-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 February 2004 15:02, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Alan Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > upgrated my deb testing box today and now ArgoUML gives the following
> > error when I try to run it.
>
> Yes, I know, I'm sorry for that. I'll try to
even package up SWT!).
>
> Anyone fancy a stab at making them, or shall I do it? I have no
> experience whatsoever at making deb packages, but how hard can it be? ;-)
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:11:29PM +0100, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
> > Anyway, saw that the screenshots were cre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm working on three java chemistry programs (cdk, jcpcdk and jmol, see
mentors.debian.net APT archive), and I have cdk compiled with gcj 3.3.2 (from
testing).
When I run the cdk-view shell wrapper which does:
/usr/bin/java -cp list-of-ja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
on mentors.debian.net I have two debian packages with java software. Both
are in the contrib section. One is cdk (The Chemistry Development Kit,
cdk.sf.net) which has a library part and executables and the other is jmol
(Jmol, jmol.sf.net),
On Saturday 01 November 2003 20:08, Etienne Gagnon wrote:
> E.L. Willighagen (Egon) wrote:
> > The big question seems to come done to:
> >
> > "What part of Java is library and what part is language?"
> >
> > It seems to me that at least the syntax *and*
On Saturday 01 November 2003 18:41, Etienne Gagnon wrote:
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > GPL says:
> > Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not
> > covered by this License; they are outside its scope. ...
>
> > As running is clearly not covered under GPL, your argument doesn
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 15:03, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> [Please CC: me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the list]
>
> Hi guys,
> I don't know much about java; sorry if I'm saying strange things. :)
>
> As in [1] and in [2] xnap fails to build and run.
>
> For what concerns the build step, I foun
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
> > thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
> > be really nice to also have real Debian packages of all his stuff. (I
> > asked him if he
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
> > thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
> > be really nice to also have real Debian packages of all his stuff. (I
> > asked him if he
On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:23, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:23:30 +0200
> >
> > So it does not depend on any packages outside of main. It is in contrib
> > because
On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:23, Takashi Okamoto wrote:
> From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:23:30 +0200
> >
> > So it does not depend on any packages outside of main. It is in contrib
> > because
On Friday 18 July 2003 11:03, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Jan Schulz wrote:
> I've also come to the conclusion that adding the version number to JARs
> in /usr/share/java/ is a bad idea. Take for example libxercres2-java: If
> you've used /usr/share/java/xercesImpl-2.3.0.jar in another package and
> the
On Friday 18 July 2003 11:03, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Jan Schulz wrote:
> I've also come to the conclusion that adding the version number to JARs
> in /usr/share/java/ is a bad idea. Take for example libxercres2-java: If
> you've used /usr/share/java/xercesImpl-2.3.0.jar in another package and
> the
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:50, D.Hansmann wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the tips, everybody! :)
>
> I'll work on the package and fix it soon! Integrating the ant build
> process seems interesting too, even if i don't know why somebody should
> build a java package from source (without changing it befor
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:50, D.Hansmann wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the tips, everybody! :)
>
> I'll work on the package and fix it soon! Integrating the ant build
> process seems interesting too, even if i don't know why somebody should
> build a java package from source (without changing it befor
On Sunday 13 July 2003 12:11, D.Hansmann wrote:
> I am maintainer of the JFtp-project, a graphical java network browser
> which started as a ftp client but now supports FTP, SFTP, SMB, NFS, HTTP
> and local IO (located at http://j-ftp.sourceforge.net).
>
> However, i created a (really simple) debia
On Sunday 13 July 2003 12:11, D.Hansmann wrote:
> I am maintainer of the JFtp-project, a graphical java network browser
> which started as a ftp client but now supports FTP, SFTP, SMB, NFS, HTTP
> and local IO (located at http://j-ftp.sourceforge.net).
>
> However, i created a (really simple) debia
On Monday 12 May 2003 20:28, Michael S Daines wrote:
> I grabbed a Debian Java FAQ from a link here recently and was trying to
> work through it this weekend. I stumbled, however when I was asked to
> apt-get install java2-common
Where does it say that? I've just checked the source in CVS,
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 01:20, Michael S Daines wrote:
> > As far as I know, the FAQ is for unstable/sid, so if you're using woody
> > or testing, I'm not sure what to do.
That's not true. The FAQ is in principle aimed at both stable and
testing(/unstable). If there are things in the FAQ that do
On Monday 12 May 2003 19:56, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 07:32:09PM +0200, E.L. Willighagen (Egon) wrote:
> > On Monday 12 May 2003 17:29, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > What about SWT? I've used it under both gij and from gcj-compiled code
>
On Monday 12 May 2003 17:29, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 07:43:47AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > --- Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > At issue is not convenience, but speed. Swing is horribly slow, so any
> > > effort to speed it up see
On Saturday 10 May 2003 18:09, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> I do not think no one answer my mail... Do I have to fill a bug for
> this?
