Re: clojure-maven-helper, maven-javadoc-plugin and #711852

Le samedi 17 août 2013 17:02:42 Wolodja Wentland a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am running into a problem during the apidoc generation phase when using > maven-debian-helper [0] ever since the maven target to generate the > documentation was changed from "javadoc:jar" to "javadoc:javadoc". This was > d

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Java Meeting at debconf

Le mercredi 14 août 2013 07:04:15 Thomas Koch a écrit : > Ioan Eugen Stan scheduled a Java Meeting at debconf > Unfortunately he could not make it to debconf. I think we should still meet > and discuss current state and matters of Java in Debian. > > Is there anybody who would volunteer to collect

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Java Meeting at debconf

Le mercredi 14 août 2013 07:15:51 Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : > > Is there anybody who would volunteer to collect topics and moderate the > > session? Could anybody please reply with topic proposols to this mail (on > > debian-java list only)? > > Sure. Good idea. > Damien, are you also interested t

Re: java.library.path should include /usr/local/lib

Hi Thomas, 2013/5/27 Thomas Koch > apparently, the search path for native libraries in OpenJDK on Debian > (system property java.library.path) does not include /usr/local/lib. I > think it should. > > Starting my java app with LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib "solved" the > problem. > Should I fil

Re: default-jdk versionned depends ? Was: Java Activation Framework removal

2013/5/17 Emmanuel Bourg > For JAF specifically I think we are safe, I checked that GCJ provided an > implementation [1]. I haven't compared the implementation class by class > but it seems quite complete. I verified that libgnumail-java could build > on kfreebsd without libgnujaf-java. > > On th

Re: default-jdk versionned depends ? Was: Java Activation Framework removal

Hi Niels, 2013/5/17 Niels Thykier > On 2013-05-17 22:31, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > >> Emmanuel Bourg > >> There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in > >> Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the &

default-jdk versionned depends ? Was: Java Activation Framework removal

Hi Emmanuel, 2013/5/16 Emmanuel Bourg > Hi all, > > There are three packages implementing the Java Activation Framework in > Debian. They could be removed now that Java 6 and upward integrate the > most recent version of JAF. > Even if default-jdk package will soon become alias for openjdk-7 [1

Re: Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD

Hi Guido, 2013/5/8 Guido Günther > I updated the patches and also updated OpenJDK to 2.3.9 which has > another bootstrap problem fixed. Thus I get a bit further: > OK, that's great ! > /usr/bin/xsltproc -IN > /data/home/agx/openjdk7/openjdk-7/build/openjdk-boot/hotspot/src/share/vm/prims/jvmt

Re: Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD

Hi Guido, 2013/5/6 Guido Günther > > > Are there any other options besides gcj on kFreeBSD? > > > > Maybe you can try to install old snapshot of openjdk-7 package which > works > > under kFreeBSD ? > > http://people.debian.org/~drazzib/openjdk/kfreebsd-snapshots/ > > > > [NB: current release of

Re: Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD

Le vendredi 03 mai 2013 09:48:52 Guido Günther a écrit : > Hi, Hi, > did anybody here succeed on running a Jenkins Build Slave on kFreeBSD? > Using the SSH Slave Plugin on the master (running Wheezy's OpenJDK) and > gcj-4.7 on the Sid kFreeBSD I get: [...] > > So it manages to connect but fails

Re: RFS: commons-math3/3.2-1 (new upstream release for experimental)

On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:29:32 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, Hi Emmanuel! > Here is the changelog: > > * New upstream release (Closes: #689645) > * Refreshed the patches > * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes) > * debian/rules: the clean target now properly removes the d

Re: RFS: update to plexus-containers1.5

On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:37:43 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, Hi Thomas, > while updating maven-plugin-tools to version 3.2 I found that it > introduced a new dependency to plexus-containers, which in turn depended on > maven-plugin-tools to generate the plugin.xml. > > I've copied the generated

Re: Your experience with liferay?

