version 6.0, codenamed
> > *squeeze *.
>
&g
Hum... sorry but this official page ( http://www.debian.org/releases/ )
tells that :
The current stable distribution of Debian is version 6.0, codenamed *squeeze
*.
The current testing distribution is *wheezy*.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> de
On 23/08/11 01:14, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
Hello,
This year I participated in GSoC for the Apache James (Java enterprise
email client) and I wish to package and maintain James for Debain.
Eric my mentor just told me that I have been accepted as an Apache
comiter for James so I will be able to
need first to decide to
get rid of the Java-CVS Repo.
As we already had a discussion about removing old versions from the SVN
Repository, I guess that the default is that nobody cares about old CVS
stuff...
Anybody speaking _against_ removing the CVS Repo?
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Hello,
I sent the below email to Roland before my holiday but didn't get any
answer and the problem is still there.
Does one of you have a more direct access to Roland or anybody else able
to solve or advise on how to solve the issue?
Thanks, Eric
Original Me
/freeplane/freeplane_1.1.3-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Eric Lavarde
PS: Lintian currently complains about the class-path manifest, but we
agreed on the Debian Java list that this is a special case (due to OSGi
specifics) that Lintian might be able t
On 05/06/11 14:47, Niels Thykier wrote:
LINTIAN_ROOT="" frontend/lintian
$ LINTIAN_ROOT="" frontend/lintian -vi
/home/ericl/ALIOTH/build-area/freeplane_1.1.3-1_i386.changes
N: Setting up lab in /tmp/xpbW7820tM ...
N:
N: Processing changes file freeplane_1.1.3-1_i386 (version 1.1.3-1) ..
On 05/06/11 13:07, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Actually could you test it with Lintian from the current git master?
Note that the new Lintian will only output the "wrong" parts of a
class-path entry, so the output will differ here.
If it's simple and you tell me how :-)
Eric
Answering
On 04/06/11 14:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2011-06-04 14:43, Eric Lavarde wrote:
But once I've patched away the class-path entry, it complains about a
missing class-path, and no jar file in Freeplane has actually a
class-path!?
Not the entire classpath, only the "../" entry
d.
I'll add an override in the mean time.
Particularly I hope we have more OSGi experience and can make better
decisions for these cases at that time.
Fine with me.
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
es based on
> /usr/share/freeplane/core/org.freeplane.core/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF (and
> to make it even more fun, anyway doesn't accept absolute paths, already
> tried).
> Sounds to me like a case for a Lintian override, any other opinion?
>
> Thanks, Eric
>
>
Linti
A-INF/MANIFEST.MF (and
to make it even more fun, anyway doesn't accept absolute paths, already
tried).
Sounds to me like a case for a Lintian override, any other opinion?
Thanks, Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
ure is set to true.
Did something change relatively recently in terms of Xalan and/or
security settings?
Thanks, Eric
PS: I already asked upstream, they don't have a clue and suspect a
Debian specific setting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
is that, invoked with -jar, java ignores any classpath from
the command line and uses only the one from the manifest, which explains
the differences in behavior your are experiencing.
Works as designed ;-)
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
this direction seems best.
Of course, java6 and java5 should be replaced by the correct statement
in regard to OpenJDK, Sun's Java, GCJ and/or default-jre...
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
entors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/freeplane/freeplane_1.1.1-1.dsc
- and also present in Svn-Java
svn+ssh://ewl-gu...@svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/freeplane
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind r
be adapted to 1.0
Cheers, Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c42cb94.90...@lavar.de
?
Thanks for comments,
I've tried FreeMind with fop version 1.0 and, when I try to export to
PDF (menu File -> Export -> As PDF), I get the below errors, which I
don't get with version 0.95 (unstable environment).
Help would be appreciated.
Thanks, Eric
STDERR: java.lang.NoClassDef
va
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Eric Lavarde
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c42ae10@zorglub.s.bawue.de
rsion 1.0 nor a changelog.
And make please the couple of weeks, a few weeks, it's holiday season
here...
For info, I'm trying to get freeplane [2] in Debian before the freeze,
which also depends on fop.
Thanks, Eric
[1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/index.html
[2] http://freepla
Hello,
could someone sponsor the below package? I need it in order to get
Freeplane in Debian.
