Hi!
On 02/11/2023 21:24, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Hi ELTS people (mostly pochu, I guess),
for openjdk-8 tests, Vladimir tells me we “really” want jtreg5.
If it is possible to add a jtreg5 package to jessie and stretch
even if it exists nowhere else, perhaps with vendored dependencies
where appli
Hi,
On 03/12/2021 23:50, Markus Koschany wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
Am Freitag, dem 03.12.2021 um 14:28 +0100 schrieb Sylvain Beucler:
Hi,
This year I worked on libspring-java twice for LTS&ELTS. In both case
upstream provided limited information for the CVEs, and for 5 of them
we're unable to determ
Hi Thorsten,
On 02/12/2020 20:39, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Let me know how those tests go and we can proceed from there.
It builds, with the usual “most tests pass”, and the test
program I threw at it also works.
I have released this to
On 02/12/2020 11:21, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Hi Emilio,
If you can send a debdiff I'd be happy to take a look.
the debdiff between sid and stretch would be trivial, just
changelog and the regenerated debian/control file (attached).
I’m building it at the moment so I can test it first.
Do you
Hi Thorsten,
On 02/12/2020 10:06, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Hi (E)LTS-people,
I’ve just uploaded an OpenJDK 8 regression update to sid,
sponsored by my employer (as below). (I’m also building locally
for buster, wheezy and various *buntu releases, so all possible
systems I may encounter are covere
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
openjdk-7 was kept in experimental in order to prepare updates and see
them build, and later backport them to the security suites that still
had openjdk-7. However for a while now openjdk-7 hasn't built on
experimental anymore, and it's only supported
On 20/06/18 10:02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> Le 20/06/2018 à 08:53, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>
>> There is one remaining issue preventing the removal of netty-tcnative. netty
>> build-depends on libnetty-tcnative-java. Is that necessary?
>
> I
Hi Emmanuel,
There is one remaining issue preventing the removal of netty-tcnative. netty
build-depends on libnetty-tcnative-java. Is that necessary? If not, we can
remove it, otherwise we can update libnetty-tcnative-java to 1.2 and make other
rdeps use libnetty-tcnative-1.1-java as we discussed
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 19:34:55 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [...]
> > I tried to sort out what I could find as required for getting the
> > ancient eclipse out of testing in [1]:
> >
> > 1. src:bnd
> > You fixed that already.
> >
> > 2. bat
On 13/03/18 10:25, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 13.03.2018 09:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/03/18 10:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> As you can see it's a bunch of packages building with gcc-6 & g++-6. They
>>> probably
>>> need new u
On 05/11/14 14:24, Tim Retout wrote:
Hello,
On the day of the freeze, I have noticed that I never uploaded
zookeeper 3.4.6 - there is an untested patch sitting in git that would
update it.
Zookeeper 3.4.6 allegedly fixes a critical bug to do with joining an
ensemble, but also has all these othe
On 02/07/14 10:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/07/14 10:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I would like to keep openjdk-6 in unstable (with a RC issue so that it
>> doesn't
>> migrate) to prepare and test security updates.
>
> You may want to close #720911 the
On 01/07/14 10:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I would like to keep openjdk-6 in unstable (with a RC issue so that it doesn't
> migrate) to prepare and test security updates.
You may want to close #720911 then.
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Control: block -1 by 750640 720911
Control: block 720911 by 750640
On 30/06/14 00:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On 29/06/14 18:58, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 24/06/14 16:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Is there anyth
Hi Steven,
On 29/06/14 18:58, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/06/14 16:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Is there anything left to do here?
>
> I presume openjdk-6 removal is the last thing to be done here.
> ftpmaster can't do that until icedtea-w
Hi,
On 15/05/13 11:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> jessie won't ship anymore with OpenJDK 6, so we have to build and run using
> OpenJDK 7. The good thing is that almost everythin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-java@lists.debian.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: bzr-eclipse
Version : 0.0.17
Upstream Author : Guillermo González <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://bazaar-vcs.org/BzrEclipse
* License
17 matches
Mail list logo