Hi Thomas, Le samedi 02 février 2013 12:57:54, Thomas Koch a écrit : > What was your experience with liferay in 2010? I wouldn't like to develop > on top of something that would never be likely to enter Debian. What is > your experience with upstream? Do they have an interest to make changes to >

Re: RFS: jenkins-trilead-ssh2 214-jenkins-1-1~exp1 (updated)

Le mercredi 09 janvier 2013 23:37:19, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team Hi James ! > I am looking for a sponsor for an update to the package > "jenkins-trilead-ssh2". > > * Package name: jenkins-trilead-ssh2 > Version : 214-jenkins-1-1~exp1 > > This is a new upstream release to supp

Re: RFS: libjbcrypt-java 0.3-4~exp1 (updated)

Le mercredi 09 janvier 2013 23:28:28, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team > > I am looking for a sponsor for an update to the package "libjbcrypt-java". > > * Package name: libjbcrypt-java > Version : 0.3-4~exp1 > > This update deploys maven artifacts for jbcrypt; I need this to support

Re: Is mh_checkrepo in maven-repo-helper needed?

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:29:10 +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: > Hi, Hi Thomas, > maven-repo-helper contains the executable mh_checkrepo. It does not seem > to be useful to me. Can I remove it and the corresponding java code? That would > save a lot of work. > It would even be easier to remove the tool

WiP on gradle 1.1

[I'm CCing debian-java@l.d.o as other team's member might be interrested in] Hi, I've spend some hours trying to update Gradle package to 1.1 release and I think I've now a pretty much working package (at least I can rebuild gradle with itself ;). I've pushed my changes to Alioth in a personna

Re: Visualvm (GPL monitoring and performance analysis tool for the jvm) in debian

Hi Cédric, Le 17/08/2012 16:42, Cédric Pineau a écrit : I got a request (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676877) to add the jvisualvm provided via java-package generated packages in the PATH. I'd prefer to make the visualvm available on its own in debian (jvisualvm being a

Re: Cleanup in pkg-java subversion tree

27;t see real gain of migrate of all those to Git (but maybe I'm wrong). I use Git for all new packages but I won't take time to migrate existing packages to Git. Cheers, -- Damien Raude-Morvan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Re: At least recommend /u/s/maven-repo

. Please submit a patch to include something like this. Cheers, -- Damien Raude-Morvan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/501d7c0a.8090...@drazzib.com

Re: Java Policy: /usr/share/java vs. /u/s/maven-repo

Le 04/08/2012 10:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : Le 04/08/2012 09:59, Thomas Koch a écrit : Hi, do you think we should change the java policy and relax the requirement to install java libraries to /usr/share/java in favour of /usr/share/maven-repo? At least I'd like to see a very strong recommen

Re: Help: symlink problems building openjdk-6

Le 03/08/2012 14:36, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : Hi, Hi Thorsten, after doko recommended it to me *way* back then, but only now I’ve got all of its Build-Depends installable, I’m currently trying to build src:openjdk-6 (with all references to gcj-4.7 changed back to gcj-4.6, and, for consistenc

Re: Bug#675495: Should not be released with Wheezy

Hi, On 01/06/2012 18:53, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le 01/06/2012 16:35, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit : >> Package: openjdk-6 >> Severity: serious >> >> Upstream support for Java 6 ends in November: >> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html >> >> As such, we should not include i

Re: RFS: libcommons-codec-java 1.6-1 (updated)

Hi James, Le mercredi 23 mai 2012 13:03:19, James Page a écrit : > I am looking for a sponsor for an update to the package > "libcommons-codec-java". > > * Package name: libcommons-codec-java > Version : 1.6-1 [...] > It would be great if someone could reviewi, upload and tag this p

[Uploaded] RFS: jsoup 1.6.2-1 (fixes RC bug)

Le samedi 12 mai 2012 18:32:14, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Hi, > > this is just a friendly reminder that jsoup package is still looking > for a sponsor. Thanks for the reminder :) Just uploaded. Cheers, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan signature.asc Descripti

Re: Move libspring packaging to Git?

Le jeudi 10 mai 2012 18:44:04, Thomas Koch a écrit : > Hi, Hi Thomas! > I maybe need spring-security 3.0 to package jamwiki (do you know it?). But > it is not packaged. What's the reason? Other spring 3.x stuff is packaged. > I might help out with spring packaging. But could we move the packaging

Re: hamcrest 1.2

On 12/03/2012 22:04, Brian Thomason wrote: Hello all, Hi Brian, I uploaded hamcrest 1.2 some time ago in efforts to get the dependency chain of Eucalyptus 3.1 in place which we plan to upload to Debian soon. I was unaware that junit4 still fails to build against anything greater than 1.1 -

Re: RFS: netbeans

Le dimanche 19 février 2012 23:19:07, Andrew Ross a écrit : > Hi Damien, Hi Andrew, > I've just pushed some more updates to the Netbeans package to the git > repository (git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/netbeans.git). These > achieve the following: > > * Include junit library definitions.