Matthew, wo reviewed it already, expressed lack of time to finalize
sponsoring.
Thanks, Eric
PS: sources are also in pkg-java SVN.
Original Message
Subject: 'knopflerfish
On 09/05/10 03:03, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade.
but may we remove version 1.0 from the archive at least?
Yes, please, do.
Thanks, Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
package).
Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade.
Hope this is OK, and sorry for the trouble, I wanted to inform you right
now, but well, then I discovered your email...
Eric
On 08/05/10 17:40, Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi,
I have updated freemind in our svn repo to work
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote:
Eric Lavarde wrote:
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
one more thing: we could actually also get rid of all javaX-runtime
where X
< 6, or is there any package left in Debian that provides only less than
java6?
Package:
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
one more thing: we could actually also get rid of all javaX-runtime where X
< 6, or is there any package left in Debian that provides only less than
java6?
Package: gcj-4.4-jre
Provides: java-runtime, java1-runt
t could be that quite a lot of packages wouldn't be
policy compliant anymore, because they wouldn't work with "all" JRE anymore.
You might say that it's a constructed case, and it is, that's why I can
live with this, but it means still for me that the policy isn&#x
Hi,
one more thing: we could actually also get rid of all javaX-runtime
where X < 6, or is there any package left in Debian that provides only
less than java6?
Backport might be a concern, but then sun-java5 is not present in older
versions than sun-java6, so...
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCR
y own experience, I know it that I check what upstream says (Java5),
I compile it with OpenJDK6, and then it doesn't work with Java5 anymore.
But that's probably mostly wording, bottom line, both _must_ be aligned.
Thanks, Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists
et values corresponding to this X.
Even less important, a typo in the GCJ patch:
A request for permission to add gcj should packages should convince the
Java Team that [...]
(the "should packages" is probably too much)
Participating to my confusion: I'm not sure where in the
pinion, "privat*" is only used once within the
Debian Policy.
Thanks for your effort, it would really be great to have an updated Java
Policy in the next Debian,
Eric
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Draft
[2]
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.
we have
java-runtime, java5-runtime, java6-runtime (plus headless variants). Not
forgetting java-sdk, java2-compiler, java2-sdk, java5-sdk, java6-sdk.
And let us also not forget the gcj/gij stuff, which provides the above
inofficial virtual packages without actually being fully compatibl
Hi,
are these 2 reassignments within 6 hours normal? Or should we discuss
about it before it escalates?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571532
Eric
--- Begin Message ---
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 571532 ant
Bug #571532 [gij] gij: Bus er
Hello again,
I was rightly pointed to the fact that I had forgotten to put the
sources in SVN (thanks for the hint, Niels); it's now done and available
under
svn+ssh://ewl-gu...@svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/knopflerfish-osgi
So, still waiting for a DD,
Thanks, Eric
Eric Lavarde
Hello again,
I have a very small update of FreeMind necessary to overcome a problem
with ant 1.8. Could some DD upload the changes for me?
Thanks, Eric
--- Begin Message ---
Your upload of the package 'freemind' to mentors.debian.net was
successful. Sponsors can now download it.
Hello,
would some DD be so kind as to upload knopflerfish-osgi?
It's an OSGI framework implementation, and a dependency of Freeplane,
which I'm also planning to package for Debian.
Thanks, Eric
--- Begin Message ---
Your upload of the package 'knopflerfish-osgi' to me
Hello,
packaging for Java is not very different from other kind of packaging,
but you should nevertheless have a look at the Java Policy (same page as
below) and check http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/.
Eric
Fabrizio Furnari wrote:
Hi Eric,
many thanks for your suggestions, I'll sta
ing, your first lecture should be
http://www.debian.org/devel/, especially the New Maintainer's Guide
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
Hope this helps,
Eric
Fabrizio Furnari wrote:
Hi all,
this ML has been reported me by the mentors ML.
I'd like to join the Debian packagers team and
latest stable release. What do you think about
that?
Torsten
If that means being able to install both versions side by side, and
being able to redirect usage of ant using ANT_HOME (cdbs), then fine
with me.
It can be slightly more difficult but please document.
