On Tuesday 15 March 2005 14:10, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Hmmm, the idea has its merits. Implementationwise, it'd make more sense
> > to have $lib-jbi Build-Depend on $lib-java. The $lib-jbi would have to be
> > a sperate source, but I imagine that cuold be a very small standard
> > template, which f
On Sunday 13 March 2005 22:05, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> But just for discussion - wouldn't there be a third possibility ?
> (Sorry if this is a stupid question !).
>
> What about a creating a second source package which build-depends
> on the java source package to produce the native binary. This wou
On Sunday 30 January 2005 06:53, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> 3. Provide a new 'update-gcj-database' or some such to generate
> a /usr/lib/java/gcj.db file in the postinst of all of these packages.
That should probably be /var/lib/java/gcj.db?
Regards, David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
3 matches
Mail list logo