Re: Any chance of getting ASM 4 into Debian?

Hi David, On 11/02/2012 20:33, David Goodenough wrote: I notice that we have ASM, ASM2 and ASM3 in Debian, and that ASM4 was released (or at least the latest version of ASM4) in October 2011. Any chance of getting it packaged up? As already said by Miguel, I've opened a RFP (Request For Packa

Re: Please upload fop (svn)

Hi Mathieu, Le dimanche 15 janvier 2012 11:14:41, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan > Thanks everyone for the confirmation. I feel confident the package is > in good shape now. > Could anyone (DD) please upload the latest from fop (

Re: Please upload fop (svn)

Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 08:30:08, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > > Since you moved files from fop to libfop-java, I think you should add : > > Replaces: fop (<< 1:1.0.dfsg2-6) > > Breaks: fop (<< 1:1.0.dfsg2-6) > > to libfop-java ? > > I did apply you change on the svn however I still worried t

Working on jackrabbit (without non-free JCR API)

retitle 589450 ITP: jackrabbit -- Content Repository for Java owner 589450 ! thanks Hi Team ! I've started packaging a _subset_ of jackrabbit. I'll work on providing only a small "libjackrabbit-java" package and, as a first step, I'll only build jackrabbit-webdav module, so we can package wagon

Re: Please upload fop (svn)

Le jeudi 05 janvier 2012 14:52:37, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > Hi DDs, Salut Mathieu :) > Happy New Year ! Thanks ! Happy debian hacking for this new year :) > I'd appreciate if someone could upload the latest (and greatest) of > fop debian package. My last commit split the package into t

Re: RFS: jaxme [Uploaded]

Le samedi 07 janvier 2012 03:20:08, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "jaxme". > > * Package name: jaxme > Version : 0.5.2+dfsg-6 > Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation > * URL : http://ws.apache.org/

Re: java6-runtime on Ubuntu?

Le lundi 09 janvier 2012 18:09:27, Olivier Sallou a écrit : > Hi, > I have a short question regarding jdk7 > I have a package that depends on default-jdk. > > An Ubuntu user asks me to depend (also) on jdk7. > Though this can easilly be done by adding a new OR condition to the > dependencies (defa

Re: Revised RFS: jenkins 1.409.3-1 (new)

Le jeudi 05 janvier 2012 14:57:15, James Page a écrit : > I've updated as we discussed; the 'dummy.keystore' keystore is used to > self sign the slave.jar when its downloaded using Java WebStart; however > it only contained a self-signed cert so I've removed it from the > orig.tar.gz and updated de

Re: Maven 3.x in experimental

Ioan, On 04/01/2012 09:01, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote: 2011/12/30 Damien Raude-Morvan: Hi Java team! Maven 3.x is now available in experimental in a new _maven_ debian package. You'll also need updated _maven2_ package (>= 2.2.1-11) to allow side-by-side installation (I'm using al

Re: Revised RFS: jenkins 1.409.3-1 (new)

On 03/01/2012 11:00, James Page wrote: Hi Damien Hi James! war/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/update-center-rootCAs/hudson-community This certificate (well its parent in fact) is used by Jenkins centrally to sign updates/plugins etc that are published to the jenkins update centers; I think this sho

Maven 3.x in experimental

Hi Java team! Maven 3.x is now available in experimental in a new _maven_ debian package. You'll also need updated _maven2_ package (>= 2.2.1-11) to allow side-by-side installation (I'm using alternatives to allow user to choose between "mvn" cli tool). Please test and report any issue. I'm es

Re: maven 3 packaging

Le mercredi 21 décembre 2011 11:28:07, Ioan Eugen Stan a écrit : > Hello everybody, Hi Ioan! > I wish to see maven 3 in the next Debian release so I decided to give a > hand in packaging it. I have some experience in using maven but I'm not > very familiar with it's internals. Kind of the same go

Re: Revised RFS: jenkins 1.409.3-1 (new)

Le vendredi 16 décembre 2011 13:26:43, James Page a écrit : > Hi Damien Hi James, > On 16/12/11 12:25, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > I've started reviewing this package but it's a large beast... so it > > will take some time to check everything. > > Marvellous

Re: Revised RFS: jenkins 1.409.3-1 (new)