If the problem was not resolved on this list, then you should file a bug.
Did not look at the classpath-doc package, but AFAIL all documentation
should indeed go into
On Thursday 08 May 2003 06:32, Jiele wrote:
> > I got some dependency problem while installing tomcat4. Actually, I
> > encountered this before, and thought it would be fixed, but not. tomcat4
> > requires libtomcat4-java (although it shows Suggests), which in turn asks
> > for "j2re1.4 | java
On Tuesday 22 April 2003 23:46, Jan Schulz wrote:
> BTW, can anybody give a nice URL/short explanations, how to make
> diffs against the files in debian subdir? I would like to submit a
> bugreport with patches for this (and some other things I found) and
> a short look at "man diff" scared me off
Hi all,
which much interest I have been reading the swing thread the last few days...
I was wondering though... Is Swing the only GUI available? That is, are there
alternatives? There is AWT ofcourse, but I nevered used that, because Swing
looked so much better...
What about the KDE bindings?
On Thursday 10 April 2003 11:29, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> >Yes, that would be ideal. But besides the actual command, it would be very
> >nice to have a list of free compilers/VM that I might try my software
> > with. It would be nice to see how I can easily/conveniently determine
> > what problems t
On Thursday 10 April 2003 07:51, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> There are more than one ways to do this. My suggestion is to have two
> packages:
>
> cdk-java (command line)
> cdk-gui-java (swing stuff)
>
> the command line package needs to be compilable with a free javac (gij,
> jikes etc). As for the b
Hi all,
i've attached a disturbing news item on the likely event that kaffee will be
removed from unstable... The bugs are marked pending (meaning that a patch is
available?) which might suggest that it nothing to worry about. Is that true?
kind regards,
Egon
-- Forwarded Message -
Hi all,
i've attached a disturbing news item on the likely event that kaffee will be
removed from unstable... The bugs are marked pending (meaning that a patch is
available?) which might suggest that it nothing to worry about. Is that true?
kind regards,
Egon
-- Forwarded Message -
Hi all,
working on internationalizing some OS Java tools, I was wondering how to
access bash export variables, one specific being LANG...
The method System.getProperty() seems only to handle things like
"-Dlang=en_EN" as a command line option, and yes, the wrapper could as such
transfer the $LA
Hi all,
working on internationalizing some OS Java tools, I was wondering how to
access bash export variables, one specific being LANG...
The method System.getProperty() seems only to handle things like
"-Dlang=en_EN" as a command line option, and yes, the wrapper could as such
transfer the $L
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 13:45, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > [Ant, Xalan2]
> > Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
>
> I've done some tests with Ant and at least the core classes (i.e.
> the ones in ant.jar) worked fine. Most of the o
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 13:45, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > [Ant, Xalan2]
> > Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
>
> I've done some tests with Ant and at least the core classes (i.e.
> the ones in ant.jar) worked fine. Most of the
Hi all,
can anyone tell me the difference (performance etc) between:
1. String someString = "text"
if ("some text".equals(someString)) {};
and
2. String someString = "text"
if (someString.equals("some text")) {};
regards,
Egon
Hi all,
can anyone tell me the difference (performance etc) between:
1. String someString = "text"
if ("some text".equals(someString)) {};
and
2. String someString = "text"
if (someString.equals("some text")) {};
regards,
Egon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
I know the Ant part of Tomcat was packaged... i downloaded it some months
ago from the upload server... I guess it is in unstable now at least...
Egon
I know the Ant part of Tomcat was packaged... i downloaded it some months
ago from the upload server... I guess it is in unstable now at least...
Egon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All jars files in /usr/share/java have no versioning. Is that policy?
In Java versioning is also important... i have often many troubles finding
the correct xerces.jar version for example...
XMLDiffMerger (or something, IBM Alphaworks) for example, only works with an
old xerces version, but it
Ant (http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/index.html) is the 'Java version' of
make and uses XML for the 'Makefile'...
It is cool technology... Has anyone packaged it? If not so, i will try
second/third week of august (i am not a Deb. developer yet, but hope to become
one in time...)
Egon
All jars files in /usr/share/java have no versioning. Is that policy?
In Java versioning is also important... i have often many troubles finding
the correct xerces.jar version for example...
XMLDiffMerger (or something, IBM Alphaworks) for example, only works with an
old xerces version, but it
Ant (http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/index.html) is the 'Java version' of
make and uses XML for the 'Makefile'...
It is cool technology... Has anyone packaged it? If not so, i will try
second/third week of august (i am not a Deb. developer yet, but hope to become
one in time...)
Egon
--
To UN
41 matches
Mail list logo