Cheers,
Eric
--
To
Any idea (and decision) how to best resolve (quickly) the situation?
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4b8a581f.8030...@lavar.de
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Werner wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
I'm not a big Java specialist, just a packager, but we've seen quite a lot
of FTBFS bugs due to the upload of ant 1.8. I'm personally hit by one for
FreeMind, so I would support Matthias&#x
for FreeMind, so I would support Matthias' suggestion until someone
explains what has actually changed in ant.
One more argument: ant 1.8 is obviously not backwards compatible with
ant 1.7; this makes it a transition, which shouldn't be started that
late and without preparation in
his error...
Thanks, Eric
Original Message
Subject: Bug#571376: freemind: FTBFS: freemind plugins do not exist From:
"Lucas Nussbaum"
Date:Thu, February 25, 2010 11:16
T
a packager's and sponsor's decision, no!?
Eric
Onkar Shinde wrote:
Hi all,
Now that dak supports source format 3.0 and people have already
started using it, should we jump the ship as a team? I am preparing
new upstream release for cortado and just wanted to know if now is the
good ti
Diederik, are you planning to put the packages in a publicly available
repository? I'd be interested.
Eric
Dalibor Topic said:
> Diederik de Haas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Some time ago it was decided that the sun java 5 packages should be
>> removed from the arc
Torsten Werner wrote:
This is a false positive because the first alternative dep is openjdk-6-jre.
Same for libjibx-java...
Eric
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
first try to move away ~/.java and see if the problem persists.
Eric
Kind regards
Claudia Neumann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Marcus Better wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Johnson wrote:
who is still active here and interested in the Java packaging policy?
count me in.
Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
ad of using locally
downloaded libraries. Then you get automatically patch updates and the
same.
Eric
Michael Su said:
> odinms.jar (this is just the server jar file)
>
> xttools.jar
>
> mina-core.jar
>
> jpcap.jar
>
> mysql-connector-java-bin.jar
>
> slf4j-a
nly states that option affects the
> version the source is assumed to be for and when I tried adding that
> option to the build for libgdata-java it didn't seem to make any
> difference to the class file version generated
That's what I wrote, you need to set 'source' _and_ &#
Hi,
I thought, you need to set ant.build.javac.source _and_
ant.build.javac.target to be on the safe side (resp. -target and -source)?
Wouldn't it make sense to "police" this? i.e. to state that all packages
should be explicitly compiled with 1.5 source/target unless they use 6&#x
ted to
package, if it's distributed with the library, is probably not in
agreement with this license, you should warn upstream.
Sorry, Eric
Steffen Moeller said:
> Hello,
>
> I know I should make this a RFP, but I am a bit lost
> about what the perfect package name would
> poss
Hi,
I thought that Batik 1.7 is not backwards compatible with Batik 1.6 (I
remember vaguely to have issues with this). If I'm right, wouldn't it
make sense to have a batik1.7 package name and keep batik (1.6)?
Thanks, Eric
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
I've done quite
op-in replacement that I/upstream could use.
Thanks, Eric
[1] http://java.sun.com/developer/techDocs/hi/repository/
--
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de NavarreCopyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Sun grants you ("Licensee") a non-exclusive, royalty free,
As an after-thought: you might want to check an existing web app package
and adapt it to your needs. From the description, tomcat5.5-webapps might
be a good fit.
Hope this helps, Eric
Eric Lavarde - Debian said:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> I move this thread to debian-java, where it belongs :-)
further)
- you can search also on http://wiki.debian.org/ (but I didn't find
anything).
- and you have more knowledgeable people than me on this list, which will
be happy to help you :-)
Cheers, Eric
Olivier Berger said:
> Hi.
>
> Is there any howto document explaining how to package a j
iner
ownership, and it's a dependency for the
yet-to-come-to-be-released-at-some-point-in-time FreeMind 0.9.0.
Kind regards
Eric Lavarde
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ot done in any other package) and undefined state, not to think about
problems you might get with diffs on binary files.
I think it would be a no-go for any mentoring DD (something I am not).
Hope this helps,
Eric
Onkar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
brary at all?
If you're willing to package and maintain it, there is a need :-) (but *I*
don't need it). You can check [4].