Hi James, On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:59:04 +, James Page wrote: > On 10/12/11 23:03, James Page wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "jenkins". [...] >> This revised package now includes init scripts and /etc/default >> configuration for Debian installations. [...] >> It would

Re: RFS: jenkins 1.409.3-1 (new)

Le mercredi 07 décembre 2011 10:28:31, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team Hi James! > The upload would fix this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/561963 Don't you need libmaven-hpi-plugin-java upload first ? It seems to be used into debian/maven.rules but there is no Build-Depends on this one. Cheers, -

Re: RFS: jenkins-htmlunit 2.6-jenkins-6-1 (new)

Le lundi 28 novembre 2011 12:53:44, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "jenkins-htmlunit". > > * Package name: jenkins-htmlunit > Version : 2.6-jenkins-6-1 > * URL : http://github.com/jenkinsci/htmlunit > * License :

Re: RFS: jenkins-htmlunit-core-js 2.6-hudson-1-1 (new)

Le lundi 28 novembre 2011 11:40:38, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "jenkins-htmlunit-core-js". > > * Package name: jenkins-htmlunit-core-js > Version : 2.6-hudson-1-1 > * URL : http://github.com/jenkinsci/core-js > * Lice

Re: RFS: libjdom1-java

Hi Jakub! Le dimanche 20 novembre 2011 14:57:23, Jakub Adam a écrit : > I am looking for a sponsor for package "libjdom1-java". [...] > I updated OSGi metadata after new upstream release upload in 1.1.2+dfsg-1. Uploaded! Thanks for your work. Cheers, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.d

Re: RFS: libxmlrpc3-java

Hi Jakub, Le mercredi 16 novembre 2011 23:28:51, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "libxmlrpc3-java" [...] > I added required metadata. Uploaded with some additional change (fix for #581487). Thanks, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki

Re: RFS: libjaxp1.3-java

Hi Jakub, Le mercredi 16 novembre 2011 00:43:39, Jakub Adam a écrit : > I am looking for a sponsor for package "libjaxp1.3-java". [...] > I added required metadata and fixed a couple of lintian warnings. Uploaded too. Thanks, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorva

Re: RFS: wsdl4j

Hi Jakub, Le mardi 15 novembre 2011 21:36:38, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "wsdl4j". [...] > I added required metadata and upgraded standards-version to 3.9.2. Uploaded. Regards, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/Dami

Re: sunjava-db already packaged in Debian and same as Derby

Le jeudi 17 novembre 2011 23:56:56, Ludovic Claude a écrit : > Hello, Hi, > The package sunjava-db is already present in Debian, it's a version of > Derby which is supported by Sun. non-free != Debian :) > Unless your project requires a specific version of Derby, you should > probably be able

Re: Maven 3 : status update

Le mardi 15 novembre 2011 23:46:21, Ludovic Claude a écrit : > Hello Damien, Hi Ludovic! > There is some progress on my side. > Could you sponsor the following packages: > > maven-ant-helper, maven-repo-helper, apache-pom, commons-parent, > commons-lang Great! I'll have a look during this week.

Re: RFS: libcommons-discovery-java

Le mardi 15 novembre 2011 00:26:38, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Dear java packagers, Hi Jakub, > I am looking for a sponsor for package "libcommons-discovery-java". [...] > Package is already in Debian, but installed jar archive is missing OSGi > metadata in its manifest that I need there to be able t

Re: Switching default-java to OpenJDK7

Hi James, Le vendredi 11 novembre 2011 12:30:43, James Page a écrit : > I have conducted a Ubuntu precise rebuild test with default-jdk switched > to use openjdk-7 and at the moment there are around ~100 packages > which fail to build from source (see [1]). Launchpad seems to timeout... Have you

Maven 3 : status update

Hi Team! I've just updated Maven3 wiki page [1] with my latest ITPs. I've also tried to cleanup each dependencies level. From a quick overview, it seems that we'll need to keep some duplicate packages to have both Maven 2.x and Maven 3.x dependencies at the same time in archive... Right now, I

Bug#648774: ITP: plexus-utils2 -- utilities for the Plexus framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: plexus-utils2 Version : 2.0.5 Upstream Author : Codehaus * URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-utils * License :

Bug#648773: ITP: plexus-classworlds2 -- Class loading utilities for the Plexus framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: plexus-classworlds2 Version : 2.2.3 Upstream Author : Codehaus * URL : http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-classworlds * License :

Re: Bug#648656: ITP: sisu-guice -- Patched build of Google Guice for Sisu-IoC

Le dimanche 13 novembre 2011 21:19:35, Thomas Koch a écrit : > Damien Raude-Morvan: > > * Package name: sisu-guice > > > > This package contains a patched build of Guice modified for > > Sisu IoC framework (for instance, removes the need to write > > e

Bug#648657: ITP: sisu-ioc -- JSR 330 container and OSGi/Plexus adapter

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: sisu-ioc Version : 2.3.0 Upstream Author : Sonatype * URL : https://github.com/sonatype/sisu * License : Apache and Eclipse Publ

Bug#648656: ITP: sisu-guice -- Patched build of Google Guice for Sisu-IoC

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: sisu-guice Version : 3.1.0 Upstream Author : Sonatype and Google Inc. * URL : https://github.com/sonatype/sisu-guice * License :

Bug#648644: ITP: cdi-api -- Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java EE

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: cdi-api Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Red Hat Middleware LLC * URL : http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=299 * License :

Re: RFS: lucene3

Le lundi 12 septembre 2011 16:40:32, James Page a écrit : > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 23:49 +0100, Mat Scales wrote: > > Hello all, Hi Mat, > I'm unable to sponsor your package but I do have the following feedback: > > 1) FTBFS on javadoc warnings [...] > 2) debhelper + javahelper [...] > 3) Repack

Re: snappy-java mh-buildable with libmaven-bundle-plugin-java 2.3.4 but not 2.3.5.

Hi again Charles, On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:19:53 +0900, Charles Plessy > I've already saw this exception "java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > aQute.lib.osgi.Processor.printClauses" when updating maven-bundle-plugin > from 2.3.4 to 2.3.5. > That's why maven-bundle-plugin Depends on "bnd (>= 1.44.0)" but m

Re: snappy-java mh-buildable with libmaven-bundle-plugin-java 2.3.4 but not 2.3.5.

On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:19:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Dear all, Hi Charles, > noticing that libmaven-bundle-plugin-java is still at version 2.3.4 in > Wheezy, > I downgraded and the package built fine. However, it refuses to build with > 2.3.5. If I edit the pom.xml file to replace 2.3.4

Re: RFS: jenkins-winstone 0.9.10-jenkins-28+dfsg-1 (new)

Le mardi 01 novembre 2011 22:14:45, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team Hi James, > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "jenkins-winstone". > > * Package name: jenkins-winstone > Version : 0.9.10-jenkins-28+dfsg-1 > * URL : http://github.com/jenkinsci/winstone > *

Re: RFS: axis

Le jeudi 27 octobre 2011 22:08:36, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Dear java packagers, Hi, > Package is already in Debian, but installed jar archive is missing OSGi > metadata in its manifest that I need there to be able to use this java > library as a dependency of Eclipse plugin eclipse-mylyn, that I a

Re: RFS: eclipse-egit

Le mercredi 26 octobre 2011 22:12:18, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Hi Damien, > > > There is no pristine-tar branch in your git repository. Could you please > > add pristine-tar delta ? It would be easier for reviewer to directly > > review& upload your package. > > I pushed pristine-tar delta to git r

Re: RFS: eclipse-egit

Le mardi 25 octobre 2011 22:30:24, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Dear java packagers, Hi Jakub, > I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-egit". > > * Package name: eclipse-egit > Version : 1.1.0-1 > Upstream Author : Eclipse EGit project > * URL : http://www

Re: RFS: stapler-adjunct-timeline 1.3-1 (new)

Le mercredi 26 octobre 2011 17:53:20, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "stapler-adjunct-timeline". > > * Package name: stapler-adjunct-timeline > Version : 1.3-1 > * URL : http://stapler.java.net > * License : BSD >

Re: RFS: maven-stapler-plugin 1.16-1 (new)

Le mercredi 26 octobre 2011 18:40:27, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team Hi James, > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "maven-stapler-plugin". > > * Package name: maven-stapler-plugin > Version : 1.16-1 > * URL : http://stapler.java.net/ > * License : BS

Re: RFS: svnclientadapter

Le mercredi 26 octobre 2011 19:46:25, Jakub Adam a écrit : > Dear java packagers, Hi! > I am looking for a sponsor for package "svnclientadapter". [...] > Package is already in Debian, but installed jar archive is missing OSGi > metadata in its manifest that I need there to be able to use this ja

Re: RFS: netbeans

Le dimanche 23 octobre 2011 17:52:02, Andrew Ross a écrit : > Hi Damien, Hi Andrew, > I've just pushed some updates to the Netbeans package to the git > repository (git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/netbeans.git). These > achieve the following: > > Use the new package libosgi-core-java to pr

Re: OpenJDK-7 on kFreeBSD: Status update.