Eric
>
> Best regards
> Manuel
>
> [1] http://commons.apache.org/math/
>
>
[2] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/
to get the HTML.
One more thought: did you check that the logic is the same between
Matthew's javahelper and your tool? Is code sharing an option?
The worse that could happen to packagers would be different results from
those two tools; I can already imagine the mess... ;-)
Thanks, Eric
--
Hi,
my email was the last one in the chain, but I don't consider it was a
conclusive one.
Thanks, Eric
Eric Lavarde - Debian said:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Koch said:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:17:13PM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>>> On Wed May 21 22:06, Michael
d and SimplyHTML still don't work properly with GCI;
we read recently that there were issues with Azureus.
So, I still think that we need to make the difference between free and
complete implementations, and the original issue, which wasn't answered,
is that the Java policy needs to be up
with a round of bugs mass-filing...
My personal opinion is that the virtual packages should have 3 dimensions:
- jdk vs. runtime
- version 1, 2, 5, 6, 7...
- complete or not (i.e. (could) pass Java certification or not)
the virtual-machine vs. runtime thing doesn't seem really relevant to me..
Good stuff documented to http://wiki.debian.org/JavaFAQ
Eric
Manuel Prinz wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 22:27 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 21:04 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Mesing:
sudo pbuilder login --save-after-login
echo "sun-java5-jdk shared/acc
, Eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Michael Koch wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:14:29PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hi,
your first move to write to debian-user was the right one, debian-java
is meant for Java package developers, not for Java users.
JFTR: debian-java is for Java developers *AND* users.
I'm happy t
ready on etch).
But your best move is probably to try OpenOffice, but that's another story.
Eric
Frank Charles Gallacher wrote:
(I originally sent this to "debian-users" list. Sorry)
Subject:
Prob
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:01 PM, VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > The java6 packages don't appear to be buggy as such, the problem is that
>> the
>> > i386 packages haven
u mean by temporary. This has been broken for weeks
now (26 march) and prevent to install openoffice for example... If many
people where not running sid, many more bugs would be found much later...
--eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.1, which would explain why you haven't seen it until
now. I imagine it would go away if you turned off if you set
jdbcCompliantTruncation=false in your connection URL, although that
won't solve the underlying (potential) problem.
eric
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 04:43:04PM +0200, Michael
Any word on this? Anything I can do?
thanks,
eric
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 01:17:49PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Eric wrote:
> > A new upstream version of Connector/J has been released that fixes
> > many bugs. libmysql-java sho
A new upstream version of Connector/J has been released that fixes
many bugs. libmysql-java should probably be upgraded with it.
Thanks,
Eric Jensen
--
http://ir.iit.edu/~ej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PATH environment variable or
to make sure java is called with the right -cp statement.
>
> I read java debian policy, java debian faq, and I search on this list,
> but I couldn't find anything about this (I'm not java expert, as you can
> read here)
It's not topic of those
Hi Matthias,
I don't see the advantage of this approach over well defined virtual
packages, which I notice you seem anyway to implicitly expect
(java5-runtime, java5-sdk, etc...).
Can you perhaps elaborate a bit on this?
Thanks, Eric
Matthias Klose wrote:
[sent to debian
Hi,
Michael Koch said:
> I'm currently working on a proposal for cleaning up the virtual package
> chaos. Please give me some more days for this.
Fair enough, let's consider as a warm up for the discussion that will come
once you'll show your proposal ;-)
Thanks, Eric
--
Hi,
Michael Koch said:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
>> - the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on
>> java2-runtime only if the packager expects its program to work with a
>> classpath-alike implementation of
:
Michael Koch said:
> The X packages should only be in Recommends and its possible to not
> install Recommends (but you are expected you are knowing what you are
> doing).
Can we get an agreement on those points?
Eric
--
You don't need to CC me on debian-java, debian-mentor
Hi,
Matthias Klose wrote:
Eric Lavarde writes:
Hi everybody,
thanks for your answers, it looks like we don't have yet a consensus.
Let me try to suggest one.
POINT 1:
I would suggest to modify the Java Policy along these lines:
- the specific java runtimes listed before java(2)-ru
1 - 100 of 241 matches
Mail list logo