Le vendredi 07 octobre 2011 22:09:48, Christoph Egger a écrit : > Hi! > > Damien Raude-Morvan writes: > > To get a clear overview of what's going on : > > 1) openjdk-7 source package build fine under both > > > > - a clean sid KVM : http://deb.li/WQyI &

OpenJDK-7 on kFreeBSD: Status update.

Hi GNU/kFreeBSD hackers, Here is some openjdk-7 for GNU/kFreeBSD update! Let start by good news. Since early september I have near-fully-working kfreebsd-i386 openjdk-7 snapshots uploaded on my people.debian.org [1]. And since #637474 (GCJ segfault under kfreebsd-amd64) has been fixed, there is n

Bug#643981: ITP: felix-osgi-core -- Java OSGi interfaces - Core module

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: felix-osgi-core Version : 1.4.0 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation / OSGi Alliance * URL : http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-

Bug#643980: ITP: felix-osgi-foundation -- Java OSGi interfaces - Foundation Execution

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: felix-osgi-foundation Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation / OSGi Alliance * URL : http://felix.apache.org/s

Bug#643979: ITP: felix-osgi-compendium -- Java OSGi interfaces - Compendium module

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: felix-osgi-compendium Version : 1.4.0 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation / OSGi Alliance * URL : http://felix.apache.org/s

Re: RFS: jenkins-commons-jelly 1.1-jenkins-20110627-1 (new)

Le mercredi 28 septembre 2011 15:08:40, James Page a écrit : > On 28/09/11 13:59, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Could you please push tags also into alioth git repository ? > > (upstream/1.1- jenkins-20110627 seems to be missing) > > Done Good, uploaded. Cheers, -- Damie

Re: RFS: jenkins-commons-jelly 1.1-jenkins-20110627-1 (new)

Le lundi 19 septembre 2011 11:14:12, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team Hi James, > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "jenkins-commons-jelly". [...] > My motivation for maintaining this package is that it is a dependency of > Jenkins. [...] > It would be great if someone could review and

Re: RFS: jenkins-xstream 1.3.1-jenkins-9-1 (new)

Le lundi 19 septembre 2011 11:48:50, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "jenkins-xstream". [...] > My motivation for maintaining this package is that it is a dependency of > Jenkins. Uploaded. Thanks -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.

Re: RFS: trilead-putty-extension 1.1-1 (new)

Le lundi 19 septembre 2011 16:00:41, James Page a écrit : > Hi Team > > I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "trilead-putty-extension". [...] > My motivation for maintaining this package is that it is a dependency of > Jenkins. Uploaded. Thanks -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki

Re: openjdk-6 and openjdk-7 multiarch installable

Hi, Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011 03:06:47, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 09/01/2011 10:46 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to > >> the end? > > > > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/j

Bug#642333: ITP: libcommons-lang3-java -- Extension of the java.lang package (for Java 5)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" X-Debbugs-CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libcommons-lang3-java Version : 3.0.1 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://commons.apache.org/lang/

Re: RFS: guice (new package, needed by openid4java)

Le dimanche 11 septembre 2011 18:20:49, Miguel Landaeta a écrit : > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan > > wrote: > > Just two small things to fix : > > - there is no pristine-tar branch in git. So it's complicated to check > > your orig.tar

Re: RFS: guice (new package, needed by openid4java)

Le jeudi 08 septembre 2011 20:25:38, Miguel Landaeta a écrit : > Hi team, Hi Miguel! > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "guice". > > * Package name: guice [...] > My motivation for maintaining this package is: > I need this library in order to build and package openid4java. Just tw

Re: Netbeans Package

Le samedi 10 septembre 2011 13:34:31, Andrew Ross a écrit : > I've just uploaded the changes I wanted to make once libswingx1-java was > accepted. I definitely think once you've reviewed the package and are > happy with it then it would be good to upload it. As you say, we can > always work on more

Re: Netbeans Package

Hi Andrew, Le mercredi 07 septembre 2011 20:29:38, Andrew Ross a écrit : > Now I've got most of the core of Netbeans building OK I've been having a > look at what it would take to enable the remaining modules. > > I've been trying to capture things on the Debian wiki at: > http://wiki.debian.org/

Re: Status of jai-imageio-core

Le vendredi 09 septembre 2011 19:56:00, Mat Scales a écrit : > IANAL, but it reads to me like a warranty disclaimer rather than a > restriction. It says "it isn't designed to do these things so if you use it > for these things and your nuclear power plant blows up then it's not my > fault" rather t

Re: Status of jai-imageio-core

On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:09:33 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Dear all, > > I need to work on a jai-imageio-core package for Java. Did anyone > started anything about this package ? This will have to go in non-free > at best. Looking at LICENCE file [1], this clause seems non-free regarding DF

Re: Oracle's Java package status

Le dimanche 04 septembre 2011 13:54:17, Niels Thykier a écrit : > As I recall, java-common used to have some templates for creating a > deb-package to trick APT into thinking that Java was installed. I > suppose those could be restored - feel free to file a wishlist bug > against java-common for t

Re: java-access-bridge official packaging source ?

Le mercredi 31 août 2011 00:36:29, Matthias Klose a écrit : > I'll have to dig out why I can't write to the svn repo. it would be nice, > if somebody could commit these, and the java-common changes to the repo > for now. FTR, I've just merged java-common changes back into svn repository. Cheers,

Re: java-access-bridge official packaging source ?

Le mercredi 31 août 2011 00:36:29, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 08/31/2011 12:12 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Le mercredi 31 août 2011 00:03:26, Torsten Werner a écrit : > >> we should try to merge doko's changes back into our SVN repo. Do you > >> need he

Re: Bug#639954: azureus: FTBFS (multiarch breakage)

Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 02:19:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:03:36AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > Adrian, > > > > Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in > > this > > > > case with de

Re: Bug#639954: azureus: FTBFS (multiarch breakage)

Adrian, Please, don't start MBF without checking first with debian-devel (or in this case with debian-java) : it's not only java-access-bridge and azureus but many more packages. Debian Java Team is fully aware that recent changes in openjdk-6 / openjdk-7 makes roughly 60+ packages FTBFS. Le j

Re: java-access-bridge official packaging source ?

Le mercredi 31 août 2011 00:03:26, Torsten Werner a écrit : > we should try to merge doko's changes back into our SVN repo. Do you need > help? Ok, I finally found doko packaging on launchpad [1]. I'm already working on this package, so I'll work on merging doko changes and notify him of using ou

java-access-bridge official packaging source ?

Hi all, I'm trying to fix java-access-bridge to build with openjdk-7 but I can find the "official" debian packaging source. There is differences between package published in archive by doko [1] and what's inside pkg-java SVN repository [2]. I've compiled a diff here [3]. Can some one points me

Re: Java's SVN not reachable on Alioth [Fwd: Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

Hi all, Le mercredi 06 juillet 2011 16:17:22, tony mancill a écrit : > On 07/02/2011 11:47 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > > On 03/07/11 00:49, gregor herrmann wrote: > >> The alioth admins have removed the ancient pkg-perl CVS repo on my > >> request, I guess that's also the way to go for the java team

Re: Maven 3

Le mardi 30 août 2011 09:59:41, Torsten Werner a écrit : > Hi Ludovic, Damien & others, > > I've looked at . Is that page more > or less up to date? What would be a good task to start with if someone > want to contribute to packaging Maven 3? I think this page

Re: Netbeans Package

Hi Andrew, Le mercredi 24 août 2011 00:36:50, Andrew Ross a écrit : > I've reached the stage where I've got a Netbeans 7.0.1 package building > fine with a (hopefully) complete debian/copyright file. I just pushed > the final changes this evening. I'll do some testing over the next > couple of day

Re: Maven-debian-helper should handle Maven plugin updates automatically

Le mardi 23 août 2011 21:40:36, Torsten Werner a écrit : > Hi! Hi Torsten, > I'd like to get your input on an idea which I have written down at > . I have prepared the detailed > ideas only for the very first step. What do you think about that? For interrested

Re: RFS: libnb-javaparser-java (updated package)

Le lundi 22 août 2011 23:42:14, Andrew Ross a écrit : > Dear Debian Java Team members, Hi Andrew, > I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package > libnb-javaparser-java. This is a dependency of the latest Netbeans which > I am nearly done packaging. > > I've pushed my changes to the l

  1   2   3   4   >